OBJECTIVE: The goal of this study was to compare the semi-quantitative Goutallier classification for fat infiltration with quantitative fat-fraction derived from a magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) chemical shift-based water/fat separation technique. METHODS: Sixty-two women (age 61 ± 6 years), 27 of whom had diabetes, underwent MRI of the calf using a T1-weighted fast spin-echo sequence and a six-echo spoiled gradient-echo sequence at 3 T. Water/fat images and fat fraction maps were reconstructed using the IDEAL algorithm with T2* correction and a multi-peak model for the fat spectrum. Two radiologists scored fat infiltration on the T1-weighted images using the Goutallier classification in six muscle compartments. Spearman correlations between the Goutallier grades and the fat fraction were calculated; in addition, intra-observer and inter-observer agreement were calculated. RESULTS: A significant correlation between the clinical grading and the fat fraction values was found for all muscle compartments (P < 0.0001, R values ranging from 0.79 to 0.88). Goutallier grades 0-4 had a fat fraction ranging from 3.5 to 19%. Intra-observer and inter-observer agreement values of 0.83 and 0.81 were calculated for the semi-quantitative grading. CONCLUSION: Semi-quantitative grading of intramuscular fat and quantitative fat fraction were significantly correlated and both techniques had excellent reproducibility. However, the clinical grading was found to overestimate muscle fat. KEY POINTS: Fat infiltration of muscle commonly occurs in many metabolic and neuromuscular diseases. • Image-based semi-quantitative classifications for assessing fat infiltration are not well validated. • Quantitative MRI techniques provide an accurate assessment of muscle fat.
OBJECTIVE: The goal of this study was to compare the semi-quantitative Goutallier classification for fat infiltration with quantitative fat-fraction derived from a magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) chemical shift-based water/fat separation technique. METHODS: Sixty-two women (age 61 ± 6 years), 27 of whom had diabetes, underwent MRI of the calf using a T1-weighted fast spin-echo sequence and a six-echo spoiled gradient-echo sequence at 3 T. Water/fat images and fat fraction maps were reconstructed using the IDEAL algorithm with T2* correction and a multi-peak model for the fat spectrum. Two radiologists scored fat infiltration on the T1-weighted images using the Goutallier classification in six muscle compartments. Spearman correlations between the Goutallier grades and the fat fraction were calculated; in addition, intra-observer and inter-observer agreement were calculated. RESULTS: A significant correlation between the clinical grading and the fat fraction values was found for all muscle compartments (P < 0.0001, R values ranging from 0.79 to 0.88). Goutallier grades 0-4 had a fat fraction ranging from 3.5 to 19%. Intra-observer and inter-observer agreement values of 0.83 and 0.81 were calculated for the semi-quantitative grading. CONCLUSION: Semi-quantitative grading of intramuscular fat and quantitative fat fraction were significantly correlated and both techniques had excellent reproducibility. However, the clinical grading was found to overestimate muscle fat. KEY POINTS: Fat infiltration of muscle commonly occurs in many metabolic and neuromuscular diseases. • Image-based semi-quantitative classifications for assessing fat infiltration are not well validated. • Quantitative MRI techniques provide an accurate assessment of muscle fat.
Authors: Christian W A Pfirrmann; Marius R Schmid; Marco Zanetti; Bernhard Jost; Christian Gerber; Juerg Hodler Journal: Radiology Date: 2004-09 Impact factor: 11.105
Authors: Dimitrios C Karampinos; Thomas Baum; Lorenzo Nardo; Hamza Alizai; Huanzhou Yu; Julio Carballido-Gamio; S Paran Yap; Ann Shimakawa; Thomas M Link; Sharmila Majumdar Journal: J Magn Reson Imaging Date: 2011-11-29 Impact factor: 4.813
Authors: Jürgen Machann; Oliver P Bachmann; Klaus Brechtel; Dominik B Dahl; Beate Wietek; Bernhard Klumpp; Hans-U Häring; Claus D Claussen; Stephan Jacob; Fritz Schick Journal: J Magn Reson Imaging Date: 2003-03 Impact factor: 4.813
Authors: Sarah Karampatos; Alexandra Papaioannou; Karen A Beattie; Monica R Maly; Adrian Chan; Jonathan D Adachi; Janet M Pritchard Journal: MAGMA Date: 2015-12-24 Impact factor: 2.310
Authors: David M Melville; Jane Mohler; Mindy Fain; Amy E Muchna; Elizabeth Krupinski; Puneet Sharma; Mihra S Taljanovic Journal: Skeletal Radiol Date: 2016-01-07 Impact factor: 2.199
Authors: Deepak Kumar; Karupppasamy Subburaj; Wilson Lin; Dimitrios C Karampinos; Charles E McCulloch; Xiaojuan Li; Thomas M Link; Richard B Souza; Sharmila Majumdar Journal: J Orthop Sports Phys Ther Date: 2013-10-30 Impact factor: 4.751
Authors: Hugo Giambini; Taku Hatta; Krzysztof R Gorny; Per Widholm; Anette Karlsson; Olof D Leinhard; Mark C Adkins; Chunfeng Zhao; Kai-Nan An Journal: Muscle Nerve Date: 2017-05-15 Impact factor: 3.217
Authors: Sara Guerri; Daniele Mercatelli; Maria Pilar Aparisi Gómez; Alessandro Napoli; Giuseppe Battista; Giuseppe Guglielmi; Alberto Bazzocchi Journal: Quant Imaging Med Surg Date: 2018-02
Authors: L H Goldman; K Tang; L Facchetti; U Heilmeier; G B Joseph; M C Nevitt; C E McCulloch; R B Souza; T M Link Journal: Osteoarthritis Cartilage Date: 2016-07-25 Impact factor: 6.576