Literature DB >> 22410858

The effect of female height on reproductive success is negative in Western populations, but more variable in non-western populations.

Gert Stulp1, Simon Verhulst, Thomas V Pollet, Abraham P Buunk.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: In this article we examine the association between female height and reproductive success in a US sample and present a review of previous studies on this association. We also outline possible biological explanations for our findings.
METHODS: We used data from a long-term study of 5,326 female Wisconsin high school graduates to examine the association between female height and reproductive success. Twenty-one samples on this association were covered by our literature review.
RESULTS: Shorter women had more children surviving to age 18 than taller women, despite increased child mortality in shorter women. Taller women had a higher age at first birth and age at first marriage and reached a higher social status, but the negative effect of height on reproductive success persisted after controlling for these variables. However, while these effects were quite consistent in Western populations, they were not consistently present in non-Western populations. Our review also indicated that child mortality was almost universally higher among shorter women.
CONCLUSIONS: We conclude that shorter women have a higher number of live births but that final reproductive success depends on the positive effect of height on child survival.
Copyright © 2012 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22410858     DOI: 10.1002/ajhb.22252

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Hum Biol        ISSN: 1042-0533            Impact factor:   1.937


  13 in total

1.  Intralocus sexual conflict over human height.

Authors:  Gert Stulp; Bram Kuijper; Abraham P Buunk; Thomas V Pollet; Simon Verhulst
Journal:  Biol Lett       Date:  2012-08-08       Impact factor: 3.703

Review 2.  Developmental influences on fertility decisions by women: an evolutionary perspective.

Authors:  D A Coall; M Tickner; L S McAllister; P Sheppard
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2016-04-19       Impact factor: 6.237

3.  Does natural selection favour taller stature among the tallest people on earth?

Authors:  Gert Stulp; Louise Barrett; Felix C Tropf; Melinda Mills
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2015-05-07       Impact factor: 5.349

4.  The evolution of sex differences in disease.

Authors:  Edward H Morrow
Journal:  Biol Sex Differ       Date:  2015-03-13       Impact factor: 5.027

5.  Human height is positively related to interpersonal dominance in dyadic interactions.

Authors:  Gert Stulp; Abraham P Buunk; Simon Verhulst; Thomas V Pollet
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-02-26       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Human fertility, molecular genetics, and natural selection in modern societies.

Authors:  Felix C Tropf; Gert Stulp; Nicola Barban; Peter M Visscher; Jian Yang; Harold Snieder; Melinda C Mills
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-06-03       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  The adolescent transition under energetic stress: Body composition tradeoffs among adolescent women in The Gambia.

Authors:  Meredith W Reiches; Sophie E Moore; Andrew M Prentice; Ann Prentice; Yankuba Sawo; Peter T Ellison
Journal:  Evol Med Public Health       Date:  2013-04-09

8.  How does childhood socioeconomic hardship affect reproductive strategy? Pathways of development.

Authors:  Paula Sheppard; Mark S Pearce; Rebecca Sear
Journal:  Am J Hum Biol       Date:  2015-09-26       Impact factor: 1.937

9.  Sex-biased sound symbolism in english-language first names.

Authors:  Benjamin J Pitcher; Alex Mesoudi; Alan G McElligott
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-06-05       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Are human mating preferences with respect to height reflected in actual pairings?

Authors:  Gert Stulp; Abraham P Buunk; Thomas V Pollet; Daniel Nettle; Simon Verhulst
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-01-16       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.