Literature DB >> 22410550

Image inversion spectral-domain optical coherence tomography optimizes choroidal thickness and detail through improved contrast.

Phoebe Lin1, Priyatham S Mettu, Dustin L Pomerleau, Stephanie J Chiu, Ramiro Maldonado, Sandra Stinnett, Cynthia A Toth, Sina Farsiu, Prithvi Mruthyunjaya.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: This study was conducted to determine whether there were significant differences in choroidal thickness, contrast, outer choroidal vessel (OCV), and choroidal-scleral junction (CSJ) visualization in inverted versus upright spectral-domain optical coherence tomography (SD-OCT).
METHODS: Images were captured on Bioptigen SD-OCT, Zeiss Cirrus HD-OCT, and Heidelberg Spectralis in 42 eyes of 21 healthy subjects. Average choroidal thickness across a fovea-centered 4-mm segment was determined with MATLAB. Quantitative measures of choroidal contrast were measured and CSJ assessed by applying a score of 0 to 3. OCV was determined by counting choroidal vessels ≥ 200 μm.
RESULTS: Mean choroidal thickness was greater in inverted versus upright images captured by Bioptigen (P ≤ 0.003) and Spectralis (P ≤ 0.015). Choroidal thickness varied significantly between the three machines (P < 0.05). Contrast was higher in inverted versus upright images captured by Bioptigen (P ≤ 0.02) and Spectralis (P < 0.001), but not in Cirrus (P > 0.10, both observers). CSJ score was highest in the following: Spectralis inverted = Spectralis EDI > Cirrus upright > Bioptigen inverted. Mean OCV was highest in Spectralis inverted mode.
CONCLUSION: The most favorable modes to visualize CSJ and OCV are the Spectralis EDI, Spectralis inverted, Cirrus upright, and Bioptigen inverted. These modes demonstrate the highest outer choroidal contrast and choroidal thickness measurements. Choroidal thickness cannot be compared between machines due to conversion factor differences. Future studies and construction of automated segmentation and detection software should take these benefits and pitfalls into account.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22410550     DOI: 10.1167/iovs.11-9290

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci        ISSN: 0146-0404            Impact factor:   4.799


  15 in total

Review 1.  Enhanced depth imaging-OCT of the choroid: a review of the current literature.

Authors:  H Laviers; H Zambarakji
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2014-11-04       Impact factor: 3.117

2.  Quantitative classification of eyes with and without intermediate age-related macular degeneration using optical coherence tomography.

Authors:  Sina Farsiu; Stephanie J Chiu; Rachelle V O'Connell; Francisco A Folgar; Eric Yuan; Joseph A Izatt; Cynthia A Toth
Journal:  Ophthalmology       Date:  2013-08-29       Impact factor: 12.079

3.  Choroid development and feasibility of choroidal imaging in the preterm and term infants utilizing SD-OCT.

Authors:  Tomas A Moreno; Rachelle V O'Connell; Stephanie J Chiu; Sina Farsiu; Michelle T Cabrera; Ramiro S Maldonado; Du Tran-Viet; Sharon F Freedman; David K Wallace; Cynthia A Toth
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2013-06-14       Impact factor: 4.799

4.  Influence of choroidal thickness on subfoveal choroidal thickness measurement repeatability using enhanced depth imaging optical coherence tomography.

Authors:  A R Cho; Y J Choi; Y T Kim
Journal:  Eye (Lond)       Date:  2014-09-12       Impact factor: 3.775

5.  Refractive error and ocular parameters: comparison of two SD-OCT systems.

Authors:  Lisa A Ostrin; Jill Yuzuriha; Christine F Wildsoet
Journal:  Optom Vis Sci       Date:  2015-04       Impact factor: 1.973

6.  Modulating GLUT1 expression in retinal pigment epithelium decreases glucose levels in the retina: impact on photoreceptors and Müller glial cells.

Authors:  Aditi Swarup; Ivy S Samuels; Brent A Bell; John Y S Han; Jianhai Du; Erik Massenzio; E Dale Abel; Kathleen Boesze-Battaglia; Neal S Peachey; Nancy J Philp
Journal:  Am J Physiol Cell Physiol       Date:  2018-11-21       Impact factor: 4.249

7.  Lamina Cribrosa in Glaucoma: Diagnosis and Monitoring.

Authors:  Ricardo Y Abe; Carolina P B Gracitelli; Alberto Diniz-Filho; Andrew J Tatham; Felipe A Medeiros
Journal:  Curr Ophthalmol Rep       Date:  2015-06-01

8.  Repeatability of Choroidal Thickness Measurements on Enhanced Depth Imaging Optical Coherence Tomography Using Different Posterior Boundaries.

Authors:  Vivian S Vuong; Elad Moisseiev; David Cunefare; Sina Farsiu; Ala Moshiri; Glenn Yiu
Journal:  Am J Ophthalmol       Date:  2016-06-23       Impact factor: 5.258

9.  A simplified method to measure choroidal thickness using adaptive compensation in enhanced depth imaging optical coherence tomography.

Authors:  Preeti Gupta; Elizabeth Sidhartha; Michael J A Girard; Jean Martial Mari; Tien-Yin Wong; Ching-Yu Cheng
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-05-05       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Is handheld optical coherence tomography reliable in infants and young children with and without nystagmus?

Authors:  Helena Lee; Frank Proudlock; Irene Gottlob
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2013-12-17       Impact factor: 4.799

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.