Literature DB >> 22409858

Variation in thromboembolic complications among patients undergoing commonly performed cancer operations.

Randall R De Martino1, Philip P Goodney, Emily L Spangler, Jessica B Wallaert, Matthew A Corriere, Eva M Rzucidlo, Daniel B Walsh, David H Stone.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: There is widespread evidence that cancer confers an increased risk of deep venous thrombosis (DVT). This risk is thought to vary among different cancer types. The purpose of this study is to better define the incidence of thrombotic complications among patients undergoing surgical treatment for a spectrum of prevalent cancer diagnoses in contemporary practice.
METHODS: All patients undergoing one of 11 cancer surgical operations (breast resection, hysterectomy, prostatectomy, colectomy, gastrectomy, lung resection, hepatectomy, pancreatectomy, cystectomy, esophagectomy, and nephrectomy) were identified by Current Procedural Terminology and International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision codes using the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program database (2007-2009). The study endpoints were DVT, pulmonary embolism (PE), and overall postoperative venous thromboembolic events (VTE) within 1 month of the index procedure. Multivariate logistic regression was utilized to calculate adjusted odds ratios for each endpoint.
RESULTS: Over the study interval, 43,808 of the selected cancer operations were performed. The incidence of DVT, PE, and total VTE within 1 month following surgery varied widely across a spectrum of cancer diagnoses, ranging from 0.19%, 0.12%, and 0.28% for breast resection to 6.1%, 2.4%, and 7.3%, respectively, for esophagectomy. Compared with breast cancer, the incidence of VTE ranged from a 1.31-fold increase in VTE associated with gastrectomy (95% confidence interval, 0.73-2.37; P = .4) to a 2.68-fold increase associated with hysterectomy (95% confidence interval, 1.43-5.01; P = .002). Multivariate logistic regression revealed that inpatient status, steroid use, advanced age (≥60 years), morbid obesity (body mass index ≥35), blood transfusion, reintubation, cardiac arrest, postoperative infectious complications, and prolonged hospitalization were independently associated with increased risk of VTE.
CONCLUSIONS: The incidence of VTE and thromboembolic complications associated with cancer surgery varies substantially. These findings suggest that both tumor type and resection magnitude may impact VTE risk. Accordingly, such data support diagnosis and procedural-specific guidelines for perioperative VTE prophylaxis and can be used to anticipate the risk of potentially preventable morbidity.
Copyright © 2012 Society for Vascular Surgery. Published by Mosby, Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22409858      PMCID: PMC3339376          DOI: 10.1016/j.jvs.2011.10.129

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Vasc Surg        ISSN: 0741-5214            Impact factor:   4.268


  15 in total

1.  A clinical outcome-based prospective study on venous thromboembolism after cancer surgery: the @RISTOS project.

Authors:  Giancarlo Agnelli; Giorgio Bolis; Lorenzo Capussotti; Roberto Mario Scarpa; Francesco Tonelli; Erminio Bonizzoni; Marco Moia; Fabio Parazzini; Romina Rossi; Francesco Sonaglia; Bettina Valarani; Carlo Bianchini; Gualberto Gussoni
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2006-01       Impact factor: 12.969

2.  Risk factors for deep vein thrombosis and pulmonary embolism: a population-based case-control study.

Authors:  J A Heit; M D Silverstein; D N Mohr; T M Petterson; W M O'Fallon; L J Melton
Journal:  Arch Intern Med       Date:  2000-03-27

3.  Evaluation of perioperative fatal pulmonary embolism and death in cancer surgical patients: the MC-4 cancer substudy.

Authors:  Ajay K Kakkar; Sylvia Haas; Helmut Wolf; Albrecht Encke
Journal:  Thromb Haemost       Date:  2005-10       Impact factor: 5.249

4.  Rates of initial and recurrent thromboembolic disease among patients with malignancy versus those without malignancy. Risk analysis using Medicare claims data.

Authors:  N Levitan; A Dowlati; S C Remick; H I Tahsildar; L D Sivinski; R Beyth; A A Rimm
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  1999-09       Impact factor: 1.889

5.  Malignancies, prothrombotic mutations, and the risk of venous thrombosis.

Authors:  Jeanet W Blom; Carine J M Doggen; Susanne Osanto; Frits R Rosendaal
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2005-02-09       Impact factor: 56.272

6.  Trends in the incidence of deep vein thrombosis and pulmonary embolism: a 25-year population-based study.

Authors:  M D Silverstein; J A Heit; D N Mohr; T M Petterson; W M O'Fallon; L J Melton
Journal:  Arch Intern Med       Date:  1998-03-23

7.  Post-discharge venous thromboembolism after cancer surgery: extending the case for extended prophylaxis.

Authors:  Ryan P Merkow; Karl Y Bilimoria; Martin D McCarter; Mark E Cohen; Carlton C Barnett; Mehul V Raval; Joseph A Caprini; Howard S Gordon; Clifford Y Ko; David J Bentrem
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2011-07       Impact factor: 12.969

8.  Asymptomatic deep venous thrombosis in the trauma patient: is an aggressive screening protocol justified?

Authors:  L M Napolitano; V S Garlapati; S O Heard; W E Silva; B S Cutler; A M O'Neill; F A Anderson; H B Wheeler
Journal:  J Trauma       Date:  1995-10

9.  Deep vein thrombosis among patients entering cardiac rehabilitation after coronary artery bypass surgery.

Authors:  Marco Ambrosetti; Mario Salerno; Mara Zambelli; Filippo Mastropasqua; Roberto Tramarin; Roberto F E Pedretti
Journal:  Chest       Date:  2004-01       Impact factor: 9.410

10.  Excess length of stay, charges, and mortality attributable to medical injuries during hospitalization.

Authors:  Chunliu Zhan; Marlene R Miller
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2003-10-08       Impact factor: 56.272

View more
  44 in total

1.  Pharmacologic prophylaxis, postoperative INR, and risk of venous thromboembolism after hepatectomy.

Authors:  Hari Nathan; Matthew J Weiss; Gerald A Soff; Michelle Stempel; Ronald P Dematteo; Peter J Allen; T Peter Kingham; Yuman Fong; William R Jarnagin; Michael I D'Angelica
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2013-10-16       Impact factor: 3.452

2.  Peculiarities of the obese patient with cancer: a national consensus statement by the Spanish Society for the Study of Obesity and the Spanish Society of Medical Oncology.

Authors:  P Pérez-Segura; J E Palacio; L Vázquez; S Monereo; R de Las Peñas; P Martínez de Icaya; C Grávalos; A Lecube; A Blasco; J M García-Almeida; I Barneto; A Goday
Journal:  Clin Transl Oncol       Date:  2017-01-10       Impact factor: 3.405

Review 3.  The lung cancer nurse role in the management of paraneoplastic syndromes in lung cancer.

Authors:  John White
Journal:  Transl Lung Cancer Res       Date:  2016-06

4.  Infection and venous thromboembolism in patients undergoing colorectal surgery: what is the relationship?

Authors:  M Francesca Monn; Xuan Hui; Brandyn D Lau; Michael Streiff; Elliott R Haut; Elizabeth C Wick; Jonathan E Efron; Susan L Gearhart
Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum       Date:  2014-04       Impact factor: 4.585

5.  Defining incidence and risk factors of venous thromboemolism after hepatectomy.

Authors:  Aslam Ejaz; Gaya Spolverato; Yuhree Kim; Donald L Lucas; Brandyn Lau; Matthew Weiss; Fabian M Johnston; Marin Kheng; Marian Kheng; Kenzo Hirose; Christopher L Wolfgang; Elliott Haut; Timothy M Pawlik
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2013-12-13       Impact factor: 3.452

6.  Retrosternal Reconstruction Can be a Risk Factor for Upper Extremity Deep Vein Thrombosis After Esophagectomy.

Authors:  Takamasa Takahashi; Masahide Fukaya; Kazushi Miyata; Yayoi Sakatoku; Masato Nagino
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2017-12       Impact factor: 3.352

7.  Validating the role of ABO blood type in risk of perioperative venous thromboembolism after radical cystectomy.

Authors:  Sumeet Bhanvadia; Kayvan Kazerouni; Soroush T Bazargani; Gus Miranda; Jie Cai; Siamak Daneshmand; Hooman Djaladat
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2018-06-06       Impact factor: 4.226

8.  Low molecular weight heparin once versus twice for thromboprophylaxis following esophagectomy: a randomised, double-blind and placebo-controlled trial.

Authors:  Jie-Qiong Song; Li-Zhen Xuan; Wei Wu; Jun-Feng Huang; Ming Zhong
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2015-07       Impact factor: 2.895

9.  Venous thromboembolism after surgery for inflammatory bowel disease: are there modifiable risk factors? Data from ACS NSQIP.

Authors:  Jessica B Wallaert; Randall R De Martino; Priscilla S Marsicovetere; Philip P Goodney; Sam R G Finlayson; John J Murray; Stefan D Holubar
Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum       Date:  2012-11       Impact factor: 4.585

10.  Clinical analysis of tumor and non-tumor patients complicated with pulmonary embolism.

Authors:  Hong Wang; Yuan Huang; Chun-Wei Xu; Li Lin
Journal:  Int J Clin Exp Med       Date:  2015-10-15
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.