Literature DB >> 22409692

Medical device regulation in Australia: safe and effective?

Richard G McGee1, Angela C Webster, Thomas E Rogerson, Jonathan C Craig.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To describe the frequency, characteristics and outcomes of reports of possible harms related to medical devices submitted to the Australian Therapeutic Goods Administration (TGA) using data made publicly available on the TGA website. DESIGN AND
SETTING: A retrospective analysis, conducted in January 2012, of data made publicly available on the TGA website from January 2000 to December 2011. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The number and nature of reports of medical device incidents, recalls and alerts.
RESULTS: Up to December 2011, 6812 incidents involving medical devices were reported to the TGA, although there were several periods where data were unavailable. Incidents were reported more frequently in later years, most often by device sponsors, and were often attributed to mechanical problems. 295 deaths and 2357 serious injuries have been related to incidents, with serious injury (597) highest in 2009. Most incidents involving medical devices were not investigated (47.5%), or, after investigation, no further action was taken (25.0%). During the same time period, there were 35 medical device recalls and 34 medical device alerts issued by the TGA, with no consistent increase over time.
CONCLUSIONS: Despite TGA reform proposals, greater transparency is still needed. Issues that have not been addressed include patchy and conflicting data in the public domain and lack of explanations for the large proportion of uninvestigated reports. To maintain public confidence in the national regulatory system these problems need to be resolved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22409692     DOI: 10.5694/mja11.11261

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med J Aust        ISSN: 0025-729X            Impact factor:   7.738


  4 in total

1.  Should Medical Devices Be Regulated as Rigorously as Drugs?

Authors: 
Journal:  Can J Hosp Pharm       Date:  2019-10-21

2.  Joint registry approach for identification of outlier prostheses.

Authors:  Richard N de Steiger; Lisa N Miller; David C Davidson; Philip Ryan; Stephen E Graves
Journal:  Acta Orthop       Date:  2013-08       Impact factor: 3.717

Review 3.  Materiovigilance: An Indian perspective.

Authors:  Bikash Ranjan Meher
Journal:  Perspect Clin Res       Date:  2018 Oct-Dec

Review 4.  Challenges Associated with the Safety Signal Detection Process for Medical Devices.

Authors:  Josep Pane; Katia M C Verhamme; Dorian Villegas; Laura Gamez; Irene Rebollo; Miriam C J M Sturkenboom
Journal:  Med Devices (Auckl)       Date:  2021-02-24
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.