Literature DB >> 22409664

The pot calling the kettle black: distancing response to ethical dissonance.

Rachel Barkan1, Shahar Ayal, Francesca Gino, Dan Ariely.   

Abstract

Six studies demonstrate the "pot calling the kettle black" phenomenon whereby people are guilty of the very fault they identify in others. Recalling an undeniable ethical failure, people experience ethical dissonance between their moral values and their behavioral misconduct. Our findings indicate that to reduce ethical dissonance, individuals use a double-distancing mechanism. Using an overcompensating ethical code, they judge others more harshly and present themselves as more virtuous and ethical (Studies 1, 2, 3). We show this mechanism is exclusive for ethical dissonance and is not triggered by salience of ethicality (Study 4), general sense of personal failure, or ethically neutral cognitive dissonance (Study 5). Finally, it is characterized by some boundary conditions (Study 6). We discuss the theoretical contribution of this work to research on moral regulation and ethical behavior. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2012 APA, all rights reserved).

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22409664     DOI: 10.1037/a0027588

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Psychol Gen        ISSN: 0022-1015


  15 in total

1.  The relationship between attention allocation and cheating.

Authors:  Andrea Pittarello; Daphna Motro; Enrico Rubaltelli; Patrik Pluchino
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2016-04

2.  Memories of unethical actions become obfuscated over time.

Authors:  Maryam Kouchaki; Francesca Gino
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2016-05-16       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  Concerted Collusion: Studying Multiagency Institutional Cover-Up.

Authors:  Anthony Montgomery
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2022-06-16

4.  Common and distinct neural correlates of self-serving and prosocial dishonesty.

Authors:  Narun Pornpattananangkul; Shanshan Zhen; Rongjun Yu
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2018-03-26       Impact factor: 5.038

5.  The Moral Self-Image Scale: Measuring and Understanding the Malleability of the Moral Self.

Authors:  Jennifer Jordan; Marijke C Leliveld; Ann E Tenbrunsel
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2015-12-15

6.  Predicting self-reported research misconduct and questionable research practices in university students using an augmented Theory of Planned Behavior.

Authors:  Camilla J Rajah-Kanagasabai; Lynne D Roberts
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2015-04-30

7.  A Sorrow Shared Is a Sorrow Halved: Moral Judgments of Harm to Single versus Multiple Victims.

Authors:  Daffie Konis; Uriel Haran; Kelly Saporta; Shahar Ayal
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2016-08-02

8.  The Dark Side of Malleability: Incremental Theory Promotes Immoral Behaviors.

Authors:  Niwen Huang; Shijiang Zuo; Fang Wang; Pan Cai; Fengxiang Wang
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2017-08-07

9.  Editorial: Dishonest Behavior, from Theory to Practice.

Authors:  Shahar Ayal; Guy Hochman; Dan Ariely
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2016-09-30

10.  Are Some Countries More Honest than Others? Evidence from a Tax Compliance Experiment in Sweden and Italy.

Authors:  Giulia Andrighetto; Nan Zhang; Stefania Ottone; Ferruccio Ponzano; John D'Attoma; Sven Steinmo
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2016-04-07
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.