| Literature DB >> 22408307 |
Meva Lal Gupta1, S K Gupta, Chaturbhuja Bhuyan.
Abstract
Arsha (hemorrhoids) is engorgement of the hemorrhoidal venous plexus, characterized by bleeding per rectum, constipation, pain, prolapse and discharge. It is manifested due to improper diet, prolonged standing and faulty habits of defecation causing derangement of tridosha, mainly vata dosha. Vitiated dosha localizes in guda vali, pradhana dhamani and mansdhara kala and vitiates twak, mansa, meda and rakta, resulting in the annavaha sroto dushti. Modern management of arsha needs, mainly, a surgical approach, i.e. hemorrhoidectomy, wherein the result was found to be less satisfactory. In this regard, to determine a solution for satisfactory cure, the kshara sutra ligation method in arsha was studied in comparison with hemarrhoidectomy. Kshara sutra ligation in arsha was employed in 35 patients, and 26 patients were dealt with hemorrhoidectomy. The study revealed a better result of the kshara sutra ligation-treated group in comparison with hemorrhoidectomy. The observations revealed that maximum advantages like minimum hospital stay, no bleeding during or after operation, no post-operative anal stenosis, a low cost-effective and more acceptable to different categories of people, etc. were recorded in the kshara sutra-treated group. Statistically, kshara sutra ligation for arsha was found to be highly significant and effective management. No adverse effects were noted during the follow-up period.Entities:
Keywords: Arsha; hemorrhoidectomy; hemorrhoids; kshara sutra ligation
Year: 2011 PMID: 22408307 PMCID: PMC3296345 DOI: 10.4103/0974-8520.92591
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Ayu ISSN: 0974-8520
Criteria of assessment
Personal history-wise distribution of 61 patients of Arsha
Particulars related to disease
Effect of Kshara Sutra ligation on clinical feature of Arsha: n = 35
Effect of hemorrhoidectomy on the clinical features of Arsha: n = 26
Effect of therapy in Kshara Sutra ligation Group A and hemorrhoidectomy Group B
Comparative effect of treatment on cardinal symptoms in both groups
Size-wise removal of pile masses in both groups
Average time taken for removal of the KSL mass in group-A and group-B