Literature DB >> 22407309

Regulatory forum opinion piece: blind reading of histopathology slides in general toxicology studies.

Natasha Neef1, Kristen J Nikula, Sabine Francke-Carroll, Laura Boone.   

Abstract

With the intention of reducing bias, a recent European Food Safety Authority draft guidance document included a recommendation for blinded evaluation of histopathology slides in general toxicology studies (EFSA 2011). Although blinding as to treatment status reduces bias in many types of scientific experiment and is sometimes also appropriate in toxicologic pathology (Holland and Holland 2011), it is most unlikely to help achieve the overall goal of improved human safety when used for routine histopathology evaluation of tissues in general toxicology studies. This is the case because (1) blinding is not applicable to the inductive reasoning process used to identify test article effects in the tissues and would dramatically reduce the chances of these being successfully identified; and (2) in any case, the bias that would be reduced by blinding is actually a bias favoring diagnosis of a toxicological hazard and a conservative safety evaluation, which is appropriate in this context. Other unintended consequences of blinding histopathology evaluation include reductions in sensitivity for a variety of additional reasons and increased subjectivity of the pathology data.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22407309     DOI: 10.1177/0192623312438737

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Toxicol Pathol        ISSN: 0192-6233            Impact factor:   1.902


  4 in total

Review 1.  Statistical Guidance for Reviewers of Toxicologic Pathology.

Authors:  Keith R Shockley; Grace E Kissling
Journal:  Toxicol Pathol       Date:  2018-07-02       Impact factor: 1.902

2.  National Toxicology Program Position Statement on Informed ("Nonblinded") Analysis in Toxicologic Pathology Evaluation.

Authors:  Robert C Sills; Mark F Cesta; Cynthia J Willson; Amy E Brix; Brian R Berridge
Journal:  Toxicol Pathol       Date:  2019-09-15       Impact factor: 1.902

3.  Histology and Gadolinium Distribution in the Rodent Brain After the Administration of Cumulative High Doses of Linear and Macrocyclic Gadolinium-Based Contrast Agents.

Authors:  Jessica Lohrke; Anna-Lena Frisk; Thomas Frenzel; Laura Schöckel; Martin Rosenbruch; Gregor Jost; Diana Constanze Lenhard; Martin A Sieber; Volker Nischwitz; Astrid Küppers; Hubertus Pietsch
Journal:  Invest Radiol       Date:  2017-06       Impact factor: 6.016

Review 4.  Methodological Aspects for Preclinical Evaluation of Gadolinium Presence in Brain Tissue: Critical Appraisal and Suggestions for Harmonization-A Joint Initiative.

Authors:  Philippe Robert; Thomas Frenzel; Cécile Factor; Gregor Jost; Marlène Rasschaert; Gunnar Schuetz; Nathalie Fretellier; Janina Boyken; Jean-Marc Idée; Hubertus Pietsch
Journal:  Invest Radiol       Date:  2018-09       Impact factor: 6.016

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.