Literature DB >> 2240725

The diagnostic impact of prehospital 12-lead electrocardiography.

T P Aufderheide1, G E Hendley, R K Thakur, J R Mateer, H A Stueven, D W Olson, K M Hargarten, F Laitinen, N Robinson, K C Preuss.   

Abstract

STUDY HYPOTHESIS: It is feasible to apply prehospital 12-lead electrocardiography to most stable prehospital chest pain patients. Prehospital diagnostic accuracy is improved compared with single-lead telemetry. POPULATION: One-hundred sixty-six stable adult patients who sought paramedic evaluation for a chief complaint of nontraumatic chest pain.
METHODS: One-hundred fifty-one prehospital 12-lead ECGs of diagnostic quality were obtained by paramedics on 166 adult patients presenting with nontraumatic chest pain. Paramedics and base station physicians were blinded to the information on acquired prehospital 12-lead ECGs and treated patients according to current standard of care-clinical diagnosis and single-lead telemetry. Final hospital diagnoses were classified into three groups: acute myocardial infarction (24); suspected angina or ischemia (61); and nonischemic chest pain (66). Paramedics and base station physicians' clinical diagnoses and prehospital and emergency department ECGs were similarly classified and compared. Prehospital and ED 12-lead ECGs were read retrospectively by two cardiologists.
RESULTS: Paramedics achieved a high success rate (98.7%) in obtaining diagnostic quality prehospital 12-lead ECGs in 94.6% of eligible prehospital patients. For patients with acute myocardial infarction, prehospital ECG alone had significantly higher specificity than did the paramedic clinical diagnosis (99.2% vs 70.9%; P less than .001), and significantly higher positive predictive value (92.9% vs 32.7%; P less than .001). For patients with angina, combining the paramedic clinical diagnosis and the prehospital ECG significantly improved sensitivity (90.2% vs 62.3%; P less than .001) and increased negative predictive value (88.9% vs 71.3%; P less than .02) compared with paramedic clinical diagnosis alone. There was a high concordance between prehospital and ED ECG diagnosis (99.3% for acute myocardial infarction and 92.8% for angina). Furthermore, ten patients whose prehospital ECGs demonstrated ischemia and who had final hospital diagnoses of angina or acute myocardial infarction were mistriaged by paramedics and/or received no base station physician-directed therapy.
CONCLUSION: It is feasible to apply prehospital 12-lead electrocardiography to most stable prehospital chest pain patients. Prehospital 12-lead ECGs have the potential to significantly increase the diagnostic accuracy in chest pain patients, approach congruity with ED 12-lead ECG diagnoses, and may allow for consideration of altering and improving prehospital and hospital-based management in this patient population.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1990        PMID: 2240725     DOI: 10.1016/s0196-0644(05)82288-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Emerg Med        ISSN: 0196-0644            Impact factor:   5.721


  7 in total

1.  Understanding of sepsis among emergency medical services: a survey study.

Authors:  Christopher W Seymour; David Carlbom; Ruth A Engelberg; Jonathan Larsen; Eileen M Bulger; Michael K Copass; Thomas D Rea
Journal:  J Emerg Med       Date:  2011-11-08       Impact factor: 1.484

Review 2.  Prehospital thrombolysis: an idea whose time has come.

Authors:  C P Cannon; A J Sayah; R M Walls
Journal:  Clin Cardiol       Date:  1999-08       Impact factor: 2.882

3.  [Can we improve the management of acute coronary syndromes in primary care?].

Authors:  Manuel Piqué; Joan Torres; Begoña Balsera; Isabel Hernández; Antonio Miñano; Fernando Worner
Journal:  Aten Primaria       Date:  2010-04-24       Impact factor: 1.137

4.  Prehospital cardiac arrest outcome is adversely associated with antiarrythmic agent use, but not associated with presenting complaint or medical history.

Authors:  R B Vukmir
Journal:  Emerg Med J       Date:  2004-01       Impact factor: 2.740

5.  Improving risk classification of critical illness with biomarkers: a simulation study.

Authors:  Christopher W Seymour; Colin R Cooke; Zheyu Wang; Kathleen F Kerr; Donald M Yealy; Derek C Angus; Thomas D Rea; Jeremy M Kahn; Margaret S Pepe
Journal:  J Crit Care       Date:  2013-04-06       Impact factor: 3.425

6.  ANMCO/SIT Consensus Document: telemedicine for cardiovascular emergency networks.

Authors:  Pasquale Caldarola; Michele Massimo Gulizia; Domenico Gabrielli; Marco Sicuro; Luisa De Gennaro; Massimo Giammaria; Niccolò Brenno Grieco; Daniele Grosseto; Roberto Mantovan; Marco Mazzanti; Alberto Menotti; Natale Daniele Brunetti; Silva Severi; Giancarmine Russo; Gian Franco Gensini
Journal:  Eur Heart J Suppl       Date:  2017-05-02       Impact factor: 1.803

7.  Twelve-Lead Electrocardiogram Acquisition With a Patchy-Type Wireless Device in Ambulance Transport: Simulation-Based Randomized Controlled Trial.

Authors:  Sunyoung Yoon; Taerim Kim; Taehwan Roh; Hansol Chang; Sung Yeon Hwang; Hee Yoon; Tae Gun Shin; Min Seob Sim; Ik Joon Jo; Won Chul Cha
Journal:  JMIR Mhealth Uhealth       Date:  2021-04-01       Impact factor: 4.773

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.