Literature DB >> 22406460

Influenza A vaccines using linear expression cassettes delivered via electroporation afford full protection against challenge in a mouse model.

Xuefei Shen1, Jonas Söderholm, Feng Lin, Gary Kobinger, Alexander Bello, Derek A Gregg, Kate E Broderick, Niranjan Y Sardesai.   

Abstract

Alternative DNA vaccine constructs such as fully synthetic linear expressing cassettes (LECs) offer the advantage of accelerated manufacturing techniques as well as the lack of both antibiotic resistance genes and bacterial contaminants. The speed of manufacture makes LEC technology a possible future vaccination strategy for pandemic influenza outbreaks. Previously, we reported on a novel concept of DNA delivery to dermal tissue by a minimally invasive electroporation (EP) surface device powered using low voltage parameters. This device allows electroporation without penetration of electrodes into the skin. In addition to enhancing the delivery of traditional plasmid DNA vaccines, this device may also offer a safe, tolerable and efficient method to administer LECs. To assess immunogenicity and efficacy of EP-enhanced LEC delivery in mice, we designed and tested two influenza antigens in the form of LEC constructs delivered using the newly developed surface dermal EP device. Strong CTL and antibody responses were induced by the LEC versions of the DNA vaccine. When challenged with A/Canada/AB/RV1532/2009 viruses, mice immunized with LEC encoding the M2 and NP antigens recovered faster than naïve or mice immunized ID without EP. Mice immunized with equal-molar doses of LEC encoding the M2 and NP antigens demonstrated 100% survival following a lethal (100× LD50) challenge of the heterologuos and highly pathogenic H5N1 influenza virus (A/Vietnam/1203/04). These results suggest that influenza DNA vaccines based on LEC technology combined with the surface delivery platform are capable of fully protecting mice in a lethal challenge and the LEC based DNA constructs may serve as viable vaccine candidates.
Copyright © 2012 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22406460     DOI: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2012.02.071

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Vaccine        ISSN: 0264-410X            Impact factor:   3.641


  18 in total

Review 1.  Traditional and new influenza vaccines.

Authors:  Sook-San Wong; Richard J Webby
Journal:  Clin Microbiol Rev       Date:  2013-07       Impact factor: 26.132

Review 2.  Fast vaccine design and development based on correlates of protection (COPs).

Authors:  Cécile van Els; Siri Mjaaland; Lisbeth Næss; Julia Sarkadi; Eva Gonczol; Karen Smith Korsholm; Jon Hansen; Jørgen de Jonge; Gideon Kersten; Jennifer Warner; Amanda Semper; Corine Kruiswijk; Fredrik Oftung
Journal:  Hum Vaccin Immunother       Date:  2014       Impact factor: 3.452

3.  A multi-head intradermal electroporation device allows for tailored and increased dose DNA vaccine delivery to the skin.

Authors:  Jay R McCoy; Janess M Mendoza; Kristin W Spik; Catherine Badger; Alan F Gomez; Connie S Schmaljohn; Niranjan Y Sardesai; Kate E Broderick
Journal:  Hum Vaccin Immunother       Date:  2015       Impact factor: 3.452

Review 4.  Synthetic DNA approach to cytomegalovirus vaccine/immune therapy.

Authors:  Stephan J Wu; Daniel O Villarreal; Devon J Shedlock; David B Weiner
Journal:  Adv Exp Med Biol       Date:  2015       Impact factor: 2.622

5.  Induction of Broad-Based Immunity and Protective Efficacy by Self-amplifying mRNA Vaccines Encoding Influenza Virus Hemagglutinin.

Authors:  Michela Brazzoli; Diletta Magini; Alessandra Bonci; Scilla Buccato; Cinzia Giovani; Roland Kratzer; Vanessa Zurli; Simona Mangiavacchi; Daniele Casini; Luis M Brito; Ennio De Gregorio; Peter W Mason; Jeffrey B Ulmer; Andrew J Geall; Sylvie Bertholet
Journal:  J Virol       Date:  2015-10-14       Impact factor: 5.103

Review 6.  Cytomegalovirus Vaccines: Current Status and Future Prospects.

Authors:  K M Anderholm; C J Bierle; M R Schleiss
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  2016-11       Impact factor: 9.546

Review 7.  Daedalic DNA vaccination against self antigens as a treatment for chronic kidney disease.

Authors:  Yuan Min Wang; Jimmy Jianheng Zhou; Ya Wang; Debbie Watson; Geoff Yu Zhang; Min Hu; Huiling Wu; Guoping Zheng; Yiping Wang; Anne M Durkan; David C H Harris; Stephen I Alexander
Journal:  Int J Clin Exp Pathol       Date:  2013-02-15

8.  Electroporation mediated DNA vaccination directly to a mucosal surface results in improved immune responses.

Authors:  Gleb Kichaev; Janess M Mendoza; Dinah Amante; Trevor R F Smith; Jay R McCoy; Niranjan Y Sardesai; Kate E Broderick
Journal:  Hum Vaccin Immunother       Date:  2013-06-11       Impact factor: 3.452

9.  Coalesced thermal and electrotransfer mediated delivery of plasmid DNA to the skin.

Authors:  Anna Bulysheva; James Hornef; Chelsea Edelblute; Chunqi Jiang; Karl Schoenbach; Cathryn Lundberg; Muhammad Arif Malik; Richard Heller
Journal:  Bioelectrochemistry       Date:  2018-10-23       Impact factor: 5.373

10.  Antibody-dependent cellular cytotoxicity is associated with control of pandemic H1N1 influenza virus infection of macaques.

Authors:  Sinthujan Jegaskanda; Jason T Weinfurter; Thomas C Friedrich; Stephen J Kent
Journal:  J Virol       Date:  2013-03-06       Impact factor: 5.103

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.