BACKGROUND: The efficacy of biventricular (BiV) pacing in patients with a narrow or moderately prolonged QRS duration remains questionable. OBJECTIVE: To assess the hypothesis that electrical dyssynchrony is required to obtain hemodynamic benefit from BiV pacing by investigating the relationship between intrinsic QRS duration and hemodynamic response to BiV pacing in a patient population covering a broad spectrum of QRS duration. METHODS: Eighty-two consecutive heart failure patients underwent cardiac resynchronization therapy implantation irrespective of their QRS duration. Thirty-four patients had a narrow QRS duration (<120 ms), whereas 11 patients had a moderately prolonged QRS duration (≥120 to <150 ms) and 37 patients had a severely prolonged QRS duration (≥150 ms). After implantation, invasive left ventricular (LV) dP/dt measurements were compared between intrinsic rhythm and simultaneous BiV pacing with an optimized atrioventricular delay. RESULTS: A high correlation (r = .65; P < .001) was observed between baseline QRS duration and changes in LV dP/dt(max) induced by BiV pacing. BiV pacing was ineffective in patients with a narrow QRS duration (+0.4% ± 6.1%; P = ns). No significant increase in LV dP/dt(max) was observed in patients with a QRS duration of ≥120 to <150 ms (+4.4% ± 6.9%; P = .06), whereas patients with a QRS duration of ≥150 ms exhibited a significant increase in LV dP/dt(max) (+17.1% ± 13.4%; P <.001). Only 9% of the patients with a narrow QRS duration exhibited a ≥10% increase in LV dP/dt(max). CONCLUSIONS: Baseline QRS duration is linearly related to acute hemodynamic response to BiV pacing. Patients with a narrow QRS duration do not derive hemodynamic improvement. This improvement is also limited in patients with a moderately prolonged QRS duration, raising questions about the potential clinical benefit of this therapy in these patients.
BACKGROUND: The efficacy of biventricular (BiV) pacing in patients with a narrow or moderately prolonged QRS duration remains questionable. OBJECTIVE: To assess the hypothesis that electrical dyssynchrony is required to obtain hemodynamic benefit from BiV pacing by investigating the relationship between intrinsic QRS duration and hemodynamic response to BiV pacing in a patient population covering a broad spectrum of QRS duration. METHODS: Eighty-two consecutive heart failurepatients underwent cardiac resynchronization therapy implantation irrespective of their QRS duration. Thirty-four patients had a narrow QRS duration (<120 ms), whereas 11 patients had a moderately prolonged QRS duration (≥120 to <150 ms) and 37 patients had a severely prolonged QRS duration (≥150 ms). After implantation, invasive left ventricular (LV) dP/dt measurements were compared between intrinsic rhythm and simultaneous BiV pacing with an optimized atrioventricular delay. RESULTS: A high correlation (r = .65; P < .001) was observed between baseline QRS duration and changes in LVdP/dt(max) induced by BiV pacing. BiV pacing was ineffective in patients with a narrow QRS duration (+0.4% ± 6.1%; P = ns). No significant increase in LVdP/dt(max) was observed in patients with a QRS duration of ≥120 to <150 ms (+4.4% ± 6.9%; P = .06), whereas patients with a QRS duration of ≥150 ms exhibited a significant increase in LVdP/dt(max) (+17.1% ± 13.4%; P <.001). Only 9% of the patients with a narrow QRS duration exhibited a ≥10% increase in LVdP/dt(max). CONCLUSIONS: Baseline QRS duration is linearly related to acute hemodynamic response to BiV pacing. Patients with a narrow QRS duration do not derive hemodynamic improvement. This improvement is also limited in patients with a moderately prolonged QRS duration, raising questions about the potential clinical benefit of this therapy in these patients.
Authors: Larisa G Tereshchenko; Alan Cheng; Jason Park; Nicholas Wold; Timothy E Meyer; Michael R Gold; Suneet Mittal; Jagmeet Singh; Kenneth M Stein; Kenneth A Ellenbogen Journal: Heart Rhythm Date: 2015-08-10 Impact factor: 6.343
Authors: Jonatan Jacobsson; Rasmus Borgquist; Christian Reitan; Elyar Ghafoori; Neal A Chatterjee; Muammar Kabir; Pyotr G Platonov; Jonas Carlson; Jagmeet P Singh; Larisa G Tereshchenko Journal: Am J Cardiol Date: 2016-05-14 Impact factor: 2.778
Authors: Jorge Gómez-Flores; Jovana Pérez-Báez; Guillermo Muñoz; Gabriela Bustillos-García; Alan García; Álvaro E Reyes-Quintero; Rosa M Ávila-Ocampo; Antonio Arias-Godínez; Manlio Márquez; Luis Colin-Lizalde; Moisés Levinstein-Jacinto; José L Morales-Velázquez; Santiago Nava Journal: Arch Cardiol Mex Date: 2021