Literature DB >> 22405473

Comparison of alfaxalone and propofol administered as total intravenous anaesthesia for ovariohysterectomy in dogs.

Martin A Suarez1, Brighton T Dzikiti, Frik G Stegmann, Marthinus Hartman.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To compare the anaesthetic and cardiopulmonary effects of alfaxalone with propofol when used for total intravenous anaesthesia (TIVA) during ovariohysterectomy in dogs. STUDY
DESIGN: A prospective non-blinded randomized clinical study. ANIMALS: Fourteen healthy female crossbred bitches, aged 0.5-5 years and weight 16-42 kg.
METHODS: Dogs were premedicated with acepromazine 0.01 mg kg(-1) and morphine 0.4 mg kg(-1). Anaesthesia was induced and maintained with either propofol or alfaxalone to effect for tracheal intubation followed by an infusion of the same agent. Dogs breathed spontaneously via a 'circle' circuit, with oxygen supplementation. Cardiopulmonary parameters (respiratory and heart rates, end-tidal carbon dioxide, tidal volume, and invasive blood pressures) were measured continuously and recorded at intervals related to the surgical procedure. Arterial blood samples were analysed for blood gas values. Quality of induction and recovery, and recovery times were determined. Non-parametric data were tested for significant differences between groups using the Mann-Whitney U-test and repeatedly measured data (normally distributed) for significant differences between and within groups by anova.
RESULTS: Both propofol and alphaxalone injection and subsequent infusions resulted in smooth, rapid induction and satisfactory maintenance of anaesthesia. Doses for induction (mean ± SD) were 5.8 ± 0.30 and 1.9 ± 0.07 mg kg(-1) and for the CRIs, 0.37 ± 0.09 and 0.11 ± 0.01 mg kg(-1) per minute for propofol and alfaxalone respectively. Median (IQR) recovery times were to sternal 45 (33-69) and 60 (46-61) and to standing 74 (69-76) and 90 (85-107) for propofol and alphaxalone respectively. Recovery quality was good. Cardiopulmonary effects did not differ between groups. Hypoventilation occurred in both groups. CONCLUSIONS AND CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Following premedication with acepromazine and morphine, both propofol and alphaxalone produce good quality anaesthesia adequate for ovariohysterectomy. Hypoventilation occurs suggesting a need for ventilatory support during prolonged infusion periods with either anaesthetic agent.
© 2012 The Authors. Veterinary Anaesthesia and Analgesia. © 2012 Association of Veterinary Anaesthetists and the American College of Veterinary Anesthesiologists.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22405473     DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-2995.2011.00700.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Vet Anaesth Analg        ISSN: 1467-2987            Impact factor:   1.648


  10 in total

Review 1.  Partial intravenous anesthesia in cats and dogs.

Authors:  Tanya Duke
Journal:  Can Vet J       Date:  2013-03       Impact factor: 1.008

2.  Cardiopulmonary Effects of a Partial Intravenous Anesthesia Technique for Laboratory Swine.

Authors:  Justin D Duval; Jessica M Pang; Søren R Boysen; Nigel A Caulkett
Journal:  J Am Assoc Lab Anim Sci       Date:  2018-06-22       Impact factor: 1.232

3.  Determination of the minimum infusion rate of alfaxalone during its co-administration with midazolam in goats.

Authors:  T B Dzikiti; P S Ndawana; G Zeiler; L Bester; L N Dzikiti
Journal:  Vet Rec Open       Date:  2015-02-25

4.  Changes in Hematological and Biochemical Profiles in Ovariohysterectomized Bitches Using an Alfaxalone-Midazolam-Morphine-Sevoflurane Protocol.

Authors:  Mónica Rubio; Katiuska Satué; José María Carrillo; Ángel Hernández Guerra; Belén Cuervo; Deborah Chicharro; Elena Damiá; Ayla Del Romero; Joaquín Sopena
Journal:  Animals (Basel)       Date:  2022-04-02       Impact factor: 2.752

5.  Maternal and foetal cardiovascular effects of the anaesthetic alfaxalone in 2-hydroxypropyl-β-cyclodextrin in the pregnant ewe.

Authors:  Anna Andaluz; Laura Santos; Félix García; Rosa I Ferrer; Laura Fresno; Xavier Moll
Journal:  ScientificWorldJournal       Date:  2013-10-24

6.  Cardiorespiratory and anesthetic effects of combined alfaxalone, butorphanol, and medetomidine in Thoroughbred horses.

Authors:  Hajime Ohmura; Atsushi Okano; Kazutaka Mukai; Kentaro Fukuda; Toshiyuki Takahashi
Journal:  J Equine Sci       Date:  2016-04-12

7.  Clinico-anesthetic changes following administration of propofol alone and in combination of meperidine and pentazocine lactate in dogs.

Authors:  A K Anandmay; L L Dass; A K Sharma; M K Gupta; K K Singh; B K Roy
Journal:  Vet World       Date:  2016-11-02

8.  Total injectable anesthesia of dogs and cats for remote location veterinary sterilization clinic.

Authors:  Lysa Pam Posner; Jeffrey Applegate; Allen Cannedy; Diane Deresienski; Kristie Mozzachio; Maria Serrano; Gregory Lewbart
Journal:  BMC Vet Res       Date:  2020-08-24       Impact factor: 2.741

9.  Anaesthetic induction and recovery characteristics of a diazepam-ketamine combination compared with propofol in dogs.

Authors:  Jacques P Ferreira; T Brighton Dzikit; Gareth E Zeiler; Roxanne Buck; Bruce Nevill; Bruce Gummow; Lynette Bester
Journal:  J S Afr Vet Assoc       Date:  2015-06-01       Impact factor: 1.474

10.  Reasons for Exclusion of Apparently Healthy Mature Adult and Senior Dogs From a Clinical Trial.

Authors:  Nicole H Gibbs; Hannah Michalski; Daniel E L Promislow; Matt Kaeberlein; Kate E Creevy
Journal:  Front Vet Sci       Date:  2021-06-02
  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.