Literature DB >> 22405153

Variation in state unintended pregnancy rates in the United States.

Kathryn Kost1, Lawrence B Finer, Susheela Singh.   

Abstract

CONTEXT: Newly available data show large differences in rates of unintended pregnancy across states. Because key policy and program decisions that could affect these rates are made by state governments, it is important to assess whether characteristics of the states are associated with this variation.
METHODS: Regression analysis was used to assess the relationship between the variation in state unintended pregnancy rates in 2006 and state-level aggregate measures of demographic composition, socioeconomic conditions, contraceptive use, and funding of and access to family planning services.
RESULTS: State unintended pregnancy rates were positively associated with the proportion of resident women who were black or Hispanic. However, these associations were almost entirely accounted for by differences in the age and marital status of women, the proportion without health insurance and the proportion receiving Medicaid. In addition, these last two measures were strongly associated with state unintended pregnancy rates after the other measures were controlled for: An increase in the proportion of women uninsured was associated with elevated unintended pregnancy rates, and an increase in the proportion receiving Medicaid coverage was associated with reduced rates.
CONCLUSIONS: State programs and policies should pay particular attention to increasing support for family planning services for minority groups. Findings also suggest that insurance coverage and receipt of Medicaid among women of reproductive age deserve further exploration as potentially important mechanisms for reducing state unintended pregnancy rates.
Copyright © 2012 by the Guttmacher Institute.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22405153     DOI: 10.1363/4405712

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Perspect Sex Reprod Health        ISSN: 1538-6341


  17 in total

1.  Unplanned pregnancy in adolescents: association with family structure, employed mother, and female friends with health-risk habits and behaviors.

Authors:  Francisco Vázquez-Nava; Carlos F Vázquez-Rodriguez; Atenógenes H Saldívar-González; Eliza M Vázquez-Rodríguez; José A Córdova-Fernández; Jorge Felizardo-Ávalos; Wilberto Sánchez-Márquez
Journal:  J Urban Health       Date:  2014-02       Impact factor: 3.671

2.  Tobacco and alcohol use in adolescents with unplanned pregnancies: relation with family structure, tobacco and alcohol use at home and by friends.

Authors:  Vazquez-Nava Francisco; Vazquez-Rodríguez Carlos; Vazquez-Rodriguez Eliza; Castillo-Ruiz Octelina; Iribar Ibabe Maria
Journal:  Afr Health Sci       Date:  2016-03       Impact factor: 0.927

3.  A population-based study of US women's preferred versus usual sources of reproductive health care.

Authors:  Kelli Stidham Hall; Elizabeth W Patton; Halley P Crissman; Melissa K Zochowski; Vanessa K Dalton
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2015-04-30       Impact factor: 8.661

4.  Medicaid Expansion at Title X Clinics: Client Volume, Payer Mix, and Contraceptive Method Type.

Authors:  Michel Boudreaux; Yoon Sun Choi; Liyang Xie; Daniel Marthey
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  2019-06       Impact factor: 2.983

5.  Factors associated with young adults' pregnancy likelihood.

Authors:  Melanie L Kornides; Panagiota Kitsantas; Lisa L Lindley; Huichuan Wu
Journal:  J Midwifery Womens Health       Date:  2015 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 2.388

6.  Social disparities in women's health service use in the United States: a population-based analysis.

Authors:  Kelli Stidham Hall; Vanessa Dalton; Timothy R B Johnson
Journal:  Ann Epidemiol       Date:  2013-11-08       Impact factor: 3.797

7.  Challenging unintended pregnancy as an indicator of reproductive autonomy.

Authors:  Joseph E Potter; Amanda Jean Stevenson; Kate Coleman-Minahan; Kristine Hopkins; Kari White; Sarah E Baum; Daniel Grossman
Journal:  Contraception       Date:  2019-03-07       Impact factor: 3.375

8.  Contraceptive counseling and postpartum contraceptive use.

Authors:  Lauren B Zapata; Sarah Murtaza; Maura K Whiteman; Denise J Jamieson; Cheryl L Robbins; Polly A Marchbanks; Denise V D'Angelo; Kathryn M Curtis
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2014-08-02       Impact factor: 8.661

9.  Variation in postpartum contraceptive method use: results from the Pregnancy Risk Assessment Monitoring System (PRAMS).

Authors:  Kari White; Joseph E Potter; Kristine Hopkins; Daniel Grossman
Journal:  Contraception       Date:  2013-10-22       Impact factor: 3.375

10.  Socioeconomic Status, Alcohol Use, and Pregnancy Intention in a National Sample of Women.

Authors:  Leigh E Tenkku Lepper; Angela Lluka; Allese Mayer; Niral Patel; Joanne Salas; Pamela K Xaverius; Brittney Kramer
Journal:  Prev Sci       Date:  2016-01
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.