BACKGROUND/AIMS: Mini-laparoscopy (ML) allows macroscopic assessment and biopsy under direct vision and therefore is a valuable technique in the diagnosis of liver disease. Herein we report procedure-related complications and risk factors. METHODS: A total of 2731 consecutive patients underwent diagnostic ML at two university hospitals (June 1996-December 2007). ML was performed using standard technique with a 1.9mm optical instrument. Coagulation of the liver biopsy site was performed with APC. The following variables were analysed as risk factors for complications: platelet count (<50/nL), international normalized ratio (INR) (>1.5), Cirrhosis, signs of portal hypertension, prior abdominal surgery. RESULTS: Major complications occurred in 1.0% (n=27) of patients and these were, delayed bleeding from the liver biopsy site or abdominal wall (in 0.7% of patients) and intestinal perforation (in 0.3% of patients). Two patients died after severe haemorrhage (mortality 0.07%); the other patients recovered without sequelae. Bleeding risk was increased in patients with low platelets (OR=6.1), increased INR (OR=8.9), cirrhosis (OR=1.9) and portal hypertension (OR=2.1). Logistic regression showed a significant correlation only for the concurrence of low platelets and increased INR (P = 0.001; OR=14.1); bootstrap analysis identified INR >1.5 as significant predictor (P = 0.0002). Prior abdominal surgery did not carry a significant risk for intestinal perforation (OR=1.1; P = 0.142), unless abdominal adhesions were present (OR=9.5; P = 0.0002). None of the patients required surgery for intestinal perforation. CONCLUSION: Mini-laparoscopy is a diagnostic technique with a low complication rate. However, in patients with increased INR, low platelets or after extensive abdominal surgery, complications may occur in up to 5%.
BACKGROUND/AIMS: Mini-laparoscopy (ML) allows macroscopic assessment and biopsy under direct vision and therefore is a valuable technique in the diagnosis of liver disease. Herein we report procedure-related complications and risk factors. METHODS: A total of 2731 consecutive patients underwent diagnostic ML at two university hospitals (June 1996-December 2007). ML was performed using standard technique with a 1.9mm optical instrument. Coagulation of the liver biopsy site was performed with APC. The following variables were analysed as risk factors for complications: platelet count (<50/nL), international normalized ratio (INR) (>1.5), Cirrhosis, signs of portal hypertension, prior abdominal surgery. RESULTS: Major complications occurred in 1.0% (n=27) of patients and these were, delayed bleeding from the liver biopsy site or abdominal wall (in 0.7% of patients) and intestinal perforation (in 0.3% of patients). Two patients died after severe haemorrhage (mortality 0.07%); the other patients recovered without sequelae. Bleeding risk was increased in patients with low platelets (OR=6.1), increased INR (OR=8.9), cirrhosis (OR=1.9) and portal hypertension (OR=2.1). Logistic regression showed a significant correlation only for the concurrence of low platelets and increased INR (P = 0.001; OR=14.1); bootstrap analysis identified INR >1.5 as significant predictor (P = 0.0002). Prior abdominal surgery did not carry a significant risk for intestinal perforation (OR=1.1; P = 0.142), unless abdominal adhesions were present (OR=9.5; P = 0.0002). None of the patients required surgery for intestinal perforation. CONCLUSION: Mini-laparoscopy is a diagnostic technique with a low complication rate. However, in patients with increased INR, low platelets or after extensive abdominal surgery, complications may occur in up to 5%.
Authors: Hanno Ehlken; Raluca Wroblewski; Christophe Corpechot; Lionel Arrivé; Tim Rieger; Johannes Hartl; Susanne Lezius; Peter Hübener; Kornelius Schulze; Roman Zenouzi; Marcial Sebode; Moritz Peiseler; Ulrike W Denzer; Alexander Quaas; Christina Weiler-Normann; Ansgar W Lohse; Olivier Chazouilleres; Christoph Schramm Journal: PLoS One Date: 2016-10-10 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Sarah Keller; Annette Aigner; Roman Zenouzi; Anne C Kim; Arnoud Meijer; Sören A Weidemann; Till Krech; Ansgar W Lohse; Gerhard Adam; Christoph Schramm; Jin Yamamura Journal: PLoS One Date: 2018-03-07 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Tom Diedrich; Silke Kummer; Antonio Galante; Andreas Drolz; Veronika Schlicker; Ansgar W Lohse; Johannes Kluwe; Johanna Maria Eberhard; Julian Schulze Zur Wiesch Journal: PLoS One Date: 2020-03-13 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Natascha Ndzedzeka-Völz; Thomas Theo Brehm; Malte Wehmeyer; Martin Christner; Till Sebastian Clauditz; Peter Hübener; Marylyn M Addo; Ansgar W Lohse; Stefan Schmiedel Journal: Surg Endosc Date: 2022-10-13 Impact factor: 3.453
Authors: James Neuberger; Jai Patel; Helen Caldwell; Susan Davies; Vanessa Hebditch; Coral Hollywood; Stefan Hubscher; Salil Karkhanis; Will Lester; Nicholas Roslund; Rebecca West; Judith I Wyatt; Mathis Heydtmann Journal: Gut Date: 2020-05-28 Impact factor: 23.059