Literature DB >> 22404916

Snake-venom resistance as a mammalian trophic adaptation: lessons from didelphid marsupials.

Robert S Voss1, Sharon A Jansa.   

Abstract

Mammals that prey on venomous snakes include several opossums (Didelphidae), at least two hedgehogs (Erinaceidae), several mongooses (Herpestidae), several mustelids, and some skunks (Mephitidae). As a group, these taxa do not share any distinctive morphological traits. Instead, mammalian adaptations for ophiophagy seem to consist only in the ability to resist the toxic effects of snake venom. Molecular mechanisms of venom resistance (as indicated by biochemical research on opossums, mongooses, and hedgehogs) include toxin-neutralizing serum factors and adaptive changes in venom-targeted molecules. Of these, toxin-neutralizing serum factors have received the most research attention to date. All of the toxin-neutralizing serum proteins discovered so far in both opossums and mongooses are human α1B-glycoprotein homologs that inhibit either snake-venom metalloproteinases or phospholipase A(2) myotoxins. By contrast, adaptive changes in venom-targeted molecules have received far less attention. The best-documented examples include amino-acid substitutions in mongoose nicotinic acetylcholine receptor that inhibit binding by α-neurotoxins, and amino-acid substitutions in opossum von Willebrand factor (vWF) that are hypothesized to weaken the bond between vWF and coagulopathic C-type lectins. Although multiple mechanisms of venom resistance are known from some species, the proteomic complexity of most snake venoms suggests that the evolved biochemical defences of ophiophagous mammals are likely to be far more numerous than currently recognized. Whereas most previous research in this field has been motivated by the potential for medical applications, venom resistance in ophiophagous mammals is a complex adaptation that merits attention from comparative biologists. Unfortunately, evolutionary inference is currently limited by ignorance about many relevant facts that can only be provided by future research.
© 2012 The Authors. Biological Reviews © 2012 Cambridge Philosophical Society.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22404916     DOI: 10.1111/j.1469-185X.2012.00222.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc        ISSN: 0006-3231


  12 in total

1.  The roles of balancing selection and recombination in the evolution of rattlesnake venom.

Authors:  Drew R Schield; Blair W Perry; Richard H Adams; Matthew L Holding; Zachary L Nikolakis; Siddharth S Gopalan; Cara F Smith; Joshua M Parker; Jesse M Meik; Michael DeGiorgio; Stephen P Mackessy; Todd A Castoe
Journal:  Nat Ecol Evol       Date:  2022-07-18       Impact factor: 19.100

2.  Evaluating local adaptation of a complex phenotype: reciprocal tests of pigmy rattlesnake venoms on treefrog prey.

Authors:  Sarah A Smiley-Walters; Terence M Farrell; H Lisle Gibbs
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2017-05-17       Impact factor: 3.225

3.  IgE antibodies, FcεRIα, and IgE-mediated local anaphylaxis can limit snake venom toxicity.

Authors:  Philipp Starkl; Thomas Marichal; Nicolas Gaudenzio; Laurent Lionel Reber; Riccardo Sibilano; Mindy Tsai; Stephen Joseph Galli
Journal:  J Allergy Clin Immunol       Date:  2015-09-26       Impact factor: 10.793

4.  Strike fast, strike hard: the red-throated caracara exploits absconding behavior of social wasps during nest predation.

Authors:  Sean McCann; Onour Moeri; Tanya Jones; Catherine Scott; Grigori Khaskin; Regine Gries; Sean O'Donnell; Gerhard Gries
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-12-26       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Uncovering Trypanosoma spp. diversity of wild mammals by the use of DNA from blood clots.

Authors:  Marina Silva Rodrigues; Luciana Lima; Samanta Cristina das Chagas Xavier; Heitor Miraglia Herrera; Fabiana Lopes Rocha; André Luiz Rodrigues Roque; Marta Maria Geraldes Teixeira; Ana Maria Jansen
Journal:  Int J Parasitol Parasites Wildl       Date:  2019-02-14       Impact factor: 2.674

6.  Comparative compositional and functional analyses of Bothrops moojeni specimens reveal several individual variations.

Authors:  Weslei da Silva Aguiar; Nathália da Costa Galizio; Caroline Serino-Silva; Sávio Stefanini Sant'Anna; Kathleen Fernandes Grego; Alexandre Keiji Tashima; Erika Sayuri Nishiduka; Karen de Morais-Zani; Anita Mitico Tanaka-Azevedo
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-09-12       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Epidemiology, Clinical Features, and Management of Texas Coral Snake (Micrurus tener) Envenomations Reported to the North American Snakebite Registry.

Authors:  Spencer Greene; Anne-Michelle Ruha; Sharan Campleman; Jeffrey Brent; Paul Wax
Journal:  J Med Toxicol       Date:  2020-08-14

Review 8.  Natural Inhibitors of Snake Venom Metalloendopeptidases: History and Current Challenges.

Authors:  Viviane A Bastos; Francisco Gomes-Neto; Jonas Perales; Ana Gisele C Neves-Ferreira; Richard H Valente
Journal:  Toxins (Basel)       Date:  2016-08-26       Impact factor: 4.546

9.  Arizona bark scorpion venom resistance in the pallid bat, Antrozous pallidus.

Authors:  Bradley H Hopp; Ryan S Arvidson; Michael E Adams; Khaleel A Razak
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-08-30       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Receptor variability-driven evolution of snake toxins.

Authors:  Xian-Hong Ji; Shang-Fei Zhang; Bin Gao; Shun-Yi Zhu
Journal:  Zool Res       Date:  2018-11-18
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.