Literature DB >> 22404602

Foundational issues in risk assessment and risk management.

Terje Aven1.   

Abstract

In spite of the maturity reached by many of the methods used in risk assessment and risk management, broad consensus has not been established on fundamental concepts and principles. The risk fields still suffer from a lack of clarity on many key scientific pillars. The purpose of this article is to point to this situation and through some illustrating examples discuss the challenges that the fields here face. Moreover, the purpose of the article is to reflect on how to improve the present situation and enhance the risk fields. We argue that the establishment of some common scientific pillars as well as a strong and continuous research focus on foundational issues are critical success factors. The article specifically addresses the role of the peer-reviewed journals and the international standards in the fields. We hope that the article can contribute to a revitalization of the discussion of foundational issues in risk assessment and risk management.
© 2012 Society for Risk Analysis.

Year:  2012        PMID: 22404602     DOI: 10.1111/j.1539-6924.2012.01798.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Risk Anal        ISSN: 0272-4332            Impact factor:   4.000


  2 in total

1.  Toward a Commonly Shared Public Policy Perspective for Analyzing Risk Coping Strategies.

Authors:  Yanwei Li; Araz Taeihagh; Martin de Jong; Andreas Klinke
Journal:  Risk Anal       Date:  2020-05-18       Impact factor: 4.000

2.  A Novel Causal Risk-Based Decision-Making Methodology: The Case of Coronavirus.

Authors:  Stavros K Stavroglou; Bilal M Ayyub; Vasileios Kallinterakis; Athanasios A Pantelous; H Eugene Stanley
Journal:  Risk Anal       Date:  2021-01-14       Impact factor: 4.302

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.