Literature DB >> 22403196

Impact of a Wellness Portal on the delivery of patient-centered preventive care.

Zsolt Nagykaldi1, Cheryl B Aspy, Ann Chou, James W Mold.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The objective of this study was to determine the impact of the Wellness Portal--a novel, web-based patient portal that focuses on wellness, prevention, and longitudinal health--on the delivery of patient-centered preventive care by examining the behavior and experiences of both patients and primary care clinicians and the degree to which recommended services were individualized and provided.
METHODS: We conducted a 3-year, systematic portal development and testing study, which included a 6-month feasibility and acceptability pilot in 2 primary care practices followed by a 12-month cluster randomized controlled trial in 8 clinician practices (4 in each study group). Descriptive and bivariate analyses were conducted to compare service delivery between intervention and control arms.
RESULTS: Ninety percent of patients in the pilot study found the portal easy to use, 83% found it to be a valuable resource, and 80% said that it facilitated their participation in their own care. The cluster randomized controlled trial included 422 adults 40 to 75 years of age and the parents of 116 children 2 to 5 years of age. Seventy three percent of patients used the portal during the study. Both patient activation (measured via the 13-item Patient Activation Measure) and participants' perception of patient-centeredness of care (measured via the Consumer Assessment of Healthcare Providers and Systems instrument) increased significantly in the portal group compared with control (P = .0014 and P = .037, respectively). A greater proportion of portal users received all recommended preventive services (84.4% intervention vs 67.6% control; P < .0001); took low-dose aspirin, if indicated (78.6% intervention vs 52.3% control; P < .0001); and received Pneumovax because of chronic health conditions (82.5% vs 53.9%; P < .0001) and age (86.3% vs 44.6%; P < .0001), despite having fewer visits over the study period compared with those in the control group (average of 2.9 vs 4.3 visits; P < .0001). Children in the intervention group received 95.5% of all recommended immunizations compared with 87.2% in the control group (P = .044).
CONCLUSIONS: A comprehensive patient portal integrated into the regular process of primary care can increase the patient-centeredness of care, improve patient activation, enhance the delivery of both age- and risk factor-appropriate preventive services, and promote the utilization of web-based personal health records.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22403196     DOI: 10.3122/jabfm.2012.02.110130

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Am Board Fam Med        ISSN: 1557-2625            Impact factor:   2.657


  40 in total

1.  Integrating the patient portal into the health management work ecosystem: user acceptance of a novel prototype.

Authors:  Jordan Eschler; Perry Lin Meas; Paula Lozano; Jennifer B McClure; James D Ralston; Wanda Pratt
Journal:  AMIA Annu Symp Proc       Date:  2017-02-10

2.  Documenting Routinely What Matters to People: Standardized Headings for Health Records of Patients with Chronic Health Conditions.

Authors:  Birgit Prodinger; Paul Rastall; Dipak Kalra; Darren Wooldridge; Iain Carpenter
Journal:  Appl Clin Inform       Date:  2018-05-23       Impact factor: 2.342

3.  Novel computerized health risk appraisal may improve longitudinal health and wellness in primary care: a pilot study.

Authors:  Z J Nagykaldi; V Voncken-Brewster; C B Aspy; J W Mold
Journal:  Appl Clin Inform       Date:  2013-02-20       Impact factor: 2.342

4.  Testing the Electronic Personal Health Record Acceptance Model by Nurses for Managing Their Own Health: A Cross-sectional Survey.

Authors:  K Gartrell; A M Trinkoff; C L Storr; M L Wilson; A P Gurses
Journal:  Appl Clin Inform       Date:  2015-04-08       Impact factor: 2.342

5.  A national survey of parent perspectives on use of patient portals for their children's health care.

Authors:  S J Clark; L E Costello; A Gebremariam; K J Dombkowski
Journal:  Appl Clin Inform       Date:  2015-02-25       Impact factor: 2.342

Review 6.  Academic general internal medicine: a mission for the future.

Authors:  Katrina Armstrong; Nancy L Keating; Michael Landry; Bradley H Crotty; Russell S Phillips; Harry P Selker
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2013-01-16       Impact factor: 5.128

7.  User-centered design and usability testing of an innovative health-related quality of life module.

Authors:  Z J Nagykaldi; M Jordan; J Quitoriano; C A Ciro; J W Mold
Journal:  Appl Clin Inform       Date:  2014-12-10       Impact factor: 2.342

Review 8.  Clinical Decision Support: a 25 Year Retrospective and a 25 Year Vision.

Authors:  B Middleton; D F Sittig; A Wright
Journal:  Yearb Med Inform       Date:  2016-08-02

9.  Usability of Web-based Personal Health Records: An Analysis of Consumers' Perspectives.

Authors:  Tiankai Wang; Diane Dolezel
Journal:  Perspect Health Inf Manag       Date:  2016-04-01

10.  Periodic preventive health visits: a more appropriate approach to delivering preventive services: From the Canadian Task Force on Preventive Health Care.

Authors:  Richard Birtwhistle; Neil R Bell; Brett D Thombs; Roland Grad; James A Dickinson
Journal:  Can Fam Physician       Date:  2017-11       Impact factor: 3.275

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.