Literature DB >> 22402752

Is access to the body structural description sensitive to a body part's significance for action and cognition? A study of the sidedness effect using feet.

Alessia Tessari1, Giovanni Ottoboni, Giulia Baroni, Ed Symes, Roberto Nicoletti.   

Abstract

There is evidence suggesting that viewing hands triggers automatic access to the Body Structural Description, a visual-spatial representation of human body parts configuration. Hands, however, have a special representational status within the brain because of their significance for action and cognition. We tested whether feet, less important in gestural and object-directed action, would similarly show automatic access to the Body Structural Description. Positive evidence of that would be finding a Sidedness effect (Ottoboni et al. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform 31:778-789, 2005), a Simon-like paradigm previously used to study automatic hand recognition. This effect demonstrates that processing hands generates spatial codes corresponding to the side of the body on which the hand would be located within the Body Structural Description map. Feet were shown with toes pointing upwards (Experiment 1), without any connection to the ankle and the leg (Experiment 2) and with toes pointing downwards (Experiment 3). Results revealed a Sidedness effect in both Experiments 1 and 3: spatial compatibility occurred according to the side of the body that each foot would assume within the Body Structural Description. In Experiment 2, as already found in stimuli similarly featured, no effect emerged, due to the lack of the necessary anatomical links connecting the foot to a body. Results suggest that body parts with variable degrees of significance for action and cognition can access automatically the Body Structural Description hence reinforcing the hypothesis of its pure visuo-spatial nature.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22402752     DOI: 10.1007/s00221-012-3045-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Exp Brain Res        ISSN: 0014-4819            Impact factor:   1.972


  38 in total

1.  Hand dominance influences the processing of observed bodies.

Authors:  Mark R Gardner; Rosalind Potts
Journal:  Brain Cogn       Date:  2010-03-24       Impact factor: 2.310

2.  Posture influences motor imagery: an fMRI study.

Authors:  Floris P de Lange; Rick C Helmich; Ivan Toni
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2006-09-07       Impact factor: 6.556

3.  The Simon effect and handedness: evidence for a dominant-hand attentional bias in spatial coding.

Authors:  Sandro Rubichi; Roberto Nicoletti
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  2006-10

Review 4.  The body in the brain revisited.

Authors:  Giovanni Berlucchi; Salvatore M Aglioti
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2009-08-19       Impact factor: 1.972

5.  Multiple nonprimary motor areas in the human cortex.

Authors:  G R Fink; R S Frackowiak; U Pietrzyk; R E Passingham
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  1997-04       Impact factor: 2.714

6.  Multiple representations contribute to body knowledge processing. Evidence from a case of autotopagnosia.

Authors:  A Sirigu; J Grafman; K Bressler; T Sunderland
Journal:  Brain       Date:  1991-02       Impact factor: 13.501

7.  Evidence for multiple, distinct representations of the human body.

Authors:  John Schwoebel; H Branch Coslett
Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2005-04       Impact factor: 3.225

8.  The effects of handedness and reachability on perceived distance.

Authors:  Sally A Linkenauger; Jessica K Witt; Jeanine K Stefanucci; Jonathan Z Bakdash; Dennis R Proffitt
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2009-12       Impact factor: 3.332

Review 9.  Body schema and body image--pros and cons.

Authors:  Frederique de Vignemont
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  2009-09-26       Impact factor: 3.139

10.  Mental rotation of body parts and non-corporeal objects in patients with idiopathic cervical dystonia.

Authors:  Mirta Fiorio; Michele Tinazzi; Silvio Ionta; Antonio Fiaschi; Giuseppe Moretto; Mark J Edwards; Kailash P Bhatia; Salvatore M Aglioti
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  2007-02-20       Impact factor: 3.139

View more
  6 in total

1.  Finger posture modulates structural body representations.

Authors:  Luigi Tamè; Elanah Dransfield; Thomas Quettier; Matthew R Longo
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-02-22       Impact factor: 4.379

2.  Action and Non-Action Oriented Body Representations: Insight from Behavioural and Grey Matter Modifications in Individuals with Lower Limb Amputation.

Authors:  Liana Palermo; Antonella Di Vita; Maddalena Boccia; Federico Nemmi; Stefano Brunelli; Marco Traballesi; Roberto De Giorgi; Gaspare Galati; Cecilia Guariglia
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2018-10-18       Impact factor: 3.411

3.  Does the body talk to the body? The relationship between different body representations while observing others' body parts.

Authors:  Alessia Tessari; Giovanni Ottoboni
Journal:  Br J Psychol       Date:  2022-02-18

4.  The Effect of Sport Practice on Enhanced Cognitive Processing of Bodily Indices: A Study on Volleyball Players and Their Ability to Predict Hand Gestures.

Authors:  Giovanni Ottoboni; Roberto Nicoletti; Alessia Tessari
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2021-05-18       Impact factor: 3.390

5.  Please don't! The automatic extrapolation of dangerous intentions.

Authors:  Alessia Tessari; Giovanni Ottoboni; Andrea Mazzatenta; Arcangelo Merla; Roberto Nicoletti
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-11-14       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 6.  Tool-use: An open window into body representation and its plasticity.

Authors:  Marie Martel; Lucilla Cardinali; Alice C Roy; Alessandro Farnè
Journal:  Cogn Neuropsychol       Date:  2016-06-17       Impact factor: 2.468

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.