Literature DB >> 22402171

Nursing homes appeals of deficiencies: the informal dispute resolution process.

Dana B Mukamel1, David L Weimer, Yue Li, Lauren Bailey, William D Spector, Charlene Harrington.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Nursing homes that are not meeting quality standards are cited for deficiencies. Before 1995, the only recourse for a nursing home was a formal appeal process, which is lengthy and costly. In 1995, the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services instituted the Informal Dispute Resolution (IDR) process. This study presents for the first time national statistics about the IDR process and an analysis of the factors that influence nursing homes' decisions to request an IDR.
DESIGN: Retrospective study including descriptive statistics and multivariate logistic hierarchical models.
SETTING: US nursing homes from 2005 to 2008. PARTICIPANTS: Participants were 15,916 Medicaid- and Medicare-certified nursing homes nationally, with 94,188 surveys and 9388 IDRs. MEASURES: The unit of observation was an annual survey or a complaint survey that generated at least one deficiency. The dependent variable was dichotomous and indicated whether the annual or a complaint survey triggered an IDR request. Independent variables included characteristics of the nursing home, the deficiency, the market, and the state regulatory environment.
RESULTS: Ten percent of all annual surveys and complaint surveys resulted in IDRs. There was substantial variation across states, which persisted over time. Multivariate results suggest that nursing homes' decisions to request an IDR depend on their assessment of the probability of success and assessment of the benefits of the submission.
CONCLUSIONS: Nursing homes avail themselves of the IDR process. Their propensity to do so depends on a number of factors, including the state regulatory system and the market environment in which they operate.
Copyright © 2012 American Medical Directors Association. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22402171      PMCID: PMC3389192          DOI: 10.1016/j.jamda.2012.01.005

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Am Med Dir Assoc        ISSN: 1525-8610            Impact factor:   4.669


  6 in total

1.  Use of resident-origin data to define nursing home market boundaries.

Authors:  Jack Zwanziger; Dana B Mukamel; Indridi Indridason
Journal:  Inquiry       Date:  2002       Impact factor: 1.730

2.  The quest for nursing home quality: learning history's lessons.

Authors:  Gary S Winzelberg
Journal:  Arch Intern Med       Date:  2003-11-24

3.  State nursing home enforcement systems.

Authors:  Charlene Harrington; Joseph T Mullan; Helen Carrillo
Journal:  J Health Polit Policy Law       Date:  2004-02       Impact factor: 2.265

4.  Changes in clinical and hotel expenditures following publication of the nursing home compare report card.

Authors:  Dana B Mukamel; William D Spector; Jacqueline Zinn; David L Weimer; Richard Ahn
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  2010-10       Impact factor: 2.983

5.  Does state regulation of quality impose costs on nursing homes?

Authors:  Dana B Mukamel; Yue Li; Charlene Harrington; William D Spector; David L Weimer; Lauren Bailey
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  2011-06       Impact factor: 2.983

6.  State regulatory enforcement and nursing home termination from the medicare and medicaid programs.

Authors:  Yue Li; Charlene Harrington; William D Spector; Dana B Mukamel
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  2010-09-01       Impact factor: 3.402

  6 in total
  1 in total

1.  What factors contribute to successful appeals of nursing homes' deficiencies in the informal dispute resolution process?

Authors:  Dana B Mukamel; Yue Li; David L Weimer; William D Spector; Lauren Bailey; Charlene Harrington
Journal:  J Am Med Dir Assoc       Date:  2012-11-07       Impact factor: 4.669

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.