PURPOSE: This study examines the management and outcomes of muscle-invasive bladder cancer in the United States. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Patients with muscle-invasive bladder cancer diagnosed between 1988 and 2006 were identified in the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database. Patients were classified according to three mutually exclusive treatment categories based on the primary initial treatment: no local management, radiotherapy, or surgery. Overall survival was assessed with Kaplan-Meier analysis and Cox models based on multiple factors including treatment utilization patterns. RESULTS: The study population consisted of 26,851 patients. Age, sex, race, tumor grade, histology, and geographic location were associated with differences in treatment (all p < 0.01). Patients receiving definitive radiotherapy tended to be older and have less differentiated tumors than patients undergoing surgery (RT, median age 78 years old and 90.6% grade 3/4 tumors; surgery, median age 71 years old and 77.1% grade 3/4 tumors). No large shifts in treatment were seen over time, with most patients managed with surgical resection (86.3% for overall study population). Significant survival differences were observed according to initial treatment: median survival, 14 months with no definitive local treatment; 17 months with radiotherapy; and 43 months for surgery. On multivariate analysis, differences in local utilization rates of definitive radiotherapy did not demonstrate a significant effect on overall survival (hazard ratio, 1.002; 95% confidence interval, 0.999-1.005). CONCLUSIONS: Multiple factors influence the initial treatment strategy for muscle-invasive bladder cancer, but definitive radiotherapy continues to be used infrequently. Although patients who undergo surgery fare better, a multivariable model that accounted for patient and tumor characteristics found no survival detriment to the utilization of definitive radiotherapy. These results support continued research into bladder preservation strategies and suggest that definitive radiotherapy represents a viable initial treatment strategy for those who wish to attempt to preserve their native bladder.
PURPOSE: This study examines the management and outcomes of muscle-invasive bladder cancer in the United States. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Patients with muscle-invasive bladder cancer diagnosed between 1988 and 2006 were identified in the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database. Patients were classified according to three mutually exclusive treatment categories based on the primary initial treatment: no local management, radiotherapy, or surgery. Overall survival was assessed with Kaplan-Meier analysis and Cox models based on multiple factors including treatment utilization patterns. RESULTS: The study population consisted of 26,851 patients. Age, sex, race, tumor grade, histology, and geographic location were associated with differences in treatment (all p < 0.01). Patients receiving definitive radiotherapy tended to be older and have less differentiated tumors than patients undergoing surgery (RT, median age 78 years old and 90.6% grade 3/4 tumors; surgery, median age 71 years old and 77.1% grade 3/4 tumors). No large shifts in treatment were seen over time, with most patients managed with surgical resection (86.3% for overall study population). Significant survival differences were observed according to initial treatment: median survival, 14 months with no definitive local treatment; 17 months with radiotherapy; and 43 months for surgery. On multivariate analysis, differences in local utilization rates of definitive radiotherapy did not demonstrate a significant effect on overall survival (hazard ratio, 1.002; 95% confidence interval, 0.999-1.005). CONCLUSIONS: Multiple factors influence the initial treatment strategy for muscle-invasive bladder cancer, but definitive radiotherapy continues to be used infrequently. Although patients who undergo surgery fare better, a multivariable model that accounted for patient and tumor characteristics found no survival detriment to the utilization of definitive radiotherapy. These results support continued research into bladder preservation strategies and suggest that definitive radiotherapy represents a viable initial treatment strategy for those who wish to attempt to preserve their native bladder.
Authors: J P Stein; G Lieskovsky; R Cote; S Groshen; A C Feng; S Boyd; E Skinner; B Bochner; D Thangathurai; M Mikhail; D Raghavan; D G Skinner Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2001-02-01 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: William U Shipley; Donald S Kaufman; William J Tester; Miljenko V Pilepich; Howard M Sandler Journal: Cancer Date: 2003-04-15 Impact factor: 6.860
Authors: M K Gospodarowicz; N V Hawkins; G A Rawlings; J G Connolly; M A Jewett; G M Thomas; J G Herman; P G Garrett; T Chua; W Duncan Journal: J Urol Date: 1989-12 Impact factor: 7.450
Authors: H Barton Grossman; Ronald B Natale; Catherine M Tangen; V O Speights; Nicholas J Vogelzang; Donald L Trump; Ralph W deVere White; Michael F Sarosdy; David P Wood; Derek Raghavan; E David Crawford Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2003-08-28 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Claus Rödel; Gerhard G Grabenbauer; Reinhard Kühn; Thomas Papadopoulos; Jürgen Dunst; Martin Meyer; Karl M Schrott; Rolf Sauer Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2002-07-15 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Anthony L Zietman; Dianne Sacco; Uri Skowronski; Pablo Gomery; Donald S Kaufman; Jack A Clark; James A Talcott; William U Shipley Journal: J Urol Date: 2003-11 Impact factor: 7.450
Authors: Robert A Huddart; Alison Birtle; Lauren Maynard; Mark Beresford; Jane Blazeby; Jenny Donovan; John D Kelly; Tony Kirkbank; Duncan B McLaren; Graham Mead; Clare Moynihan; Raj Persad; Christopher Scrase; Rebecca Lewis; Emma Hall Journal: BJU Int Date: 2017-05-29 Impact factor: 5.588
Authors: Hyun Hwan Sung; Hana Kim; Ryul Kim; Chan Kyo Kim; Ghee Young Kwon; Won Park; Wan Song; Byong Chang Jeong; Se Hoon Park Journal: Investig Clin Urol Date: 2022-03
Authors: Mohd Nasrullah Nik Ab Kadir; Suhaily Mohd Hairon; Najib Majdi Yaacob; Azizah Ab Manan; Nabihah Ali Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2021-05-14 Impact factor: 3.390
Authors: Mohd Nasrullah Nik Ab Kadir; Suhaily Mohd Hairon; Najib Majdi Yaacob; Azizah Ab Manan; Nabihah Ali Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2022-03-04 Impact factor: 3.390