Literature DB >> 22401644

Medical end-of-life decisions: does its use differ in vulnerable patient groups? A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Judith A C Rietjens1, Reginald Deschepper, Roeline Pasman, Luc Deliens.   

Abstract

Medical end-of-life decisions, defined as end-of-life practices with a potential or certain life-shortening effect, precede almost 50% of deaths in Western countries, and receive ample medical-ethical attention. This systematic review aims to detect whether there are differences in the prevalence of medical end-of-life decisions in 'vulnerable' patient groups. In 2009, five major databases were scrutinized for publications containing original data on the prevalence of euthanasia/physician-assisted suicide, life-ending without explicit patient request, intensified symptom alleviation, non-treatment decisions and palliative sedation by social factors (eg age, gender and SES). Heterogeneous findings were pooled using a random effects model. We identified 6377 papers of which 51 papers were selected, involving over 1.09 million patients. Most publications reported the prevalence of non-treatment decisions. The most studied social factors were age and gender. Among patients older than eighty years, non-treatment decisions occurred more frequently compared with younger patients, while intensified symptom alleviation, palliative sedation, euthanasia/physician-assisted suicide and life-ending without explicit request were practiced less often. Similar patterns of association, although less strong, were found for female patients compared with males and those with lower levels of education versus more highly-educated patients. We conclude that the administration of medication with a potential or certain life-shortening effect seemed generally to be practiced less often among the elderly, females and less well-educated patients compared with younger, male or more educated patients, while decisions that include the withdrawal or withholding of treatments seem to be more common in these groups. Further studies should focus on investigating whether these differences reflect less than optimal end-of-life care for specific patient groups.
Copyright © 2012 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22401644     DOI: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2011.12.046

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Soc Sci Med        ISSN: 0277-9536            Impact factor:   4.634


  19 in total

1.  Addressing the Concerns Surrounding Continuous Deep Sedation in Singapore and Southeast Asia: A Palliative Care Approach.

Authors:  Lalit Kumar Radha Krishna
Journal:  J Bioeth Inq       Date:  2015-07-15       Impact factor: 1.352

2.  "Rather one more chemo than one less…": Oncologists and Oncology Nurses' Reasons for Aggressive Treatment of Young Adults with Advanced Cancer.

Authors:  Katsiaryna Laryionava; Pia Heußner; Wolfgang Hiddemann; Eva C Winkler
Journal:  Oncologist       Date:  2017-11-13

3.  Low socioeconomic status is associated with more aggressive end-of-life care for working-age terminal cancer patients.

Authors:  Chun-Ming Chang; Chin-Chia Wu; Wen-Yao Yin; Shiun-Yang Juang; Chia-Hui Yu; Ching-Chih Lee
Journal:  Oncologist       Date:  2014-10-23

4.  End-of-Life Decision Making in Palliative Care and Recommendations of the Council of Europe: Qualitative Secondary Analysis of Interviews and Observation Field Notes.

Authors:  Sandra Martins Pereira; Emília Fradique; Pablo Hernández-Marrero
Journal:  J Palliat Med       Date:  2018-01-03       Impact factor: 2.947

5.  Factors related to specialized palliative care use and aggressive care at end of life in Japanese patients with advanced solid cancers: a cohort study.

Authors:  Yusuke Hiratsuka; Takayuki Oishi; Mitsunori Miyashita; Tatsuya Morita; Jennifer W Mack; Yuko Sato; Masahiro Takahashi; Keigo Komine; Ken Saijo; Chikashi Ishioka; Akira Inoue
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2021-06-25       Impact factor: 3.603

6.  Continuing, Withdrawing, and Withholding Medical Treatment at the End of Life and Associated Characteristics: a Mortality Follow-back Study.

Authors:  Yolanda W H Penders; Matthias Bopp; Ueli Zellweger; Georg Bosshard
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2019-10-25       Impact factor: 5.128

7.  Determinants of End-of-Life Expenditures in Patients with Oral Cancer in Taiwan: A Population-Based Study.

Authors:  Ching-Chih Lee; Ting-Shou Chang; Cheng-Jung Wu; Ching-Chieh Yang; Po-Chun Chen
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-05-06       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Is educational attainment related to end-of-life decision-making? A large post-mortem survey in Belgium.

Authors:  Kenneth Chambaere; Judith A C Rietjens; Joachim Cohen; Koen Pardon; Reginald Deschepper; H Roeline W Pasman; Luc Deliens
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2013-11-09       Impact factor: 3.295

Review 9.  Conceptualizing and Counting Discretionary Utilization in the Final 100 Days of Life: A Scoping Review.

Authors:  Paul R Duberstein; Michael Chen; Michael Hoerger; Ronald M Epstein; Laura M Perry; Sule Yilmaz; Fahad Saeed; Supriya G Mohile; Sally A Norton
Journal:  J Pain Symptom Manage       Date:  2019-10-19       Impact factor: 3.612

10.  Medicalisation, suffering and control at the end of life: The interplay of deep continuous palliative sedation and assisted dying.

Authors:  Gitte Hanssen Koksvik; Naomi Richards; Sheri Mila Gerson; Lars Johan Materstvedt; David Clark
Journal:  Health (London)       Date:  2020-12-11
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.