Literature DB >> 22401489

Sponsorship, antidepressant dose, and outcome in major depressive disorder: meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

Mark Sinyor1, Ayal Schaffer, Kelly A Smart, Anthony J Levitt, Krista L Lanctôt, Noam H Grysman.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Differences in dosing may influence results of pharmaceutical industry-sponsored medication trials. This study aims to determine the relationship between sponsorship and antidepressant dosing and efficacy in randomized controlled trials for major depressive disorder. DATA SOURCES: Trials were identified through English-language searches of MEDLINE and PsycINFO (January 1996-June 2010) using specific drug names and classes and depressive disorder or major depression and double blind or double-blind method. Other limitations included human subjects and treatment study designs using the clinical queries option. Other sources were also searched following a strict set of inclusion and exclusion criteria. STUDY SELECTION: Randomized controlled trials were included if they examined antidepressant treatment for major depressive disorder, reported mean final medication dosages, acknowledged an association with industry, and included study arms of medications produced by the associated manufacturer and a competitor ("sponsor" and "nonsponsor" arms) (58 trials involving 15,026 patients from 101 citations identified). DATA EXTRACTION: Data on dosing, efficacy, baseline severity, and adverse events were extracted by 2 of the authors.
RESULTS: Meta-analyses were used to examine dosing and efficacy data. Using consensus guidelines for medication dosing, we determined that sponsor medication was dosed relatively higher than nonsponsor medication, in 37% (22/60) of comparisons as opposed to 5% (3/60) in which the nonsponsor medication was dosed higher (χ²₂ = 25.9, P < .001). Trials in which sponsor drugs were dosed higher than nonsponsor drugs demonstrated higher remission rates for the sponsor drug (OR = 1.28, 95% CI = 1.11-1.47, P < .001). These results were confirmed using regulatory dosing guidelines. There was no significant correlation between dosing or outcome with baseline severity or adverse events.
CONCLUSIONS: Sponsor drugs are dosed higher than nonsponsor drugs in antidepressant randomized controlled trials, and higher dosing is associated with better sponsor drug outcomes in some cases. © Copyright 2012 Physicians Postgraduate Press, Inc.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22401489     DOI: 10.4088/JCP.11r07204

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Psychiatry        ISSN: 0160-6689            Impact factor:   4.384


  4 in total

1.  Industry sponsorship and research outcome: systematic review with meta-analysis.

Authors:  Andreas Lundh; Joel Lexchin; Barbara Mintzes; Jeppe B Schroll; Lisa Bero
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2018-08-21       Impact factor: 17.440

Review 2.  Treatment resistant depression: strategies for primary care.

Authors:  Taylor C Preston; Richard C Shelton
Journal:  Curr Psychiatry Rep       Date:  2013-07       Impact factor: 5.285

3.  Disclosures of conflicts of interest in psychiatric review articles.

Authors:  Andrew M Kopelman; David A Gorelick; Paul S Appelbaum
Journal:  J Nerv Ment Dis       Date:  2013-02       Impact factor: 2.254

Review 4.  Industry sponsorship and research outcome.

Authors:  Andreas Lundh; Joel Lexchin; Barbara Mintzes; Jeppe B Schroll; Lisa Bero
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2017-02-16
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.