Literature DB >> 22399774

Identification of modulators of hair cell regeneration in the zebrafish lateral line.

Parhum Namdaran1, Katherine E Reinhart, Kelly N Owens, David W Raible, Edwin W Rubel.   

Abstract

The external location of the zebrafish lateral line makes it a powerful model for studying mechanosensory hair cell regeneration. We have developed a chemical screen to identify FDA-approved drugs and biologically active compounds that modulate hair cell regeneration in zebrafish. Of the 1680 compounds evaluated, we identified two enhancers and six inhibitors of regeneration. The two enhancers, dexamethasone and prednisolone, are synthetic glucocorticoids that potentiated hair cell numbers during regeneration and also induced hair cell addition in the absence of damage. BrdU analysis confirmed that the extra hair cells arose from mitotic activity. We found that dexamethasone and prednisolone, like other glucocorticoids, suppress zebrafish caudal fin regeneration, indicating that hair cell regeneration occurs by a distinctly different process. Further analyses of the regeneration inhibitors revealed that two of the six, flubendazole and topotecan, significantly suppress hair cell regeneration by preventing proliferation of hair cell precursors. Flubendazole halted support cell division in M-phase, possibly by interfering with normal microtubule activity. Topotecan, a topoisomerase inhibitor, killed both hair cells and proliferating hair cell precursors. A third inhibitor, fulvestrant, moderately delayed hair cell regeneration by reducing support cell proliferation. Our observation that hair cells do not regenerate when support cell proliferation is impeded confirms previous observations that cell division is the primary route for hair cell regeneration after neomycin treatment in zebrafish.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22399774      PMCID: PMC3318954          DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.3905-11.2012

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurosci        ISSN: 0270-6474            Impact factor:   6.167


  80 in total

1.  Mitotic and nonmitotic hair cell regeneration in the bullfrog vestibular otolith organs.

Authors:  R A Baird; P S Steyger; N R Schuff
Journal:  Ann N Y Acad Sci       Date:  1996-06-19       Impact factor: 5.691

2.  The avian inner ear. Continuous production of hair cells in vestibular sensory organs, but not in the auditory papilla.

Authors:  J M Jørgensen; C Mathiesen
Journal:  Naturwissenschaften       Date:  1988-06

3.  Regeneration of sensory cells after laser ablation in the lateral line system: hair cell lineage and macrophage behavior revealed by time-lapse video microscopy.

Authors:  J E Jones; J T Corwin
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  1996-01-15       Impact factor: 6.167

4.  Cell division in the gerbil cochlea after acoustic trauma.

Authors:  D W Roberson; E W Rubel
Journal:  Am J Otol       Date:  1994-01

5.  New hair cells arise from supporting cell conversion in the acoustically damaged chick inner ear.

Authors:  H J Adler; Y Raphael
Journal:  Neurosci Lett       Date:  1996-02-16       Impact factor: 3.046

6.  Regeneration of hair cell stereociliary bundles in the chick cochlea following severe acoustic trauma.

Authors:  D A Cotanche
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  1987       Impact factor: 3.208

7.  A potent specific pure antiestrogen with clinical potential.

Authors:  A E Wakeling; M Dukes; J Bowler
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  1991-08-01       Impact factor: 12.701

8.  Effects of corticosteroids on lymphocyte subpopulations and lymphokine secretion in chickens.

Authors:  T Isobe; H S Lillehoj
Journal:  Avian Dis       Date:  1992 Jul-Sep       Impact factor: 1.577

9.  Regeneration of sensory hair cells after acoustic trauma.

Authors:  J T Corwin; D A Cotanche
Journal:  Science       Date:  1988-06-24       Impact factor: 47.728

10.  Hair cell regeneration after acoustic trauma in adult Coturnix quail.

Authors:  B M Ryals; E W Rubel
Journal:  Science       Date:  1988-06-24       Impact factor: 47.728

View more
  41 in total

Review 1.  Let's get small (and smaller): Combining zebrafish and nanomedicine to advance neuroregenerative therapeutics.

Authors:  David T White; Meera T Saxena; Jeff S Mumm
Journal:  Adv Drug Deliv Rev       Date:  2019-02-12       Impact factor: 15.470

Review 2.  Developing zebrafish disease models for in vivo small molecule screens.

Authors:  Pui-Ying Lam; Randall T Peterson
Journal:  Curr Opin Chem Biol       Date:  2019-03-28       Impact factor: 8.822

3.  An FDA-Approved Drug Screen for Compounds Influencing Craniofacial Skeletal Development and Craniosynostosis.

Authors:  Marian Seda; Maartje Geerlings; Peggy Lim; Jeshmi Jeyabalan-Srikaran; Ann-Christin Cichon; Peter J Scambler; Philip L Beales; Victor Hernandez-Hernandez; Andrew W Stoker; Dagan Jenkins
Journal:  Mol Syndromol       Date:  2018-07-21

4.  Hearing sensitivity differs between zebrafish lines used in auditory research.

Authors:  J David Monroe; Dustin P Manning; Phillip M Uribe; Ashwin Bhandiwad; Joseph A Sisneros; Michael E Smith; Allison B Coffin
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2016-09-16       Impact factor: 3.208

5.  Natural Compounds as Occult Ototoxins? Ginkgo biloba Flavonoids Moderately Damage Lateral Line Hair Cells.

Authors:  Sarah Neveux; Nicole K Smith; Anna Roche; Bruce E Blough; Wimal Pathmasiri; Allison B Coffin
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2016-11-28

Review 6.  Effect of intratympanic dimethyl sulphoxide (DMSO) in an in vivo model of cisplatin-related ototoxicity.

Authors:  A Roldán-Fidalgo; A Trinidad; A Rodríguez-Valiente; J R García-Berrocal; I Millán; M J Coronado; R Ramírez-Camacho
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2014-03-08       Impact factor: 2.503

7.  Live cell-lineage tracing and machine learning reveal patterns of organ regeneration.

Authors:  Oriol Viader-Llargués; Valerio Lupperger; Laura Pola-Morell; Carsten Marr; Hernán López-Schier
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2018-03-29       Impact factor: 8.140

8.  Quantification of Estradiol Uptake in Zebrafish Embryos and Larvae.

Authors:  Jaclyn Paige Souder; Daniel A Gorelick
Journal:  Toxicol Sci       Date:  2017-08-01       Impact factor: 4.849

Review 9.  Advances in zebrafish chemical screening technologies.

Authors:  Jonathan R Mathias; Meera T Saxena; Jeff S Mumm
Journal:  Future Med Chem       Date:  2012-09       Impact factor: 3.808

10.  Auditory sensitivity of larval zebrafish (Danio rerio) measured using a behavioral prepulse inhibition assay.

Authors:  Ashwin A Bhandiwad; David G Zeddies; David W Raible; Edwin W Rubel; Joseph A Sisneros
Journal:  J Exp Biol       Date:  2013-09-15       Impact factor: 3.312

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.