Literature DB >> 22399053

Is sexual concordance related to awareness of physiological states?

Kelly D Suschinsky1, Martin L Lalumière.   

Abstract

Sexual concordance refers to the degree to which two aspects of human sexual arousal (genital response and self-reported sexual arousal) correspond with each other. Researchers have consistently reported a sex difference in sexual concordance: The relationship between genital responses and reported feelings of sexual arousal in men is positive and large, whereas the relationship in women is positive but much smaller than that seen in men. The study of interoception--people's awareness of their physiological states--reveals a similar sex difference: Men are more aware of a variety of (non-genital) responses (e.g., heart rate) than women in the laboratory. The purpose of the current study was to investigate whether the sex difference in sexual concordance was related to a broader sex difference in interoception. Twenty men and 20 women were presented with twelve 90 s sexual and non-sexual film clips while their genital responses, heart rate, and respiration rate were measured. Participants also estimated their physiological responses. As expected, men were significantly more sexually concordant than women. Men were also significantly more aware of their heart rate, but there was no significant sex difference in respiration rate awareness. Sexual concordance was not significantly correlated with either heart rate or respiration rate awareness. The results suggest that the sex difference in sexual concordance may be a unique phenomenon, separate from general awareness of physiological states.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22399053     DOI: 10.1007/s10508-012-9931-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arch Sex Behav        ISSN: 0004-0002


  7 in total

Review 1.  Interoceptive dysfunction: toward an integrated framework for understanding somatic and affective disturbance in depression.

Authors:  Christopher Harshaw
Journal:  Psychol Bull       Date:  2014-11-03       Impact factor: 17.737

Review 2.  The Empirical Status of the Preparation Hypothesis: Explicating Women's Genital Responses to Sexual Stimuli in the Laboratory.

Authors:  Martin L Lalumière; Megan L Sawatsky; Samantha J Dawson; Kelly D Suschinsky
Journal:  Arch Sex Behav       Date:  2020-02-05

3.  Sex differences in the neural processing of aversive interoceptive events: the benefit of relief.

Authors:  Giulia Galli; Akanksha Shukla; Alan N Simmons; Paul W Davenport; Martin P Paulus
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-12-30       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  Pupillary Response as an Age-Specific Measure of Sexual Interest.

Authors:  Janice Attard-Johnson; Markus Bindemann; Caoilte Ó Ciardha
Journal:  Arch Sex Behav       Date:  2016-02-08

5.  Listen to Your Heart-Ecological Momentary Assessment of Interoceptive Accuracy, Awareness and Sensibility: A Pilot Study.

Authors:  Inken Höller; Jana-Sophie Stenzel; Dajana Rath; Thomas Forkmann
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2021-05-04       Impact factor: 3.390

6.  Interoception and sexual response in women with low sexual desire.

Authors:  Julia Velten; Lori A Brotto
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-10-11       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  At the Heart of Neurological Dimensionality: Cross-Nosological and Multimodal Cardiac Interoceptive Deficits.

Authors:  Sofía Abrevaya; Sol Fittipaldi; Adolfo M García; Martin Dottori; Hernando Santamaria-Garcia; Agustina Birba; Adrián Yoris; Malin Katharina Hildebrandt; Paula Salamone; Alethia De la Fuente; Sofía Alarco-Martí; Indira García-Cordero; Miguel Matorrel-Caro; Ricardo Marcos Pautassi; Cecilia Serrano; Lucas Sedeño; Agustín Ibáñez
Journal:  Psychosom Med       Date:  2020 Nov/Dec       Impact factor: 4.312

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.