| Literature DB >> 22398631 |
Nadine Rujeni1, Norman Nausch, Claire D Bourke, Nicholas Midzi, Takafira Mduluza, David W Taylor, Francisca Mutapi.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The hygiene hypothesis suggests that parasitic infections protect against allergic diseases by modulating the host's immune responses. Experimental studies indicate that this protection depends on the intensity of parasitic infection, but this observation has not been tested in human populations. The aim of this study is to investigate whether the intensity of Schistosoma haematobium infection is related to atopic responses and whether this relationship differs between populations with distinct parasite transmission dynamics.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2012 PMID: 22398631 PMCID: PMC3398828 DOI: 10.1159/000332949
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Int Arch Allergy Immunol ISSN: 1018-2438 Impact factor: 2.749
Study population description. a Demography and socioeconomic status in the study areas. b S. haematobium infection levels by age in the selected populations
| Magaya (HTA) | Chitate (LTA) | |
|---|---|---|
| Number of participants (baseline) | 442 | 344 |
| Mean age, years (range) | 11.4 (3-86) | 18.5 (1.5-86) |
| Sex ratio (M/F) | 0.825 (199/241) | 0.57 (127/221) |
| Ethnic group | Shona | Shona |
| Socioeconomic status | rural subsistence farmers | rural subsistence farmers |
| 52.94% (95% CI 48-57.67) | 8.6% (95% CI 5.9-12.1) | |
| 44.79 (0-859), SEM = 5.654 | 0.958 (0-70.3), SEM = 0.2723 | |
| 6 cases (7-13 years old) | 1 case (69 years old) | |
| Malaria prevalence | 0% | 0% |
| STH prevalence | 0% | 0% |
| No urine sample provided (excluded) | 16 cases (3-26 years old) | 2 cases (unknown age) |
| No blood sample provided and/or no age record (excluded) | 55 | 34 |
| Total number of participants included | 365 | 307 |
| SPT sampled | 26 (3-65 years old, mean infection = 2.69 eggs/10 ml, range 0-22 eggs/10 ml) | 306 (1.5-86 years old, mean infection = 0.758 eggs/10 ml, range 0-30 eggs/10 ml) |
Baseline variables (a) and infection levels by age groups in the selected populations (b) are shown for the 2 villages. Statistical results of χ2 analysis and ANOVA on the prevalence and infection intensity, respectively, are presented for each age group and significant p values are highlighted in bold.
CI = Confidence interval; HTA = high-transmission area; LTA = low-transmission area; SEM = standard error of the mean; STH = soil-transmitted helminths.
Fig. 1Prevalence and infection intensity according to age in the study area. Infection intensity (a) and prevalence (b) are plotted against age groups in the high-transmission (– – –) and the low-transmission area (––––). Bars represent standard error of the means for infection intensity and 95% CI for the prevalence. * p < 0.05 and ** p < 0.01 represent significant differences in each group between the two villages.
Results from a multivariate analysis of the effects of age, sex, village and infection intensity on antibody levels and ratio
| Dependent variable | Sex | Age | Village (comparison) | Infection intensity F and (ß) values | Age and village interaction | Infection and village interaction |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Antischistosome responses | ||||||
| SWAP-IgE | ||||||
| SWAP-IgG4 | 0.139 | |||||
| SWAP-IgE/IgG4 | 2.450 (F<M) | 1.895 | 1.014 (L<H) | 2.558* | 0.001 | |
| 1.889 | ||||||
| SEA-IgE/IgG4 | 0.026 (M<F) | 2.303 | 1.27 | 0.096 | ||
| Antiallergen responses | ||||||
| Der p 1-IgE | 3.81** | 0.354 | ||||
| Der p 1-IgG4 | 0.527 (−0.024) | 1.195 | 0.025 | |||
| Der p 1-IgE/IgG4 | 0.806 | 4.405 (−0.072)* | 1.856 | 0.853 | ||
F values from a multivariate analysis determining the effects of different variables on the levels of parasite and allergen-specific antibody responses. The effects of infection intensity were determined after allowing for the effects of a host's age, sex and village of residence by sequential sums of squares. The β-coefficients from a linear regression are also shown for the direction of the relationship ‘infection-antibody’. Degrees of freedom: 1 for sex, village and infection; 4 for age; the total for the error was 660. F values with significant p values (i.e. * p > 0.05 and ** p > 0.01) are highlighted in bold.
F = Female; H = high-transmission village; L = low-transmission village; M = male; SEA= soluble egg antigen; SWAP = soluble worm antigen preparation.
Fig. 2Antibody levels according to age. Der p 1-specific, SWAP-specific and SEA-specific responses in the high-transmission (– – –) and the low-transmission area (––––). Bars represent standard error of the means. * p < 0.05 and ** p < 0.01 represent significant differences in each group between the two villages.
Fig. 3Der p 1-specific antibody levels in SPT-positive versus SPT-negative individuals. Levels (absorbencies) of anti-Der p 1 IgE and IgG4 are plotted for SPT-negative and SPT-positive people. Bars represent standard error of the means. n.s. = Difference not significant, versus ** p < 0.01 = a significant difference.
Fig. 4Correlation between SPT results and infection intensity. Residuals of infection intensity after controlling for age, sex and village of residence are plotted against the size of the wheal in millimeters.
Fig. 5Correlations between schistosome-specific:mite-specific antibody ratio and infection intensity. Residuals (after controlling for age and sex) of IgE, IgG4 and IgE/IgG4 against Der p 1 (a), SWAPs (b) and SEAs (c) are plotted against infection intensity (log-transformed) for Magaya (high-transmission area) and Chitate (low-transmission area). One-tailed Pearson correlations were performed. Correlations significant at p < 0.05 are highlighted in bold. Resid = Residual.