Literature DB >> 2239841

Influence of vertical growth pattern on faciolingual inclinations and treatment mechanics.

V A Ross1, R J Isaacson, N Germane, L K Rubenstein.   

Abstract

Control of faciolingual tooth inclinations is obtained by using rectangular wire with third-order bends and standard edgewise brackets or by using a straight wire in a preadjusted appliance system. Ideal faciolingual inclinations have been determined previously by measuring facial surface contours relative to coronal long axes. This study evaluates faciolingual inclinations based on occlusal table inclinations relative to occlusal planes. The samples compared include untreated ideal occlusions and malocclusions in three different vertical skeletal growth patterns. Faciolingual inclinations of first molars and central incisors were measured relative to the occlusal plane and to selected cephalometric angular measurements. Statistical comparisons between groups revealed significant differences in the inclinations of the upper incisor relative to the occlusal plane (U1-OP) and the inclination of the occlusal plane relative to sella nasion (OP-SN). No statistically significant intergroup differences were found in the inclination of the lower incisor relative to the occlusal plane (L1-OP) or in the faciolingual inclinations of the maxillary and mandibular first molars. On the basis of the large intergroup differences in the mean angle between the occlusal plane and sella nasion (OP-SN), the use of straight-wire appliance therapy is discussed in terms of the potential for creating differential moments. Because differential moments may facilitate or hinder treatment goals, the practitioner must know the biomechanical sequelae resulting from occlusal plane-sella nasion variations, which differ from normative values when preadjusted brackets are used.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1990        PMID: 2239841     DOI: 10.1016/S0889-5406(05)81651-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop        ISSN: 0889-5406            Impact factor:   2.650


  11 in total

1.  Myths and realities in orthodontics.

Authors:  P S Fleming; S D Springate; R A C Chate
Journal:  Br Dent J       Date:  2015-02-16       Impact factor: 1.626

2.  Buccolingual inclination of molars in untreated children and adults: A cone beam computed tomography study.

Authors:  Brianna Yang; Chun-Hsi Chung
Journal:  Angle Orthod       Date:  2018-08-03       Impact factor: 2.079

3.  Buccolingual Inclination of Canine and First and Second Molar Teeth and the Curve of Wilson in Different Sagittal Skeletal Patterns of Adults Using Cone-Beam Computed Tomography.

Authors:  Amin Golshah; Navid Rezaei; Sara Heshmati
Journal:  Int J Dent       Date:  2020-10-31

4.  Wilson maxillary curve analyzed by CBCT. A study on normocclusion and malocclusion individuals.

Authors:  José-María Barrera; José-María Llamas; Eduardo Espinar; Carlos Sáenz-Ramírez; Vanesa Paredes; Juan-Carlos Pérez-Varela
Journal:  Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal       Date:  2013-05-01

5.  Lower incisor inclination changes during Xbow treatment according to vertical facial type.

Authors:  Carlos Flores-Mir; Arden Young; Amira Greiss; Matthew Woynorowski; James Peng
Journal:  Angle Orthod       Date:  2010-11       Impact factor: 2.079

6.  A normative study to evaluate inclination and angulation of teeth in North Indian population and comparision of expression of torque in preadjusted appliances.

Authors:  Sanjeev Verma; Sp Singh; Ashok Utreja
Journal:  J Orthod Sci       Date:  2014-07

7.  Three-dimensional measurement of tooth inclination: A longitudinal study.

Authors:  Mahtab Nouri; Sahar Khaje Hosseini; Sohrab Asefi; Amir Hossein Abdi; Alireza Akbarzadeh Bagheban
Journal:  Dent Res J (Isfahan)       Date:  2019 Jul-Aug

8.  Comparison of linear and angular changes assessed in digital dental models and cone-beam computed tomography.

Authors:  Camila Massaro; Carolina Losada; Lucia Cevidanes; Marilia Yatabe; Daniela Garib; José Roberto Pereira Lauris; Marcos Ioshida; Diego Rey; Maria Antonia Alvarez; Erika Benavides; Hector Rios; Juan Fernando Aristizabal; Antonio Carlos Ruellas
Journal:  Orthod Craniofac Res       Date:  2019-11-14       Impact factor: 1.826

9.  Comparison of arch width, alveolar width and buccolingual inclination of teeth between Class II division 1 malocclusion and Class I occlusion.

Authors:  Rui Shu; Xianglong Han; Yating Wang; Hui Xu; Dongqing Ai; Lufei Wang; Yeke Wu; Ding Bai
Journal:  Angle Orthod       Date:  2013-03       Impact factor: 2.079

10.  Evaluation of buccolingual molar inclinations among different vertical facial types.

Authors:  Feyza Eraydin; Derya Germec Cakan; Murat Tozlu; Fulya Ozdemir
Journal:  Korean J Orthod       Date:  2018-08-08       Impact factor: 1.372

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.