BACKGROUND: It has been suggested that high titres of tTG are associated with elevated positive predictive values (PPV) for celiac disease. However, the PPV of a strongly positive tTG will depend on the celiac disease prevalence in the different risk groups of the disease AIMS: To assess the PPV of a strongly positive tTG for celiac disease. In addition, to calculate the post-test probability for celiac disease of a strongly positive tTG in a setting of routine clinical practice. METHODS: 145 consecutive celiac disease patients with positive tTG, and with a small bowel biopsy were included. The PPV for different cut-off points of tTG levels for the diagnosis of celiac disease was assessed. In addition, the cut-offs associated with higher PPV were used to calculate the positive likelihood ratio. A simulation in a setting of routine clinical practice was performed to calculate the post-test probability of celiac disease. RESULTS: No cut-off level was associated with a PPV of 100%. A cut-off of 80 U/mL (11.4×upper normal limit) was associated with the higher PPV value of 98.6%. In the most frequent clinical situations, which in general have a pre-test probability <10%, the post-test probability after having a strongly positive tTG was 90% or less. CONCLUSIONS: A strongly positive tTG should not be enough to diagnose celiac disease in the most frequent clinical situations, small bowel biopsy remaining as the gold standard in these cases.
BACKGROUND: It has been suggested that high titres of tTG are associated with elevated positive predictive values (PPV) for celiac disease. However, the PPV of a strongly positive tTG will depend on the celiac disease prevalence in the different risk groups of the disease AIMS: To assess the PPV of a strongly positive tTG for celiac disease. In addition, to calculate the post-test probability for celiac disease of a strongly positive tTG in a setting of routine clinical practice. METHODS: 145 consecutive celiac disease patients with positive tTG, and with a small bowel biopsy were included. The PPV for different cut-off points of tTG levels for the diagnosis of celiac disease was assessed. In addition, the cut-offs associated with higher PPV were used to calculate the positive likelihood ratio. A simulation in a setting of routine clinical practice was performed to calculate the post-test probability of celiac disease. RESULTS: No cut-off level was associated with a PPV of 100%. A cut-off of 80 U/mL (11.4×upper normal limit) was associated with the higher PPV value of 98.6%. In the most frequent clinical situations, which in general have a pre-test probability <10%, the post-test probability after having a strongly positive tTG was 90% or less. CONCLUSIONS: A strongly positive tTG should not be enough to diagnose celiac disease in the most frequent clinical situations, small bowel biopsy remaining as the gold standard in these cases.
Authors: Amani Mubarak; Victorien M Wolters; Frits H J Gmelig-Meyling; Fiebo J W Ten Kate; Roderick H J Houwen Journal: World J Gastroenterol Date: 2012-08-28 Impact factor: 5.742
Authors: Benjamin Lebwohl; Alberto Rubio-Tapia; Asaad Assiri; Catherine Newland; Stefano Guandalini Journal: Gastrointest Endosc Clin N Am Date: 2012-08-20
Authors: Hugo A Penny; Suneil A Raju; Michelle S Lau; Lauren Js Marks; Elisabeth Mr Baggus; Julio C Bai; Gabrio Bassotti; Hetty J Bontkes; Antonio Carroccio; Mihai Danciu; Mohammad H Derakhshan; Arzu Ensari; Azita Ganji; Peter H R Green; Matt W Johnson; Sauid Ishaq; Benjamin Lebwohl; Adam Levene; Roxana Maxim; Hamid Mohaghegh Shalmani; Mohammad Rostami-Nejad; David Rowlands; Irene A Spiridon; Amitabh Srivastava; Umberto Volta; Vincenzo Villanacci; Graeme Wild; Simon S Cross; Kamran Rostami; David S Sanders Journal: Gut Date: 2020-11-02 Impact factor: 23.059
Authors: Kamran Badizadegan; David M Vanlandingham; Wesley Hampton; Kimberly M Thompson Journal: BMC Health Serv Res Date: 2020-10-20 Impact factor: 2.655
Authors: Hongling Wang; Guoying Zhou; Linjie Luo; J Bart A Crusius; Anlong Yuan; Jiguang Kou; Guifang Yang; Min Wang; Jing Wu; B Mary E von Blomberg; Servaas A Morré; A Salvador Peña; Bing Xia Journal: Medicine (Baltimore) Date: 2015-10 Impact factor: 1.817