Literature DB >> 2239795

Caloric compensation for lunches varying in fat and carbohydrate content by humans in a residential laboratory.

R W Foltin1, M W Fischman, T H Moran, B J Rolls, T H Kelly.   

Abstract

Two groups of three subjects participated in a residential study that assessed the effects of varying the macronutrient and caloric content of a required lunch meal on subsequent food choice and intake. Lunches contained 431 or 844 kcal, with the caloric differential created by manipulating the calories derived from either fat or carbohydrate (CHO). Each lunch condition (high-fat, high-CHO, low-fat, and low-CHO) was examined for 3 consecutive days. Subjects controlled their own patterns of food intake and could consume any item or number of items at any time during the day or night. There were no significant differences in total daily caloric intake across conditions, indicating that subjects compensated for the caloric content of the lunch regardless of the macronutrient content. Total daily caloric intake under the high-fat and high-CHO conditions was 2824 +/- 151 (mean +/- SEM) and 2988 +/- 187 kcal, respectively, whereas intake under the low-fat and low-CHO conditions was 2700 +/- 131 and 2890 +/- 247 kcal, respectively.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1990        PMID: 2239795     DOI: 10.1093/ajcn/52.6.969

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Clin Nutr        ISSN: 0002-9165            Impact factor:   7.045


  9 in total

1.  Dietary patterns matter: diet beverages and cardiometabolic risks in the longitudinal Coronary Artery Risk Development in Young Adults (CARDIA) Study.

Authors:  Kiyah J Duffey; Lyn M Steffen; Linda Van Horn; David R Jacobs; Barry M Popkin
Journal:  Am J Clin Nutr       Date:  2012-02-29       Impact factor: 7.045

2.  [Long-term effects of nutrition with fat-reduced foods on energy consumption and body weight].

Authors:  B Seppelt; J A Weststrate; A Reinert; D Johnson; W Lüder; H J Zunft
Journal:  Z Ernahrungswiss       Date:  1996-12

Review 3.  Energy density, energy intake, and body weight regulation in adults.

Authors:  J Philip Karl; Susan B Roberts
Journal:  Adv Nutr       Date:  2014-11-14       Impact factor: 8.701

Review 4.  Creativity needs some serendipity: Reflections on a career in ingestive behavior.

Authors:  Barbara J Rolls
Journal:  Physiol Behav       Date:  2016-02-06

Review 5.  Impact of fat substitutes on fat intake.

Authors:  G D Miller; S M Groziak
Journal:  Lipids       Date:  1996-03       Impact factor: 1.880

Review 6.  Appetite control: methodological aspects of the evaluation of foods.

Authors:  J Blundell; C de Graaf; T Hulshof; S Jebb; B Livingstone; A Lluch; D Mela; S Salah; E Schuring; H van der Knaap; M Westerterp
Journal:  Obes Rev       Date:  2010-01-29       Impact factor: 9.213

7.  Calorie reformulation: a systematic review and meta-analysis examining the effect of manipulating food energy density on daily energy intake.

Authors:  Eric Robinson; Mercedes Khuttan; India McFarland-Lesser; Zina Patel; Andrew Jones
Journal:  Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act       Date:  2022-04-22       Impact factor: 8.915

Review 8.  High-intensity sweeteners and energy balance.

Authors:  Susan E Swithers; Ashley A Martin; Terry L Davidson
Journal:  Physiol Behav       Date:  2010-01-06

9.  Reducing Calorie Intake May Not Help You Lose Body Weight.

Authors:  David Benton; Hayley A Young
Journal:  Perspect Psychol Sci       Date:  2017-06-28
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.