Literature DB >> 22397931

Comparative evaluation of live marker vaccine candidates "CP7_E2alf" and "flc11" along with C-strain "Riems" after oral vaccination.

Sandra Blome1, Andrea Aebischer, Elke Lange, Martin Hofmann, Immanuel Leifer, Willie Loeffen, Frank Koenen, Martin Beer.   

Abstract

Due to the tremendous socio-economic impact of classical swine fever (CSF) outbreaks, emergency vaccination scenarios are continuously under discussion. Unfortunately, all currently available vaccines show restrictions either in terms of marker capacities or immunogenicity. Recent research efforts were therefore directed at the design of new modified live marker vaccines. Among the most promising candidates the chimeric pestiviruses "CP7_E2alf" and "flc11" were identified. Within an international research project, these candidates were comparatively tested in challenge experiments after a single oral vaccination. Challenge infection was carried out with highly virulent CSF virus strain "Koslov", 14 or 21 days post vaccination (dpv), respectively. Safety, efficacy, and marker potential were addressed. All assessments were done in comparison with the conventional "gold standard" C-strain "Riems" vaccine. In addition to the challenge trials, multiple vaccinations with both candidates were performed to further assess their marker vaccine potential. All vaccines were safe and yielded full protection upon challenge 21 days post vaccination. Neither serological nor virological investigations showed major differences among the three vaccines. Whereas CP7_E2alf also provided clinical protection upon challenge at 14 days post vaccination, only 50% of animals vaccinated with flc11, and 83% vaccinated with C-strain "Riems" survived challenge at this time point. No marked differences were seen in protected animals. Despite the fact that all multiple-vaccinated animals stayed sero-negative in the accompanying marker test, the discriminatory assay remains a weak point due to delayed or inexistent detection of some of the vaccinated and subsequently infected animals. Nevertheless, the potential as live marker vaccines could be confirmed for both vaccine candidates. Future efforts will therefore be directed at the licensing of "Cp7_E2alf" as the first live marker vaccine for CSF.
Copyright © 2012 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22397931     DOI: 10.1016/j.vetmic.2012.02.015

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Vet Microbiol        ISSN: 0378-1135            Impact factor:   3.293


  10 in total

1.  Differentiation of classical swine fever virus infection from CP7_E2alf marker vaccination by a multiplex microsphere immunoassay.

Authors:  Hongyan Xia; Rajiv Harimoorthy; Balaje Vijayaraghavan; Sandra Blome; Frederik Widén; Martin Beer; Sándor Belák; Lihong Liu
Journal:  Clin Vaccine Immunol       Date:  2014-11-05

2.  Transfection of RNA from organ samples of infected animals represents a highly sensitive method for virus detection and recovery of classical swine fever virus.

Authors:  Denise Meyer; Stefanie Schmeiser; Alexander Postel; Paul Becher
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-05-11       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 3.  A decade of research into classical swine fever marker vaccine CP7_E2alf (Suvaxyn® CSF Marker): a review of vaccine properties.

Authors:  Sandra Blome; Kerstin Wernike; Ilona Reimann; Patricia König; Claudia Moß; Martin Beer
Journal:  Vet Res       Date:  2017-09-15       Impact factor: 3.683

4.  Generation and Immunogenicity of a Recombinant Pseudorabies Virus Co-Expressing Classical Swine Fever Virus E2 Protein and Porcine Circovirus Type 2 Capsid Protein Based on Fosmid Library Platform.

Authors:  Muhammad Abid; Teshale Teklue; Yongfeng Li; Hongxia Wu; Tao Wang; Hua-Ji Qiu; Yuan Sun
Journal:  Pathogens       Date:  2019-12-01

Review 5.  Research Progress and Challenges in Vaccine Development against Classical Swine Fever Virus.

Authors:  Qiang Wei; Yunchao Liu; Gaiping Zhang
Journal:  Viruses       Date:  2021-03-10       Impact factor: 5.048

6.  Pigs immunized with a novel E2 subunit vaccine are protected from subgenotype heterologous classical swine fever virus challenge.

Authors:  Rachel Madera; Wenjie Gong; Lihua Wang; Yulia Burakova; Karen Lleellish; Amy Galliher-Beckley; Jerome Nietfeld; Jamie Henningson; Kaimin Jia; Ping Li; Jianfa Bai; John Schlup; Scott McVey; Changchun Tu; Jishu Shi
Journal:  BMC Vet Res       Date:  2016-09-09       Impact factor: 2.741

Review 7.  Controlling of CSFV in European wild boar using oral vaccination: a review.

Authors:  Sophie Rossi; Christoph Staubach; Sandra Blome; Vittorio Guberti; Hans-Hermann Thulke; Ad Vos; Frank Koenen; Marie-Frédérique Le Potier
Journal:  Front Microbiol       Date:  2015-10-23       Impact factor: 5.640

Review 8.  Classical Swine Fever-An Updated Review.

Authors:  Sandra Blome; Christoph Staubach; Julia Henke; Jolene Carlson; Martin Beer
Journal:  Viruses       Date:  2017-04-21       Impact factor: 5.048

Review 9.  A Review of Classical Swine Fever Virus and Routes of Introduction into the United States and the Potential for Virus Establishment.

Authors:  Vienna R Brown; Sarah N Bevins
Journal:  Front Vet Sci       Date:  2018-03-05

10.  Virus Adaptation and Selection Following Challenge of Animals Vaccinated against Classical Swine Fever Virus.

Authors:  Ulrik Fahnøe; Anders Gorm Pedersen; Camille Melissa Johnston; Richard J Orton; Dirk Höper; Martin Beer; Jens Bukh; Graham J Belsham; Thomas Bruun Rasmussen
Journal:  Viruses       Date:  2019-10-10       Impact factor: 5.048

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.