Literature DB >> 22397901

Effect of surgical approach on physical activity and pain control after sacral colpopexy.

Sarah A Collins1, Paul K Tulikangas, David M O'Sullivan.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: We sought to compare recovery of activity and pain control after robotic (ROB) vs abdominal (ABD) sacral colpopexy. STUDY
DESIGN: Women undergoing ROB and ABD sacral colpopexy wore accelerometers for 7 days preoperatively and the first 10 days postoperatively. They completed postoperative pain diaries and Short Form-36 questionnaires before and after surgery.
RESULTS: At 5 days postoperatively, none of the 14 subjects in the ABD group and 4 of 28 (14.3%) in the ROB group achieved 50% total baseline activity counts (P = .283). At 10 days, 5 of 14 (35.7%) in the ABD group and 8 of 26 (30.8%) in the ROB group (P = .972) achieved 50%. Postoperative pain was similar in both groups. Short Form-36 vitality scores were lower (P = .017) after surgery in the ABD group, but not in the ROB group.
CONCLUSION: Women undergoing ROB vs ABD sacral colpopexy do not recover physical activity faster, and pain control is not improved.
Copyright © 2012 Mosby, Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22397901     DOI: 10.1016/j.ajog.2012.01.036

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol        ISSN: 0002-9378            Impact factor:   8.661


  6 in total

Review 1.  Robotic pelvic organ prolapse surgery.

Authors:  Kamran P Sajadi; Howard B Goldman
Journal:  Nat Rev Urol       Date:  2015-03-24       Impact factor: 14.432

2.  A randomised controlled trial of abdominal versus laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy for the treatment of post-hysterectomy vaginal vault prolapse: LAS study.

Authors:  R M Freeman; K Pantazis; A Thomson; J Frappell; L Bombieri; P Moran; M Slack; P Scott; M Waterfield
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2012-08-03       Impact factor: 2.894

Review 3.  Laparoscopic versus open sacrocolpopexy for treatment of prolapse of the apical segment of the vagina: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Maribel De Gouveia De Sa; Leica Sarah Claydon; Barry Whitlow; Maria Angelica Dolcet Artahona
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2015-08-07       Impact factor: 2.894

4.  Utilization and perioperative outcomes of robotic vaginal vault suspension compared to abdominal or vaginal approaches for pelvic organ prolapse.

Authors:  Hanhan Li; Jesse Sammon; Florian Roghmann; Akshay Sood; Michael Ehlert; Maxine Sun; Mani Menon; Humphrey Atiemo; Quoc-Dien Trinh
Journal:  Can Urol Assoc J       Date:  2014-03       Impact factor: 1.862

Review 5.  Robotic surgery: disruptive innovation or unfulfilled promise? A systematic review and meta-analysis of the first 30 years.

Authors:  Alan Tan; Hutan Ashrafian; Alasdair J Scott; Sam E Mason; Leanne Harling; Thanos Athanasiou; Ara Darzi
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2016-02-19       Impact factor: 4.584

6.  Robotic and laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy for pelvic organ prolapse: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Jiang Yang; Yong He; Xiaoyi Zhang; Zhi Wang; Xiaohu Zuo; Likun Gao; Li Hong
Journal:  Ann Transl Med       Date:  2021-03
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.