BACKGROUND: The after-school period is potentially a "critical window" for promoting physical activity in children. The purpose of this study was to qualitatively explore children's perceptions of the factors influencing their engagement in physical activity during the after-school period as the first phase in the development of a questionnaire. METHODS: Fifty-four South Australian children age 10-13 years participated in same gender focus groups. Transcripts, field notes, and activity documents were analyzed using content analysis. Through an inductive thematic approach, data were coded and categorized into perceived barriers and facilitators according to a social ecological model. RESULTS: Children identified a number of factors, including safety in the neighborhood and home settings, distance to and from places, weather, availability of time, perceived competence, enjoyment of physical activity, peer influence, and parent influence. New insights into bullying and teasing by peers and fear of dangerous animals and objects were revealed by the children. CONCLUSIONS: In this study, hearing children's voices allowed the emergence of factors which may not be exposed using existing surveys. These findings are grounded in children's perceptions and therefore serve as a valuable contribution to the existing literature, potentially leading to improved intervention and questionnaire design.
BACKGROUND: The after-school period is potentially a "critical window" for promoting physical activity in children. The purpose of this study was to qualitatively explore children's perceptions of the factors influencing their engagement in physical activity during the after-school period as the first phase in the development of a questionnaire. METHODS: Fifty-four South Australian children age 10-13 years participated in same gender focus groups. Transcripts, field notes, and activity documents were analyzed using content analysis. Through an inductive thematic approach, data were coded and categorized into perceived barriers and facilitators according to a social ecological model. RESULTS:Children identified a number of factors, including safety in the neighborhood and home settings, distance to and from places, weather, availability of time, perceived competence, enjoyment of physical activity, peer influence, and parent influence. New insights into bullying and teasing by peers and fear of dangerous animals and objects were revealed by the children. CONCLUSIONS: In this study, hearing children's voices allowed the emergence of factors which may not be exposed using existing surveys. These findings are grounded in children's perceptions and therefore serve as a valuable contribution to the existing literature, potentially leading to improved intervention and questionnaire design.
Authors: Amber L Vermeesch; Jiying Ling; Vicki R Voskuil; Marion Bakhoya; Stacey M Wesolek; Kelly A Bourne; Karin A Pfeiffer; Lorraine B Robbins Journal: Nurs Res Date: 2015 Sep-Oct Impact factor: 2.381
Authors: Laura Basterfield; Lauren Gardner; Jessica K Reilly; Mark S Pearce; Kathryn N Parkinson; Ashley J Adamson; John J Reilly; Stewart A Vella Journal: BMJ Open Sport Exerc Med Date: 2016-03-21
Authors: María Martínez-Andrés; Raquel Bartolomé-Gutiérrez; Beatriz Rodríguez-Martín; María Jesús Pardo-Guijarro; Miriam Garrido-Miguel; Vicente Martínez-Vizcaíno Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2020-04-27 Impact factor: 3.390
Authors: Jinfeng Zhao; Lisa Mackay; Kevin Chang; Suzanne Mavoa; Tom Stewart; Erika Ikeda; Niamh Donnellan; Melody Smith Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2019-03-12 Impact factor: 3.390