Literature DB >> 22397745

Post-mortem examination after stillbirth: views of UK-based practitioners.

Soo Downe1, Carol Kingdon, Rosey Kennedy, Hazel Norwell, Mary-Jo McLaughlin, Alexander E P Heazell.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: Worldwide, around four million stillbirths occur annually. The UK was recently ranked as 33rd out of 35 developed nations for stillbirth rates. The reasons for many stillbirths remain unexplained. Post-mortem examination (PME) can provide information for grieving families, and for future pregnancies. Rates of consent for PME are decreasing in the UK. The views of professionals may influence their approach to bereaved families, and, therefore, rates of consent. Arguably, obtaining qualitative insights into emotive areas such as PME from large numbers of practitioners is increasingly possible as electronic surveys become more sophisticated. Therefore we aimed to describe, using electronic media, the views of UK obstetricians, midwives and perinatal pathologists about PME for stillbirth. STUDY
DESIGN: 10,000 UK midwives, 1136 UK obstetricians and all 40 UK perinatal pathologists received a link to an Internet survey via their professional organizations. A box was included for free-text responses. Iterative thematic analysis generated five themes and a 'line of argument' synthesis.
RESULTS: 683 midwives, 98 obstetricians, and 11 perinatal pathologists provided open comments, generating five themes and the following line of argument: both professional views and family decision-making about postmortem after stillbirth are affected by the education and training of staff, local resources, and the quality of information available. All of these structural issues are interpreted by individual staff, women and families through personal beliefs and emotions, and professional and social discourses.
CONCLUSIONS: Internet-based surveys can generate valuable qualitative data. Effective decision-making for post-mortem after stillbirth may be improved by the introduction of user-friendly information and consent procedures, and staff training that takes account of existing innovations, and of the emotions and prior experiences of both staff and parents.
Copyright © 2012 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22397745     DOI: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2012.02.002

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol        ISSN: 0301-2115            Impact factor:   2.435


  8 in total

1.  Maternity Healthcare Chaplains and Perinatal Post-Mortem Support and Understanding in the United Kingdom and Ireland: An Exploratory Study.

Authors:  D Nuzum; B Fitzgerald; M J Evans; K O'Donoghue
Journal:  J Relig Health       Date:  2021-01-07

2.  Parental decision making around perinatal autopsy: a qualitative investigation.

Authors:  Sarah Meaney; Stephen Gallagher; Jennifer E Lutomski; Keelin O'Donoghue
Journal:  Health Expect       Date:  2014-11-06       Impact factor: 3.377

3.  Bereaved parents' experience of stillbirth in UK hospitals: a qualitative interview study.

Authors:  Soo Downe; Ellie Schmidt; Carol Kingdon; Alexander E P Heazell
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2013-02-14       Impact factor: 2.692

Review 4.  Systematic review to understand and improve care after stillbirth: a review of parents' and healthcare professionals' experiences.

Authors:  Alison Ellis; Caroline Chebsey; Claire Storey; Stephanie Bradley; Sue Jackson; Vicki Flenady; Alexander Heazell; Dimitrios Siassakos
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2016-01-25       Impact factor: 3.007

5.  Factors affecting uptake of postmortem examination in the prenatal, perinatal and paediatric setting.

Authors:  C Lewis; M Hill; O J Arthurs; C Hutchinson; L S Chitty; N J Sebire
Journal:  BJOG       Date:  2017-03-21       Impact factor: 6.531

6.  "We might get a lot more families who will agree": Muslim and Jewish perspectives on less invasive perinatal and paediatric autopsy.

Authors:  Celine Lewis; Zahira Latif; Melissa Hill; Megan Riddington; Monica Lakhanpaul; Owen J Arthurs; John C Hutchinson; Lyn S Chitty; Neil J Sebire
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-08-09       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Social support: An approach to maintaining the health of women who have experienced stillbirth.

Authors:  Maryam Allahdadian; Alireza Irajpour; Ashraf Kazemi; Gholamreza Kheirabadi
Journal:  Iran J Nurs Midwifery Res       Date:  2015 Jul-Aug

8.  The Role of Healthcare Professionals in Encouraging Parents to See and Hold Their Stillborn Baby: A Meta-Synthesis of Qualitative Studies.

Authors:  Carol Kingdon; Emer O'Donnell; Jennifer Givens; Mark Turner
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-07-08       Impact factor: 3.240

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.