Literature DB >> 22396364

Variations between two 24-hour urine collections in patients presenting to a tertiary stone clinic.

Madhur Nayan1, Mohamed A Elkoushy, Sero Andonian.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: The current Canadian Urological Association (CUA) guideline recommends two 24-hour urine collections in the metabolic evaluation for patients with urolithiasis. The aim of the present study was to compare two consecutive 24-hour urine collections in patients with a history of urolithiasis presenting to a tertiary stone clinic.
METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed 188 patients who had two 24-hour collections upon presentation between January 2010 and December 2010. Samples were collected on consecutive days and examined for the following 11 urinary parameters: volume, creatinine, sodium, calcium, uric acid, citrate, oxalate, potassium, phosphorous, magnesium and urea nitrogen. For each parameter, the absolute value of the difference between the two samples rather than the direct difference was compared with zero. Similarly, the percent difference between samples was calculated for each parameter.
RESULTS: The means of the absolute differences between the two samples were significantly different for all 11 urinary parameters (p < 0.0001). The percent differences for all urinary parameters ranged from 20.5% to 34.2%. Furthermore, 17.1% to 47.6% of patients had a change from a value within normal limits to an abnormal value, or vice-versa. Significance was maintained when patients with incomplete or over-collections were excluded.
CONCLUSIONS: Significant variations among the two 24-hour urine collections were observed in all of the 11 urinary parameters analyzed. This variation may change clinical decision-making in up to 47.6% of patients if only a single 24-hour urine collection is obtained. The present study supports the CUA guideline of performing two 24-hour urine collections.

Entities:  

Year:  2012        PMID: 22396364      PMCID: PMC3289692          DOI: 10.5489/cuaj.11131

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Can Urol Assoc J        ISSN: 1911-6470            Impact factor:   1.862


  9 in total

1.  Adequacy of a single stone risk analysis in the medical evaluation of urolithiasis.

Authors:  C Y Pak; R Peterson; J R Poindexter
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2001-02       Impact factor: 7.450

2.  A single 24-hour urine collection is inadequate for the medical evaluation of nephrolithiasis.

Authors:  Joan H Parks; Evan Goldfisher; John R Asplin; Fredric L Coe
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2002-04       Impact factor: 7.450

Review 3.  The pathogenesis and treatment of kidney stones.

Authors:  F L Coe; J H Parks; J R Asplin
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1992-10-15       Impact factor: 91.245

4.  Evaluation and medical management of the kidney stone patient.

Authors:  Ryan Paterson; Alfonso Fernandez; Hassan Razvi; Roger Sutton
Journal:  Can Urol Assoc J       Date:  2010-12       Impact factor: 1.862

Review 5.  Incidence of upper urinary tract stones.

Authors:  S Ljunghall
Journal:  Miner Electrolyte Metab       Date:  1987

6.  Comparison of comprehensive and limited metabolic evaluations in the treatment of patients with recurrent calcium urolithiasis.

Authors:  T Yagisawa; P S Chandhoke; J Fan
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  1999-05       Impact factor: 7.450

7.  Adequacy of a single 24-hour urine collection for metabolic evaluation of recurrent nephrolithiasis.

Authors:  Scott M Castle; Matthew R Cooperberg; Natalia Sadetsky; Brian H Eisner; Marshall L Stoller
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2010-06-19       Impact factor: 7.450

8.  Ambulatory evaluation of nephrolithiasis. Classification, clinical presentation and diagnostic criteria.

Authors:  C Y Pak; F Britton; R Peterson; D Ward; C Northcutt; N A Breslau; J McGuire; K Sakhaee; S Bush; M Nicar; D A Norman; P Peters
Journal:  Am J Med       Date:  1980-07       Impact factor: 4.965

9.  Ambulatory evaluation of nephrolithiasis: an update of a 1980 protocol.

Authors:  F L Levy; B Adams-Huet; C Y Pak
Journal:  Am J Med       Date:  1995-01       Impact factor: 4.965

  9 in total
  12 in total

1.  Optimizing the void.

Authors:  Richard W Norman
Journal:  Can Urol Assoc J       Date:  2012-02       Impact factor: 1.862

2.  Update on the evaluation of repeated stone formers.

Authors:  Adam O Kadlec; Thomas M Turk
Journal:  Curr Urol Rep       Date:  2013-12       Impact factor: 3.092

3.  CUA guideline on the evaluation and medical management of the kidney stone patient - 2016 update.

Authors:  Marie Dion; Ghada Ankawi; Ben Chew; Ryan Paterson; Nabil Sultan; Patti Hoddinott; Hassan Razvi
Journal:  Can Urol Assoc J       Date:  2016-11-10       Impact factor: 1.862

Review 4.  [S2k guidelines on diagnostics, therapy and metaphylaxis of urolithiasis (AWMF 043/025) : Compendium].

Authors:  T Knoll; T Bach; U Humke; A Neisius; R Stein; M Schönthaler; G Wendt-Nordahl
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2016-07       Impact factor: 0.639

5.  Combined vitamin D and calcium supplementation in vitamin D inadequate patients with urolithiasis: Impact on hypercalciuria and de novo stone formation.

Authors:  Charles Hesswani; Yasser A Noureldin; Mohamed A Elkoushy; Sero Andonian
Journal:  Can Urol Assoc J       Date:  2015-12-14       Impact factor: 1.862

6.  Renal Tubular Dysfunction in Pediatric Urolithiasis: Proteomic Evidence.

Authors:  Larisa Kovacevic; Hong Lu; Joseph A Caruso; Yegappan Lakshmanan
Journal:  Urology       Date:  2016-02-15       Impact factor: 2.649

Review 7.  Metabolic evaluation of urinary lithiasis: what urologists should know and do.

Authors:  Julien Letendre; Jonathan Cloutier; Luca Villa; Luc Valiquette
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2014-11-21       Impact factor: 4.226

8.  UPDATE - Canadian Urological Association guideline: Evaluation and medical management of kidney stones.

Authors:  Naeem Bhojani; Jennifer Bjazevic; Brendan Wallace; Linda Lee; Kamaljot S Kaler; Marie Dion; Andrea Cowan; Nabil Sultan; Ben H Chew; Hassan Razvi
Journal:  Can Urol Assoc J       Date:  2022-06       Impact factor: 2.052

Review 9.  Integration and utilization of modern technologies in nephrolithiasis research.

Authors:  Michael S Borofsky; Casey A Dauw; Andrew Cohen; James C Williams; Andrew P Evan; James E Lingeman
Journal:  Nat Rev Urol       Date:  2016-08-23       Impact factor: 14.432

10.  Effect of age, BMI, and gender on urinary risk factors in pediatric idiopathic stone formers.

Authors:  Andrew M Fang; Elena Gibson; Robert A Oster; Pankaj P Dangle
Journal:  J Pediatr Urol       Date:  2021-06-10       Impact factor: 1.921

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.