Literature DB >> 22395318

Development and validation of a new clinically-meaningful rating scale for measuring lateral canthal line severity.

Michael A Kane1, Andrew Blitzer, Fredric S Brandt, Richard G Glogau, Gary D Monheit, Rhoda S Narins, Jean A Paty, Jacob M Waugh.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Several scales have been employed for evaluating the effects of cosmetic treatments in the periorbital area. The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has recently issued new recommendations specifying a rigorous process to validate new aesthetic scales.
OBJECTIVES: The authors describe and validate a new clinical rating scale: the Investigator's Global Assessment of Lateral Canthal Line (IGA-LCL) severity scale.
METHODS: The new FDA recommendations were utilized to validate the new scale. The first step was concept elicitation (based on direct input from clinicians, patients, and literature) and evaluation of content validity (appropriateness of concepts). The resulting five-point scale provided detailed descriptions of the lateral canthal lines (LCL), including quantitative assessment of LCL length and depth. Performance parameters, including intra- and interrater reproducibility and construct validity, were then evaluated in clinical studies. Finally, the scale's threshold for clinically-meaningful benefit and the ability of the scale to detect change were confirmed in two Phase 2b clinical studies involving a total of 270 subjects.
RESULTS: Content validity was established and the IGA-LCL scale showed excellent interrater reliability (weighted Kappa = 0.89) and interrater reliability (weighted Kappa = 0.77; Kendall's coefficient of concordance = 0.89). In clinical trials, the scale was sensitive enough to detect clinically-meaningful one- and two-point changes in LCL severity following treatment with topical botulinum toxin type A (BoNT-A). The authors observed statistically-significant correlations between the physician-rated IGA-LCL results and patient-reported outcomes.
CONCLUSIONS: The IGA-LCL scale was shown to be reliable, appropriate, and clinically meaningful for measuring LCL severity.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22395318     DOI: 10.1177/1090820X12437784

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Aesthet Surg J        ISSN: 1090-820X            Impact factor:   4.283


  6 in total

Review 1.  Key Parameters for the Use of AbobotulinumtoxinA in Aesthetics: Onset and Duration.

Authors:  Mark Nestor; Glynis Ablon; Andy Pickett
Journal:  Aesthet Surg J       Date:  2017-05-01       Impact factor: 4.283

2.  Botulinum toxin type A for facial wrinkles.

Authors:  Cristina Pires Camargo; Jun Xia; Caroline S Costa; Rolf Gemperli; Maria Dc Tatini; Max K Bulsara; Rachel Riera
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2021-07-05

3.  Validity, reliability, and the questionable role of psychometrics in plastic surgery.

Authors:  Eric Swanson
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open       Date:  2014-07-09

4.  Development and Validation of a Photonumeric Scale for Evaluation of Facial Fine Lines.

Authors:  Jean Carruthers; Lisa Donofrio; Bhushan Hardas; Diane K Murphy; Derek Jones; Alastair Carruthers; Jonathan M Sykes; Lela Creutz; Ann Marx; Sara Dill
Journal:  Dermatol Surg       Date:  2016-10       Impact factor: 3.398

5.  Development and Validation of a Photonumeric Scale for Evaluation of Infraorbital Hollows.

Authors:  Lisa Donofrio; Jean Carruthers; Bhushan Hardas; Diane K Murphy; Derek Jones; Jonathan M Sykes; Alastair Carruthers; Lela Creutz; Ann Marx; Sara Dill
Journal:  Dermatol Surg       Date:  2016-10       Impact factor: 3.398

6.  A Comparative In Vivo Study on Three Treatment Approaches to Applying Topical Botulinum Toxin A for Crow's Feet.

Authors:  Yan Cao; Jian-Ping Yang; Xiao-Gang Zhu; Jie Zhu; Hong-Qin Chang; Sheng-Hua Guo; Dan Luo; Bing-Rong Zhou
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2018-07-03       Impact factor: 3.411

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.