Literature DB >> 22395301

Computer-assisted mandibular reconstruction with vascularized iliac crest bone graft.

Ali Modabber1, Marcus Gerressen, Maria Barbara Stiller, Nelson Noroozi, Alexander Füglein, Frank Hölzle, Dieter Riediger, Alireza Ghassemi.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The intention of mandibular reconstructive surgery is to achieve maximum possible functionality, which means the restoration of masticatory function and speech with a good esthetic result.
METHODS: We compared five computer-assisted mandibular reconstructions with 15 conventional mandibular reconstructions performed using vascularized iliac crest bone grafts. Based on preoperative cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) or CT data imported into the specific surgical planning software, a surgical guide was designed by rapid prototyping that helped to exactly translate the virtual surgery plan into the operation site whereby it fit uniquely to the iliac donor site. The ischemic time of the graft was measured intraoperatively and the difference between the amount of bone removed and the amount of bone required was determined. In addition, 3 months after surgery patients had to score the esthetics of their outer appearance using a visual analog scale.
RESULTS: In all patients the graft fit perfectly into the mandibular defect without major adjustments. The time for the shaping process of the transplant and the ischemic time were shorter than in the conventional grafting procedure. The virtual plan reduced the amount of bone removed to the required volume. The patients who underwent computer-assisted reconstruction had a higher degree of satisfaction with their outer appearance.
CONCLUSION: Our clinical experience and the collected data suggest that the described method is very promising for optimizing the surgical result of mandibular reconstructions using iliac crest bone grafts and achieving an excellent esthetic outcome. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE IV: This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22395301     DOI: 10.1007/s00266-012-9877-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Aesthetic Plast Surg        ISSN: 0364-216X            Impact factor:   2.326


  8 in total

1.  Planning of mandibular reconstructions based on statistical shape models.

Authors:  Stefan Raith; Sebastian Wolff; Timm Steiner; Ali Modabber; Michael Weber; Frank Hölzle; Horst Fischer
Journal:  Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg       Date:  2016-07-08       Impact factor: 2.924

2.  Three-dimensional evaluation of the different donor sites of the mandible for autologous bone grafts.

Authors:  Stephan Christian Möhlhenrich; Nicole Heussen; Nassim Ayoub; Frank Hölzle; Ali Modabber
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2014-03-26       Impact factor: 3.573

3.  Evaluation of computer-assisted mandibular reconstruction with vascularized iliac crest bone graft compared to conventional surgery: a randomized prospective clinical trial.

Authors:  Nassim Ayoub; Alireza Ghassemi; Majeed Rana; Marcus Gerressen; Dieter Riediger; Frank Hölzle; Ali Modabber
Journal:  Trials       Date:  2014-04-09       Impact factor: 2.279

Review 4.  3D-printing techniques in a medical setting: a systematic literature review.

Authors:  Philip Tack; Jan Victor; Paul Gemmel; Lieven Annemans
Journal:  Biomed Eng Online       Date:  2016-10-21       Impact factor: 2.819

5.  New frontiers and emerging applications of 3D printing in ENT surgery: a systematic review of the literature.

Authors:  P Canzi; M Magnetto; S Marconi; P Morbini; S Mauramati; F Aprile; I Avato; F Auricchio; M Benazzo
Journal:  Acta Otorhinolaryngol Ital       Date:  2018-08       Impact factor: 2.124

Review 6.  Review of surgical resection and reconstruction in head and neck cancer. Traditional versus current concepts.

Authors:  Afnan F Alfouzan
Journal:  Saudi Med J       Date:  2018-10       Impact factor: 1.484

Review 7.  Comparing the use of conventional and three-dimensional printing (3DP) in mandibular reconstruction.

Authors:  Ailis Truscott; Reza Zamani; Mohammad Akrami
Journal:  Biomed Eng Online       Date:  2022-03-19       Impact factor: 2.819

8.  The accuracy of computer-assisted primary mandibular reconstruction with vascularized bone flaps: iliac crest bone flap versus osteomyocutaneous fibula flap.

Authors:  Ali Modabber; Nassim Ayoub; Stephan Christian Möhlhenrich; Evgeny Goloborodko; Tolga Taha Sönmez; Mehrangiz Ghassemi; Christina Loberg; Bernd Lethaus; Alireza Ghassemi; Frank Hölzle
Journal:  Med Devices (Auckl)       Date:  2014-06-16
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.