Literature DB >> 22395272

The effect of nonleading foot placement on power and velocity in the fencing lunge.

Carolyn N Gresham-Fiegel1, Paul D House, Michael F Zupan.   

Abstract

The fencing lunge is a sport-specific movement, which helps the fencer score quickly and accurately. The fencing lunge is executed from a stable guard position, with the toes of the leading foot pointing directly toward the opponent. As a result of coach or fencer preference, however, the angle of the nonleading foot may vary greatly among fencers, from acute (nonleading foot facing forward) to obtuse (nonleading foot facing slightly backward). Studies in other sports suggest that foot placement may affect the efficient use of leg muscles and influence the power produced. Twenty-five experienced fencers from the U.S. Air Force Academy fencing team executed lunges from 3 specific angles of nonleading foot placement and from the natural stance. Foot placements were measured as the angle of the nonleading foot from the line of the leading foot and were delimited to an acute angle (45°), a perpendicular angle (90°), and an obtuse angle (135°). The angle of natural stance was also determined for each participant. Velocity and power were measured with a TENDO Weightlifting Analyzer, and the data were analyzed with repeated measures analysis of variance. Two statistical groups were considered, one containing all participants (N = 25) and a second group of participants with a natural forward-deviated stance (n = 15). Significant differences appeared between the nonleading foot placements in peak power (p < 0.001), average power (p < 0.001), peak velocity (p < 0.001), and average velocity (p < 0.001) in both groups. Pairwise t-test results indicated that, for both statistical groups, a perpendicular placement of the feet produced the greatest power and velocity during lunging.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 22395272     DOI: 10.1519/JSC.0b013e31824e0e9d

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Strength Cond Res        ISSN: 1064-8011            Impact factor:   3.775


  4 in total

1.  Biomechanics of fencing sport: A scoping review.

Authors:  Tony Lin-Wei Chen; Duo Wai-Chi Wong; Yan Wang; Sicong Ren; Fei Yan; Ming Zhang
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-02-10       Impact factor: 3.240

2.  Kinematic determinants of scoring success in the fencing flick: Logistic and linear multiple regression analysis.

Authors:  Anya N Michaelsen; Corey L Cleland
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-09-25       Impact factor: 3.240

3.  Asymptomatic foot and ankle structural injuries: a 3D imaging and finite element analysis of elite fencers.

Authors:  Congfei Lu; Yuxuan Fan; Genyu Yu; Hua Chen; Jonathan Sinclair; Yifang Fan
Journal:  BMC Sports Sci Med Rehabil       Date:  2022-03-27

4.  Uninjured Youth Athlete Performance on Single-Leg Hop Testing: How Many Can Achieve Recommended Return-to-Sport Criterion?

Authors:  Elliot M Greenberg; Julie Dyke; Anne Leung; Michael Karl; J Todd Lawrence; Theodore Ganley
Journal:  Sports Health       Date:  2020-05-11       Impact factor: 3.843

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.