Literature DB >> 22395099

Cancer risk modelling and radiological protection.

Richard Wakeford1.   

Abstract

Statistical models describing how the radiation-related risks of particular types of cancer vary with the doses of radiation received by specific tissues are derived from data gathered in epidemiological studies of exposed groups of people, guided by an incomplete understanding of radiobiological mechanisms gleaned from experimental studies. Cancer risk models have been developed for a dozen or so different types of cancer, and take account of the effect of important risk modifying factors such as age at exposure and time since exposure. Of primary importance in the development of cancer risk models is the experience of the Japanese atomic bomb survivors, but other exposed groups contribute information, including those exposed to radiation from internally deposited radioactive material, such as inhaled radon. Cancer risk models predict that at low doses or low dose rates the excess risk of cancer is directly proportional to the dose of radiation received, with no threshold dose--the linear no threshold (LNT) dose-response model--and the inferred summary estimate of the overall average lifetime excess risk of developing a serious cancer is ∼ 5%/Sv. It is these cancer risk models and this inferred nominal risk estimate that provide the technical basis of radiological protection. Although it is difficult to definitively test the LNT model at low doses or low dose rates, because the predicted excess risk is small compared with fluctuations in the baseline risk, evidence exists that a small risk of cancer results from low-level exposure to radiation and that the excess risk is around that predicted by current risk models.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22395099     DOI: 10.1088/0952-4746/32/1/N89

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Radiol Prot        ISSN: 0952-4746            Impact factor:   1.394


  2 in total

1.  How is the risk of radiation-induced cancer influenced by background risk factors? Invited commentary on "a method for determining weights for excess relative risk and excess absolute risk when applied in the calculation of lifetime risk of cancer from radiation exposure" by Walsh and Schneider (2012).

Authors:  Mark P Little; Richard Wakeford
Journal:  Radiat Environ Biophys       Date:  2012-11-20       Impact factor: 1.925

2.  Risk of cancer associated with cardiac catheterization procedures during childhood: a cohort study in France.

Authors:  Helene Baysson; Jean Luc Réhel; Younes Boudjemline; Jerôme Petit; Brigitte Girodon; Bernard Aubert; Dominique Laurier; Damien Bonnet; Marie-Odile Bernier
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2013-03-22       Impact factor: 3.295

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.