Lawrence K Fung1, Eve-Marie Quintin, Brian W Haas, Allan L Reiss. 1. Center for Interdisciplinary Brain Sciences Research, Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California 94305–5719, USA.
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW: The overarching goal of this review is to compare and contrast the cognitive-behavioral features of fragile X syndrome (FraX) and Williams syndrome and to review the putative neural and molecular underpinnings of these features. Information is presented in a framework that provides guiding principles for conceptualizing gene-brain-behavior associations in neurodevelopmental disorders. RECENT FINDINGS: Abnormalities, in particular cognitive-behavioral domains with similarities in underlying neurodevelopmental correlates, occur in both FraX and Williams syndrome including aberrant frontostriatal pathways leading to executive function deficits, and magnocellular/dorsal visual stream, superior parietal lobe, inferior parietal lobe, and postcentral gyrus abnormalities contributing to deficits in visuospatial function. Compelling cognitive-behavioral and neurodevelopmental contrasts also exist in these two disorders, for example, aberrant amygdala and fusiform cortex structure and function occurring in the context of contrasting social behavioral phenotypes, and temporal cortical and cerebellar abnormalities potentially underlying differences in language function. Abnormal dendritic development is a shared neurodevelopmental morphologic feature between FraX and Williams syndrome. Commonalities in molecular machinery and processes across FraX and Williams syndrome occur as well - microRNAs involved in translational regulation of major synaptic proteins; scaffolding proteins in excitatory synapses; and proteins involved in axonal development. SUMMARY: Although the genetic variations leading to FraX and Williams syndrome are different, important similarities and contrasts in the phenotype, neurocircuitry, molecular machinery, and cellular processes in these two disorders allow for a unique approach to conceptualizing gene-brain-behavior links occurring in neurodevelopmental disorders.
PURPOSE OF REVIEW: The overarching goal of this review is to compare and contrast the cognitive-behavioral features of fragile X syndrome (FraX) and Williams syndrome and to review the putative neural and molecular underpinnings of these features. Information is presented in a framework that provides guiding principles for conceptualizing gene-brain-behavior associations in neurodevelopmental disorders. RECENT FINDINGS: Abnormalities, in particular cognitive-behavioral domains with similarities in underlying neurodevelopmental correlates, occur in both FraX and Williams syndrome including aberrant frontostriatal pathways leading to executive function deficits, and magnocellular/dorsal visual stream, superior parietal lobe, inferior parietal lobe, and postcentral gyrus abnormalities contributing to deficits in visuospatial function. Compelling cognitive-behavioral and neurodevelopmental contrasts also exist in these two disorders, for example, aberrant amygdala and fusiform cortex structure and function occurring in the context of contrasting social behavioral phenotypes, and temporal cortical and cerebellar abnormalities potentially underlying differences in language function. Abnormal dendritic development is a shared neurodevelopmental morphologic feature between FraX and Williams syndrome. Commonalities in molecular machinery and processes across FraX and Williams syndrome occur as well - microRNAs involved in translational regulation of major synaptic proteins; scaffolding proteins in excitatory synapses; and proteins involved in axonal development. SUMMARY: Although the genetic variations leading to FraX and Williams syndrome are different, important similarities and contrasts in the phenotype, neurocircuitry, molecular machinery, and cellular processes in these two disorders allow for a unique approach to conceptualizing gene-brain-behavior links occurring in neurodevelopmental disorders.
Authors: M J W Van der Molen; M W Van der Molen; K R Ridderinkhof; B C J Hamel; L M G Curfs; G J A Ramakers Journal: Clin Neurophysiol Date: 2011-09-29 Impact factor: 3.708
Authors: Michael Feyder; Rose-Marie Karlsson; Poonam Mathur; Matthew Lyman; Roland Bock; Reza Momenan; Jeeva Munasinghe; Maria Luisa Scattoni; Jessica Ihne; Marguerite Camp; Carolyn Graybeal; Douglas Strathdee; Alison Begg; Veronica A Alvarez; Peter Kirsch; Marcella Rietschel; Sven Cichon; Henrik Walter; Andreas Meyer-Lindenberg; Seth G N Grant; Andrew Holmes Journal: Am J Psychiatry Date: 2010-10-15 Impact factor: 18.112
Authors: Andreas Meyer-Lindenberg; Ahmad R Hariri; Karen E Munoz; Carolyn B Mervis; Venkata S Mattay; Colleen A Morris; Karen Faith Berman Journal: Nat Neurosci Date: 2005-07-10 Impact factor: 24.884
Authors: Linda E Campbell; Eileen Daly; Fiona Toal; Angela Stevens; Rayna Azuma; Marco Catani; Virginia Ng; Therese van Amelsvoort; Xavier Chitnis; William Cutter; Declan G M Murphy; Kieran C Murphy Journal: Brain Date: 2006-03-28 Impact factor: 13.501
Authors: Heather Cody Hazlett; Michele D Poe; Amy A Lightbody; Guido Gerig; James R Macfall; Allison K Ross; James Provenzale; Arianna Martin; Allan L Reiss; Joseph Piven Journal: J Neurodev Disord Date: 2009-03 Impact factor: 4.025
Authors: Cary S Kogan; Isabelle Boutet; Kim Cornish; Shahin Zangenehpour; Kathy T Mullen; Jeanette J A Holden; Vazken M Der Kaloustian; Eva Andermann; Avi Chaudhuri Journal: Brain Date: 2004-01-21 Impact factor: 13.501
Authors: Zhenjie Zhang; Samuele G Marro; Yingsha Zhang; Kristin L Arendt; Christopher Patzke; Bo Zhou; Tyler Fair; Nan Yang; Thomas C Südhof; Marius Wernig; Lu Chen Journal: Sci Transl Med Date: 2018-08-01 Impact factor: 17.956
Authors: Andrew T N Tebbenkamp; Luis Varela; Jinmyung Choi; Miguel I Paredes; Alice M Giani; Jae Eun Song; Matija Sestan-Pesa; Daniel Franjic; André M M Sousa; Zhong-Wu Liu; Mingfeng Li; Candace Bichsel; Marco Koch; Klara Szigeti-Buck; Fuchen Liu; Zhuo Li; Yuka I Kawasawa; Constantinos D Paspalas; Yann S Mineur; Paolo Prontera; Giuseppe Merla; Marina R Picciotto; Amy F T Arnsten; Tamas L Horvath; Nenad Sestan Journal: Cell Date: 2018-11-01 Impact factor: 41.582
Authors: Manish Saggar; S M Hadi Hosseini; Jennifer L Bruno; Eve-Marie Quintin; Mira M Raman; Shelli R Kesler; Allan L Reiss Journal: Neuroimage Date: 2015-07-08 Impact factor: 6.556
Authors: Petya D Radoeva; Ravi Bansal; Kevin M Antshel; Wanda Fremont; Bradley S Peterson; Wendy R Kates Journal: J Child Psychol Psychiatry Date: 2016-10-27 Impact factor: 8.982
Authors: Elizabeth Berry-Kravis; David Hessl; Leonard Abbeduto; Allan L Reiss; Andrea Beckel-Mitchener; Tiina K Urv Journal: J Dev Behav Pediatr Date: 2013-09 Impact factor: 2.225
Authors: Manish Saggar; Elizabeth Walter Shelly; Jean-Francois Lepage; Fumiko Hoeft; Allan L Reiss Journal: Neuroimage Date: 2013-09-29 Impact factor: 6.556
Authors: Dejan B Budimirovic; Elizabeth Berry-Kravis; Craig A Erickson; Scott S Hall; David Hessl; Allan L Reiss; Margaret K King; Leonard Abbeduto; Walter E Kaufmann Journal: J Neurodev Disord Date: 2017-06-12 Impact factor: 4.025