Literature DB >> 22394983

Denosumab dose selection for patients with bone metastases from solid tumors.

Sameer Doshi1, Liviawati Sutjandra, Jenny Zheng, Winnie Sohn, Mark Peterson, Graham Jang, Andrew T Chow, Juan Jose Pérez-Ruixo.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To quantitatively characterize the longitudinal dose exposure-response [urinary N-telopeptide normalized to urinary creatinine (uNTx/Cr) suppression] relationship for denosumab in patients with bone metastases from solid tumors. EXPERIMENTAL
DESIGN: Data from 373 patients who received denosumab as single or multiple subcutaneous doses ranging from 30 to 180 mg (or 0.01 to 3 mg/kg) administered every 4 or 12 weeks for up to 3 years were used in this analysis. An inhibitory sigmoid I(Max) model was used to characterize the time course of uNTx/Cr as a function of serum denosumab concentrations and the M3 method was used to analyze the 52% of uNTx/Cr values below the limit of quantification in the context of a mixed-effects model. Age, weight, sex, race, and cancer type were evaluated as potential covariates for model parameters. Model-based simulations were undertaken to explore and predict the role of denosumab dose and dosing intervals on uNTx/Cr suppression.
RESULTS: The typical value (between-subject variability; %) for uNTx/Cr at baseline was 49.2 nmol/L/mmol/L (76.8%), denosumab maximal uNTx/Cr suppression (efficacy) was 93.7% (127%), and the denosumab concentration providing half-maximal uNTx/Cr suppression (potency) was 31.8 ng/mL (287%). No effect of covariates on denosumab efficacy and potency was identified. Simulations indicated that a s.c. denosumab dose of 120 mg administered every 4 weeks provides more than 90% suppression of uNTx/Cr in the maximum proportion of patients relative to other every 4- and 12-week doses evaluated.
CONCLUSIONS: Over the wide range of dosing regimens examined, a s.c. denosumab dose of 120 mg administered every 4 weeks is the optimal dosing regimen to suppress uNTx/Cr in patients with bone metastases from solid tumors. Clin Cancer Res; 18(9); 2648-57. ©2012 AACR.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22394983     DOI: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-11-2944

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Cancer Res        ISSN: 1078-0432            Impact factor:   12.531


  6 in total

1.  Using early biomarker data to predict long-term bone mineral density: application of semi-mechanistic bone cycle model on denosumab data.

Authors:  Jenny Zheng; Erno van Schaick; Liviawati Sutjandra Wu; Philippe Jacqmin; Juan Jose Perez Ruixo
Journal:  J Pharmacokinet Pharmacodyn       Date:  2015-06-30       Impact factor: 2.745

Review 2.  Bone-targeted therapies for elderly patients with renal cell carcinoma: current and future directions.

Authors:  Thomas Roza; Lukman Hakim; Hendrik van Poppel; Steven Joniau
Journal:  Drugs Aging       Date:  2013-11       Impact factor: 3.923

Review 3.  The pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of denosumab in patients with advanced solid tumours and bone metastases: a systematic review.

Authors:  Winnie Sohn; Mary Ann Simiens; Kelly Jaeger; Shauna Hutton; Graham Jang
Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2014-09       Impact factor: 4.335

Review 4.  A systematic review of dosing frequency with bone-targeted agents for patients with bone metastases from breast cancer.

Authors:  Brian Hutton; Christina L Addison; Kaitryn Campbell; Dean Fergusson; Sasha Mazarello; Mark Clemons
Journal:  J Bone Oncol       Date:  2013-05-15       Impact factor: 4.072

5.  Safety of long-term denosumab therapy: results from the open label extension phase of two phase 3 studies in patients with metastatic breast and prostate cancer.

Authors:  Alison T Stopeck; Karim Fizazi; Jean-Jacques Body; Janet E Brown; Michael Carducci; Ingo Diel; Yasuhiro Fujiwara; Miguel Martín; Alexander Paterson; Katia Tonkin; Neal Shore; Paul Sieber; Frank Kueppers; Lawrence Karsh; Denise Yardley; Huei Wang; Tapan Maniar; Jorge Arellano; Ada Braun
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2015-09-03       Impact factor: 3.603

6.  Efficacy and safety of de-escalation bone- modifying agents for cancer patients with bone metastases: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Cun Liu; Lu Wang; Lijuan Liu; Jing Zhuang; Shifeng Tang; Tiansong Zhang; Chao Zhou; Fubin Feng; Ruijuan Liu; Jinmei Zhang; Tingting Zhang; Chundi Gao; Huayao Li; Jia Li; Changgang Sun
Journal:  Cancer Manag Res       Date:  2018-09-21       Impact factor: 3.989

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.