Literature DB >> 22394383

Comparison of optic nerve head parameters using Heidelberg Retina Tomograph 3 and spectral-domain optical coherence tomography.

Shino Sato1, Kazuyuki Hirooka, Tetsuya Baba, Fumio Shiraga.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: To assess the agreement between the Heidelberg Retina Tomograph and Cirrus spectral-domain optical coherence tomography (Cirrus HD-OCT [Carl Zeiss Meditec, Dublin, CA, USA]) when measuring optic disc parameters.
DESIGN: Prospective, cross-sectional study. PARTICIPANTS: A total of 96 glaucoma patients and 21 normal subjects were analysed.
METHODS: Optic nerve head measurements, including disc area, rim area, cup-to-disc ratio and cup volume were obtained using both the Cirrus HD-OCT and Heidelberg Retina Tomograph 3 (Heidelberg Engineering GmbH, Heidelberg, Germany). MAIN OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS: Bland-Altman plots were used to evaluate the agreement between each of the optic disc parameters.
RESULTS: Although Cirrus HD-OCT values were smaller than Heidelberg Retina Tomograph 3 values for the disc and rim areas, overall the Cirrus HD-OCT and Heidelberg Retina Tomograph 3 measurements were highly correlated (r = 0.657 to 0.821). As compared with Heidelberg Retina Tomograph 3, disc and rim areas tended to be minimized by Cirrus HD-OCT, especially when there were large disc and rim areas, although there was no relationship between the discrepancy and the level of measurement of the cup-to-disc ratio. The optical coherence tomography overestimated the Heidelberg Retina Tomograph-determined cup volume, especially when there were large cup volumes.
CONCLUSIONS: Bland-Altman analyses revealed that with the exception of the cup-to-disc ratio, there was poor agreement between the Cirrus HD-OCT and Heidelberg Retina Tomograph 3 morphometric measurements. In addition, with the exception of the cup-to-disc ratio, the optic nerve head measurements could not be directly compared between the Cirrus HD-OCT and Heidelberg Retina Tomograph 3.
© 2012 The Authors. Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology © 2012 Royal Australian and New Zealand College of Ophthalmologists.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22394383     DOI: 10.1111/j.1442-9071.2012.02782.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Exp Ophthalmol        ISSN: 1442-6404            Impact factor:   4.207


  7 in total

1.  The Management of Glaucoma: Structure and Function.

Authors:  Kazuyuki Hirooka; Tomomi Higashide; Jin Wook Jeoung
Journal:  J Ophthalmol       Date:  2018-04-22       Impact factor: 1.909

2.  HRT for the Diagnosis and Detection of Glaucoma Progression.

Authors:  Jessica S Maslin; Kaweh Mansouri; Syril K Dorairaj
Journal:  Open Ophthalmol J       Date:  2015-05-15

3.  Optic disc topography in Malay patients with normal-tension glaucoma and primary open-angle glaucoma.

Authors:  Abdul Rahim Adlina; Koh Alisa-Victoria; Ismail Shatriah; Ahmad Tajudin Liza-Sharmini; Mt Saad Ahmad
Journal:  Clin Ophthalmol       Date:  2014-12-12

4.  Assessment of the optic disc morphology using spectral-domain optical coherence tomography and scanning laser ophthalmoscopy.

Authors:  Pilar Calvo; Antonio Ferreras; Beatriz Abadia; Mirian Ara; Michele Figus; Luis E Pablo; Paolo Frezzotti
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2014-07-06       Impact factor: 3.411

5.  Repeatability Using Automatic Tracing with Canon OCT- HS100 and Zeiss Cirrus HD-OCT 5000.

Authors:  Rune Brautaset; Ulrika Birkeldh; Petra Frehr Alstig; Petra Wikén; Maria Nilsson
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-02-11       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Influence of Disc Size on the Diagnostic Accuracy of Cirrus Spectral-Domain Optical Coherence Tomography in Glaucoma.

Authors:  Shino Sato; Kaori Ukegawa; Eri Nitta; Kazuyuki Hirooka
Journal:  J Ophthalmol       Date:  2018-04-11       Impact factor: 1.909

7.  Optic nerve head parameters of high-definition optical coherence tomography and Heidelberg retina tomogram in perimetric and preperimetric glaucoma.

Authors:  Viquar Unnisa Begum; Uday Kumar Addepalli; Sirisha Senthil; Chandra Sekhar Garudadri; Harsha Laxmana Rao
Journal:  Indian J Ophthalmol       Date:  2016-04       Impact factor: 1.848

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.