Literature DB >> 22394041

Comparison of self-gripping mesh with mesh fixation with fibrin-glue in laparoscopic hernia repair (TAPP).

M Cambal1, P Zonca, B Hrbaty.   

Abstract

AIM: Comparison of self-gripping mesh with fibrin-glue mesh fixation for laparoscopic hernia repair using TAPP technique.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: The trial has a prospective randomized design. The primary end-point was the evaluation of pain at 2 days, 1 month, and 3 months after surgery. The pain occurring 3 months after the surgery was considered as chronic pain.
RESULTS: We have compared a group of 50 patients with self-gripping mesh with a group of 50 patients with fibrin glue mesh fixation using TAPP technique. There was no statistical difference between the basic group parameters (sex distribution, average age). There was no significant difference between the groups in terms of postoperative pain 1 month and 3 months after the surgery (p>0.05). There was no patient with chronic pain at 3-month follow-up in our trial. The mean operation time was 44 minutes in the group with self-gripping mesh and 48.5 minutes in the group with fibrin glue mesh fixation. There was a significant difference between both groups (p=0.006)
CONCLUSION: Both fixation methods appear to be a well-tolerated alternative to classical methods for mesh fixation with clips. According to our trial there is no difference in the postoperative pain incidence in self-gripping mesh and fibrin glue mesh fixation groups for laparoscopic hernia repair. Our data has showed that self-gripping mesh represents a tendency to a faster technique in comparison with fibrin-glue fixation. Both techniques are easy-to-use. There is no superior technique according to our trial (Tab. 2, Fig. 2, Ref. 23).

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22394041     DOI: 10.4149/bll_2012_024

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Bratisl Lek Listy        ISSN: 0006-9248            Impact factor:   1.278


  8 in total

Review 1.  Fibrin glue versus staple for mesh fixation in laparoscopic transabdominal preperitoneal repair of inguinal hernia: a meta-analysis and systematic review.

Authors:  Zhaoqi Shi; Xiaoxiao Fan; Shuting Zhai; Xin Zhong; Diyu Huang
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2016-06-28       Impact factor: 4.584

2.  Prospective randomized study comparing single-incision laparoscopic versus multi-trocar laparoscopic totally extraperitoneal (TEP) inguinal hernia repair at 2 years.

Authors:  Luca Cardinali; Claudia Hannele Mazzetti; Anny Cadenas Febres; Deborah Repullo; Jean Bruyns; Giovanni Dapri
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2018-01-23       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 3.  Mesh fixation in endoscopic inguinal hernia repair: evaluation of methodology based on a systematic review of randomised clinical trials.

Authors:  Hans Lederhuber; Franziska Stiede; Stephan Axer; Ursula Dahlstrand
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2017-04-14       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 4.  The comparison of self-gripping mesh and conventional mesh in laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair: the results of meta-analysis.

Authors:  Dianchen Wang; Jianwu Jiang; Yang Fu; Pan Qu
Journal:  Updates Surg       Date:  2022-01-16

Review 5.  Varying convalescence recommendations after inguinal hernia repair: a systematic scoping review.

Authors:  S Harmankaya; S Öberg; J Rosenberg
Journal:  Hernia       Date:  2022-06-29       Impact factor: 2.920

6.  International guidelines for groin hernia management.

Authors: 
Journal:  Hernia       Date:  2018-01-12       Impact factor: 4.739

7.  Biomechanical evaluation of three fixation modalities for preperitoneal inguinal hernia repair: a 24-hour postoperative study in pigs.

Authors:  Gaëtan Guérin; Xavier Bourges; Frédéric Turquier
Journal:  Med Devices (Auckl)       Date:  2014-12-09

Review 8.  Fibrin Sealant: The Only Approved Hemostat, Sealant, and Adhesive-a Laboratory and Clinical Perspective.

Authors:  William D Spotnitz
Journal:  ISRN Surg       Date:  2014-03-04
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.