Literature DB >> 22393810

Source attribution for mercury deposition in the contiguous United States: regional difference and seasonal variation.

Che-Jen Lin1, Suraj K Shetty, Li Pan, Pruek Pongprueksa, Carey Jang, Hsing-Wei Chu.   

Abstract

Quantifying the contribution of emission sources responsible for mercury deposition in specific receptor regions helps develop emission control strategies that alleviate the impact on ecosystem and human health. In light of the maximum available control technology (MACT) rules proposed by U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) and the ongoing intergovernmental negotiation coordinated by United Nations Environmental Programme (UNEP) for mercury, the Community Multiscale Air Quality Modeling System (CMAQ-Hg) was applied to estimate the source contribution in six subregions of the contiguous United States (CONUS). The considered source categories include electric generating units (EGU), iron and steel industry (IRST), other industrial point sources excluding EGU and IRST (OIPM), the remaining anthropogenic sources (RA), natural processes (NAT), and out-of-boundary transport (BC). It is found that, on an annual basis, dry deposition accounts for two-thirds of total annual deposition in CONUS (474 Mg yr(-1)), mainly contributed by reactive gaseous mercury (about 60% of total deposition). The contribution from large point sources can be as high as 75% near the emission sources (< 100 km), indicating that emission reduction may result in direct deposition decrease near the source locations. Out-of-boundary transport contributes from 68% (Northeast) to 91% (West Central) of total deposition. Excluding the contribution from out-of boundary transport, EGU contributes to about 50% of deposition in the Northeast, Southeast, and East Central regions, whereas emissions from natural processes are more important in the Pacific and West Central regions (contributing up to 40% of deposition). This suggests that the implementation of the new EPA MACT standards will significantly benefit only these three regions. Emission speciation is a key factor for local deposition. The source contribution exhibits strong seasonal variation. Deposition is greater in warm seasons due to stronger Hg0 oxidation. However, the contribution from anthropogenic sources is smaller in warm seasons because of larger emissions from natural processes and stronger vertical mixing that facilitates transport.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22393810     DOI: 10.1080/10473289.2011.622066

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Air Waste Manag Assoc        ISSN: 1096-2247            Impact factor:   2.235


  5 in total

1.  Source contribution analysis of mercury deposition using an enhanced CALPUFF-Hg in the central Pearl River Delta, China.

Authors:  Hui Xu; Yun Zhu; Long Wang; Che-Jen Lin; Carey Jang; Qin Zhou; Bin Yu; Shuxiao Wang; Jia Xing; Lian Yu
Journal:  Environ Pollut       Date:  2019-04-06       Impact factor: 8.071

2.  Gaseous Oxidized Mercury Dry Deposition Measurements in the Four Corners Area, U.S.A., after Large Power Plant Mercury Emission Reductions.

Authors:  Mark E Sather; Shaibal Mukerjee; Luther Smith; Johnson Mathew; Clarence Jackson; Michael Flournoy
Journal:  Atmos Pollut Res       Date:  2021       Impact factor: 4.352

3.  Source Attribution for Mercury Deposition with an Updated Atmospheric Mercury Emission Inventory in the Pearl River Delta Region, China.

Authors:  Jiajun Liu; Long Wang; Yun Zhu; Che-Jen Lin; Carey Jang; Shuxiao Wang; Jia Xing; Bin Yu; Hui Xu; Yuzhou Pan
Journal:  Front Environ Sci Eng       Date:  2018

4.  Gaseous oxidized mercury dry deposition measurements in the southwestern USA: a comparison between Texas, eastern Oklahoma, and the Four Corners area.

Authors:  Mark E Sather; Shaibal Mukerjee; Kara L Allen; Luther Smith; Johnson Mathew; Clarence Jackson; Ryan Callison; Larry Scrapper; April Hathcoat; Jacque Adam; Danielle Keese; Philip Ketcher; Robert Brunette; Jason Karlstrom; Gerard Van der Jagt
Journal:  ScientificWorldJournal       Date:  2014-04-06

5.  A synthesis of patterns of environmental mercury inputs, exposure and effects in New York State.

Authors:  D C Evers; A K Sauer; D A Burns; N S Fisher; D C Bertok; E M Adams; M E H Burton; C T Driscoll
Journal:  Ecotoxicology       Date:  2020-11-10       Impact factor: 2.823

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.