Literature DB >> 22392664

Satisfying patient-consumer principles for health information exchange: evidence from California case studies.

Robert H Miller1.   

Abstract

In June 2010 sixteen organizations representing California patients and consumers adopted nine principles for electronically exchanging health information among and within provider organizations. The principles were formulated with the goal of improving patient and population health care by increasing the availability and use of patient data while protecting patients' privacy. This study assesses to what extent five health care organizations-all in different stages of increasing their capacity for health information exchange-conformed to the principles in early 2011. Although an increasing amount of electronic data has been exchanged among organizations and with patients, progress has been modest, and patients still have little control over their data. For organizations to comply with all nine patient and consumer principles, clear "rules of the road" for information sharing must be defined, and patient education in health information exchange and control over personal data must be increased.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22392664     DOI: 10.1377/hlthaff.2011.0531

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Health Aff (Millwood)        ISSN: 0278-2715            Impact factor:   6.301


  5 in total

1.  Health Information Exchange Readiness for Demonstrating Return on Investment and Quality of Care.

Authors:  Anjum Khurshid; Mark L Diana; Rahul Jain
Journal:  Perspect Health Inf Manag       Date:  2015-11-01

2.  Health systems' use of enterprise health information exchange vs single electronic health record vendor environments and unplanned readmissions.

Authors:  Joshua R Vest; Mark Aaron Unruh; Seth Freedman; Kosali Simon
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2019-10-01       Impact factor: 4.497

3.  Factors related to health information exchange participation and use.

Authors:  Valerie A Yeager; Daniel Walker; Evan Cole; Arthur M Mora; Mark L Diana
Journal:  J Med Syst       Date:  2014-06-24       Impact factor: 4.460

4.  Differing Strategies to Meet Information-Sharing Needs: Publicly Supported Community Health Information Exchanges Versus Health Systems' Enterprise Health Information Exchanges.

Authors:  Joshua R Vest; Bita A Kash
Journal:  Milbank Q       Date:  2016-03       Impact factor: 4.911

5.  Assessing payer perspectives on health information exchange.

Authors:  Dori A Cross; Sunny C Lin; Julia Adler-Milstein
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2015-07-03       Impact factor: 4.497

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.