Literature DB >> 22392538

Does osteoporosis therapy invalidate FRAX for fracture prediction?

William D Leslie1, Lisa M Lix, Helena Johansson, Anders Oden, Eugene McCloskey, John A Kanis.   

Abstract

Ten-year fracture risk assessment with the fracture risk assessment system (FRAX) is increasingly used to guide treatment decisions. Osteoporosis pharmacotherapy reduces fracture risk, but the effect is greater than can be explained from the increase in bone mineral density (BMD). Whether this invalidates fracture predictions with FRAX is uncertain. A total of 35,764 women (age ≥50 years) and baseline BMD testing (1996–2007) had FRAX probabilities retroactively calculated. A provincial pharmacy database was used to identify osteoporosis medication use. Women were categorized as untreated, current high adherence users [medication possession ratio (MPR) ≥0.80 in the year after BMD testing], current low adherence users (MPR <0.80), and past users. Fractures outcomes to 10 years were established form a population-based health data repository. FRAX and femoral neck BMD alone stratified major osteoporotic and hip fracture risk within untreated and each treated subgroup (all p-values <0.001) with similar area under the receiver operating characteristic curve. In untreated and each treated subgroup, a stepwise gradient in observed 10-year major osteoporotic and hip fracture incidence was found as a function of the predicted probability tertile (all p-values <0.001 for linear trend). Concordance (calibration) plots for major osteoporotic fractures and hip fractures showed good agreement between the predicted and observed 10-year fracture incidence in untreated women and each treated subgroup. Only in the highest risk tertile of women highly adherent to at least 5 years of bisphosphonate use was observed hip fracture risk significantly less than predicted, though major osteoporotic fracture risk was similar to predicted. In summary, this work suggests that the FRAX tool can be used to predict fracture probability in women currently or previously treated for osteoporosis. Although FRAX should not be used to assess the reduction in fracture risk in individuals on treatment, it may still have value for guiding the need for continued treatment or treatment withdrawal
© 2012 American Society for Bone and Mineral Research.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22392538     DOI: 10.1002/jbmr.1582

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Bone Miner Res        ISSN: 0884-0431            Impact factor:   6.741


  37 in total

1.  Bone: Performance of fracture risk prediction tools--old and new.

Authors:  David Killock
Journal:  Nat Rev Rheumatol       Date:  2012-03-13       Impact factor: 20.543

2.  My mother was saved from hip fracture by treatment for osteoporosis, but will I be?--Implications on risk estimates from successful osteoporosis treatment.

Authors:  B E Rosengren; M K Karlsson
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2012-06-16       Impact factor: 4.507

Review 3.  Managing Osteoporosis in Patients on Long-Term Bisphosphonate Treatment: Report of a Task Force of the American Society for Bone and Mineral Research.

Authors:  Robert A Adler; Ghada El-Hajj Fuleihan; Douglas C Bauer; Pauline M Camacho; Bart L Clarke; Gregory A Clines; Juliet E Compston; Matthew T Drake; Beatrice J Edwards; Murray J Favus; Susan L Greenspan; Ross McKinney; Robert J Pignolo; Deborah E Sellmeyer
Journal:  J Bone Miner Res       Date:  2016-01       Impact factor: 6.741

4.  High prevalence of spine–femur bone mineral density discordance and comparison of vertebral fracture risk assessment using femoral neck and lumbar spine bone density in Korean patients.

Authors:  Hannah Seok; Kwang Joon Kim; Kyoung Min Kim; Yumie Rhee; Bong Soo Cha; Sung-Kil Lim
Journal:  J Bone Miner Metab       Date:  2014-07       Impact factor: 2.626

5.  Evaluation on the cost-effective threshold of osteoporosis treatment on elderly women in China using discrete event simulation model.

Authors:  W Ni; Y Jiang
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2016-08-31       Impact factor: 4.507

6.  Trabecular bone score may improve FRAX® prediction accuracy for major osteoporotic fractures in elderly Japanese men: the Fujiwara-kyo Osteoporosis Risk in Men (FORMEN) Cohort Study.

Authors:  M Iki; Y Fujita; J Tamaki; K Kouda; A Yura; Y Sato; J-S Moon; R Winzenrieth; N Okamoto; N Kurumatani
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2015-03-10       Impact factor: 4.507

7.  Trends in hip fracture rates in Taiwan: a nationwide study from 1996 to 2010.

Authors:  T Y Wu; H Y Hu; S Y Lin; W C Chie; R S Yang; C K Liaw
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2016-11-17       Impact factor: 4.507

Review 8.  Co-morbidity index in rheumatoid arthritis: time to think.

Authors:  Yasser El Miedany
Journal:  Clin Rheumatol       Date:  2015-10-26       Impact factor: 2.980

9.  Characteristics of patients who suffer major osteoporotic fractures despite adhering to alendronate treatment: a National Prescription registry study.

Authors:  B Abrahamsen; K H Rubin; P A Eiken; R Eastell
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2012-10-16       Impact factor: 4.507

Review 10.  A systematic review of intervention thresholds based on FRAX : A report prepared for the National Osteoporosis Guideline Group and the International Osteoporosis Foundation.

Authors:  John A Kanis; Nicholas C Harvey; Cyrus Cooper; Helena Johansson; Anders Odén; Eugene V McCloskey
Journal:  Arch Osteoporos       Date:  2016-07-27       Impact factor: 2.617

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.