Literature DB >> 22392421

A real-world evaluation of oral vancomycin for severe Clostridium difficile infection: implications for antibiotic stewardship programs.

Frank Le1, Vaneet Arora, Dhara N Shah, Miguel Salazar, Hannah R Palmer, Kevin W Garey.   

Abstract

STUDY
OBJECTIVE: To assess antibiotic treatment patterns and clinical outcomes of patients with Clostridium difficile infection (CDI) based on underlying severity of CDI disease.
DESIGN: Retrospective analysis of data from a prospective cohort study.
SETTING: Large tertiary care university hospital. PATIENTS: One hundred forty-four patients (mean ± SD age 63 ± 17 yrs) with CDI who received metronidazole (intravenous or oral) or oral vancomycin as their initial therapy option between 2006 and 2008.
MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Patients were stratified by severity of illness and treatment, and outcomes assessed were clinical response, relapse of disease, all-cause inpatient mortality, and length of hospital stay. Mild-moderate CDI disease was present in 85 patients (59%) and severe disease in 59 patients (41%). Overall, oral vancomycin was given to 16 patients (11%); use of this drug did not differ according to severity of infection. Among patients with severe disease, clinical success occurred in 32 (63%) of 51 patients given metronidazole and in all 8 patients (100%) given vancomycin (p=0.04). Inpatient mortality and hospital length of stay were lower in patients with severe CDI who were given oral vancomycin, although these results were not statistically significant.
CONCLUSION: Oral vancomycin was not commonly used for severe CDI. An improved clinical response rate was observed in patients with severe CDI given oral vancomycin; this outcome supported results from clinical trials. Antibiotic stewardship teams could play a major role in providing guidance on CDI treatment based on severity.
© 2012 Pharmacotherapy Publications, Inc.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22392421     DOI: 10.1002/PHAR.1002

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Pharmacotherapy        ISSN: 0277-0008            Impact factor:   4.705


  5 in total

1.  Predictive factors, outcomes, and molecular epidemiology of Clostridioides difficile diarrhea in Brazilian hospitals.

Authors:  Evelyne Santana Girão; Bruno de Melo Tavares; Sania Alves Dos Santos; Gessica Lorena Gamarra; Camila Rizek; Roberta Cristina Martins; Lauro Vieira Perdigão Neto; Constancia Diogo; Tatiana D' Annibale Orsi; Hugo Manuel Paz Morales; Keite da Silva Nogueira; Adriane Ceshin Maestri; Icaro Boszczowski; Filipe Piastrelli; Cecilia Leite Costa; Daniely Viana Costa; Geovania Maciel; Janete Romão; Thais Guimarães; Gerly Anne de Castro Brito; Silvia Figueiredo Costa
Journal:  Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis       Date:  2021-03-30       Impact factor: 3.267

Review 2.  Which is the Preferred Regimen for Non-Severe Clostridioides difficile Infection in Korea, Vancomycin or Metronidazole?

Authors:  Jieun Kim; Jinyeong Kim; Bongyoung Kim; Hyunjoo Pai
Journal:  Infect Chemother       Date:  2022-05-30

3.  Initial vancomycin versus metronidazole for the treatment of first-episode non-severe Clostridioides difficile infection.

Authors:  Kevin Zhang; Patricia Beckett; Salaheddin Abouanaser; Marek Smieja
Journal:  Antimicrob Steward Healthc Epidemiol       Date:  2021-09-30

Review 4.  Efficacy and Safety of Metronidazole Monotherapy versus Vancomycin Monotherapy or Combination Therapy in Patients with Clostridium difficile Infection: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Rui Li; Laichun Lu; Yu Lin; Mingxia Wang; Xin Liu
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-10-07       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 5.  A meta-analysis of metronidazole and vancomycin for the treatment of Clostridium difficile infection, stratified by disease severity.

Authors:  Xiuzhen Di; Nan Bai; Xin Zhang; Bin Liu; Wentao Ni; Jin Wang; Kai Wang; Beibei Liang; Youning Liu; Rui Wang
Journal:  Braz J Infect Dis       Date:  2015-05-19       Impact factor: 3.257

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.