BACKGROUND: Studies examining the impact of lower socioeconomic status (SES) on the outcomes of patients with nonsmall cell lung cancer (NSCLC) are inconsistent. The objective of this study was to clearly elucidate the association between SES, education, and clinical outcomes among patients with NSCLC. METHODS: The study population was derived from a consecutive, retrospective cohort of patients with NSCLC who received treatment within the Duke Health System between 1995 and 2007. SES determinants were based on the individual's census tract and corresponding 2000 Census data. Determinants included the percentage of the population living below poverty, the median household income, and the percentages of residents with at least a high school diploma and at least a bachelor's degree. The SES and educational variables were divided into quartiles. Statistical comparisons were performed using the 25th and 75th percentiles. RESULTS: Individuals who resided in areas with a low median household income or in which a high percentage of residents were living below the poverty line had a shorter cancer-specific 6-year survival than individuals who resided in converse areas (P = .0167 and P = .0067, respectively). Those living in areas in which a higher percentage of residents achieved a high school diploma had improved disease outcomes compared with those living in areas in which a lower percentage attained a high school diploma (P = .0033). A survival advantage also was observed for inhabitants of areas in which a higher percentage of residents attained a bachelor's degree (P = .0455). CONCLUSIONS: Low SES was identified as an independent prognostic factor for poor survival in patients with both early and advanced stage NSCLC. Patients who lived in areas with high poverty levels, low median incomes, and low education levels had worse mortality.
BACKGROUND: Studies examining the impact of lower socioeconomic status (SES) on the outcomes of patients with nonsmall cell lung cancer (NSCLC) are inconsistent. The objective of this study was to clearly elucidate the association between SES, education, and clinical outcomes among patients with NSCLC. METHODS: The study population was derived from a consecutive, retrospective cohort of patients with NSCLC who received treatment within the Duke Health System between 1995 and 2007. SES determinants were based on the individual's census tract and corresponding 2000 Census data. Determinants included the percentage of the population living below poverty, the median household income, and the percentages of residents with at least a high school diploma and at least a bachelor's degree. The SES and educational variables were divided into quartiles. Statistical comparisons were performed using the 25th and 75th percentiles. RESULTS: Individuals who resided in areas with a low median household income or in which a high percentage of residents were living below the poverty line had a shorter cancer-specific 6-year survival than individuals who resided in converse areas (P = .0167 and P = .0067, respectively). Those living in areas in which a higher percentage of residents achieved a high school diploma had improved disease outcomes compared with those living in areas in which a lower percentage attained a high school diploma (P = .0033). A survival advantage also was observed for inhabitants of areas in which a higher percentage of residents attained a bachelor's degree (P = .0455). CONCLUSIONS: Low SES was identified as an independent prognostic factor for poor survival in patients with both early and advanced stage NSCLC. Patients who lived in areas with high poverty levels, low median incomes, and low education levels had worse mortality.
Authors: Melinda C Aldrich; Eric L Grogan; Heather M Munro; Lisa B Signorello; William J Blot Journal: J Thorac Oncol Date: 2013-10 Impact factor: 15.609
Authors: Norma E Farrow; Selena J An; Paul J Speicher; David H Harpole; Thomas A D'Amico; Jacob A Klapper; Matthew G Hartwig; Betty C Tong Journal: J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg Date: 2019-11-13 Impact factor: 5.209
Authors: Jyotsna S Jagai; Lynne C Messer; Kristen M Rappazzo; Christine L Gray; Shannon C Grabich; Danelle T Lobdell Journal: Cancer Date: 2017-05-08 Impact factor: 6.860
Authors: John N Melvan; Manu S Sancheti; Theresa Gillespie; Dana C Nickleach; Yuan Liu; Kristin Higgins; Suresh Ramalingam; Joseph Lipscomb; Felix G Fernandez Journal: J Am Coll Surg Date: 2015-04-16 Impact factor: 6.113
Authors: Steven K M Lau; Bhavani S Gannavarapu; Kristen Carter; Ang Gao; Chul Ahn; Jeffrey J Meyer; David J Sher; Aminah Jatoi; Rodney Infante; Puneeth Iyengar Journal: J Oncol Pract Date: 2018-03-20 Impact factor: 3.840
Authors: Gregory A Masters; Sarah Temin; Christopher G Azzoli; Giuseppe Giaccone; Sherman Baker; Julie R Brahmer; Peter M Ellis; Ajeet Gajra; Nancy Rackear; Joan H Schiller; Thomas J Smith; John R Strawn; David Trent; David H Johnson Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2015-08-31 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Loretta Erhunmwunsee; Sam E Wing; Jenny Shen; Hengrui Hu; Ernesto Sosa; Lisa N Lopez; Catherine Raquel; Melissa Sur; Pilar Ibarra-Noriega; Madeline Currey; Janet Lee; Jae Y Kim; Dan J Raz; Arya Amini; Sagus Sampath; Marianna Koczywas; Erminia Massarelli; Howard L West; Karen L Reckamp; Rick A Kittles; Ravi Salgia; Victoria L Seewaldt; Susan L Neuhausen; Stacy W Gray Journal: Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev Date: 2021-06-04 Impact factor: 4.254
Authors: William W Phillips; Jessica Copeland; Sophie C Hofferberth; Julee R Armitage; Sam Fox; Margaret Kruithoff; Claire de Forcrand; Paul J Catalano; Christopher S Lathan; Joel S Weissman; David D Odell; Yolonda L Colson Journal: Healthc (Amst) Date: 2021-06-26