Literature DB >> 22392057

Disc herniation diagnosis in MRI using a CAD framework and a two-level classifier.

Jaehan Koh1, Vipin Chaudhary, Gurmeet Dhillon.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Disc herniation in the lumbar spine is a common condition, so an automated method for diagnosis could be helpful in clinical applications. A computer-aided framework for disk herniation diagnosis was developed for use in magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). MATERIALS AND
METHOD: A computer-aided diagnosis framework for lumbar spine with a two-level classification scheme for disc herniation diagnosis was developed using heterogeneous classifiers: a perceptron classifier, a least mean square classifier, a support vector machine classifier, and a k-Means classifier. Each classifier makes a diagnosis based on a feature set generated from regions of interest that contain vertebrae, a disc, and the spinal cord. Then, an ensemble classifier makes a final decision using score values of each classifier. We used clinical MR image data from 70 subjects in T1-weighted sagittal view and T2-weighted sagittal view for evaluation of the system.
RESULTS: MR images of 70 subjects were processed using the proposed framework resulting in successful detection of disc herniation with 99% accuracy, achieving a speedup factor of 30 in comparison with radiologist's diagnosis.
CONCLUSION: The computer-aided framework works well to diagnose herniated discs in MRI scans. We expect the framework can be adapted to effectively diagnose a variety of abnormalities in the lumbar spine.

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22392057     DOI: 10.1007/s11548-012-0674-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg        ISSN: 1861-6410            Impact factor:   2.924


  15 in total

1.  Nomenclature and classification of lumbar disc pathology. Recommendations of the Combined task Forces of the North American Spine Society, American Society of Spine Radiology, and American Society of Neuroradiology.

Authors:  D F Fardon; P C Milette
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2001-03-01       Impact factor: 3.468

2.  Low back pain.

Authors:  M N Brant-Zawadzki; S C Dennis; G F Gade; M P Weinstein
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2000-11       Impact factor: 11.105

3.  Workload of radiologists in United States in 2006-2007 and trends since 1991-1992.

Authors:  Mythreyi Bhargavan; Adam H Kaye; Howard P Forman; Jonathan H Sunshine
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2009-06-09       Impact factor: 11.105

4.  Magnetic resonance imaging in the evaluation of the lumbar herniated intervertebral disc.

Authors:  K Y Kim; Y T Kim; C S Lee; J S Kang; Y J Kim
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  1993       Impact factor: 3.075

Review 5.  Magnetic resonance imaging for low back pain: indications and limitations.

Authors:  N J Sheehan
Journal:  Ann Rheum Dis       Date:  2010-01       Impact factor: 19.103

6.  Back pain prevalence and visit rates: estimates from U.S. national surveys, 2002.

Authors:  Richard A Deyo; Sohail K Mirza; Brook I Martin
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2006-11-01       Impact factor: 3.468

7.  Modified Pfirrmann grading system for lumbar intervertebral disc degeneration.

Authors:  James F Griffith; Yi-Xiang J Wang; Gregory E Antonio; Kai Chow Choi; Alfred Yu; Anil T Ahuja; Ping Chung Leung
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2007-11-15       Impact factor: 3.468

Review 8.  Diagnostic evaluation of low back pain with emphasis on imaging.

Authors:  Jeffrey G Jarvik; Richard A Deyo
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  2002-10-01       Impact factor: 25.391

9.  National Ambulatory Medical Care Survey: 2006 summary.

Authors:  Donald K Cherry; Esther Hing; David A Woodwell; Elizabeth A Rechtsteiner
Journal:  Natl Health Stat Report       Date:  2008-08-06

Review 10.  Magnetic resonance imaging in low back pain: general principles and clinical issues.

Authors:  P F Beattie; S P Meyers
Journal:  Phys Ther       Date:  1998-07
View more
  6 in total

1.  Machine Learning for the Prediction of Cervical Spondylotic Myelopathy: A Post Hoc Pilot Study of 28 Participants.

Authors:  Benjamin S Hopkins; Kenneth A Weber; Kartik Kesavabhotla; Monica Paliwal; Donald R Cantrell; Zachary A Smith
Journal:  World Neurosurg       Date:  2019-03-25       Impact factor: 2.104

Review 2.  Artificial Intelligence and Computer Aided Diagnosis in Chronic Low Back Pain: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Federico D'Antoni; Fabrizio Russo; Luca Ambrosio; Luca Bacco; Luca Vollero; Gianluca Vadalà; Mario Merone; Rocco Papalia; Vincenzo Denaro
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2022-05-14       Impact factor: 4.614

3.  Diagnosis of osteoarthritic changes, loss of cervical lordosis, and disc space narrowing on cervical radiographs with deep learning methods.

Authors:  Yüksel Maraş; Gül Tokdemir; Kemal Üreten; Ebru Atalar; Semra Duran; Hakan Maraş
Journal:  Jt Dis Relat Surg       Date:  2022-03-28

4.  Exploring the Potential of Generative Adversarial Networks for Synthesizing Radiological Images of the Spine to be Used in In Silico Trials.

Authors:  Fabio Galbusera; Frank Niemeyer; Maike Seyfried; Tito Bassani; Gloria Casaroli; Annette Kienle; Hans-Joachim Wilke
Journal:  Front Bioeng Biotechnol       Date:  2018-05-03

5.  Artificial intelligence in orthopaedics: A scoping review.

Authors:  Simon J Federer; Gareth G Jones
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2021-11-23       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Generative models: an upcoming innovation in musculoskeletal radiology? A preliminary test in spine imaging.

Authors:  Fabio Galbusera; Tito Bassani; Gloria Casaroli; Salvatore Gitto; Edoardo Zanchetta; Francesco Costa; Luca Maria Sconfienza
Journal:  Eur Radiol Exp       Date:  2018-10-31
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.