Literature DB >> 22391955

Using high-voltage electrical stimulation in the treatment of recalcitrant pressure ulcers: results of a randomized, controlled clinical study .

Andrzej Franek1, Roman Kostur, Anna Polak, Jakub Taradaj, Zbigniew Szlachta, Edward Blaszczak, Patrycja Dolibog, Paweł Dolibog, Bogdan Koczy, Cezary Kucio.   

Abstract

 The use of electrical stimulation has been studied in a variety of wounds emphasizing different variables with regard to provision of therapy. The purpose of this prospective, randomized, controlled clinical study was to evaluate the effect of high-voltage electrical stimulation (HVES) on nonhealing, lower-extremity, Stage II and Stage III pressure ulcers. Patients admitted for care and eligible to participate in the study received standard supportive care and topical treatments covered with wet-to-moist dressings. Patients assigned to the treatment arm of the study also received HVES (100 V; 100 μs; 100 Hz) continuously for 50 minutes once daily, five times per week. Patients were followed until healing for a maximum of 6 weeks. Wound tracings and measurements were obtained weekly. Over a 4-year period, 26 patients were enrolled in the treatment and 24 in the control group. Ulcers had existed for an average of 3.17 and 2.83 months in the treatment and control groups, respectively. Most were classified as Stage II (17 in the treatment and 16 in the control group) with an average baseline size of 4.54 cm2 and 3.97 cm2, respectively. Wound areas and linear measurements decreased significantly in both groups (P <0.05), but increases in granulation tissue were significant in the treatment group only (P = 0.006). Wound area, linear measurement, wound volume, and granulation tissue changes were statistically significantly greater in the treatment than in the control group starting in the second week of treatment. Week 6 surface area change was 88.9% (SD 14) in the treatment and 44.4% (SD 63.1) in the control group (P = 0.00003). Correlation coefficients between changes in wound surface area, longest length, and longest width were R = 0.96 and R = 0.98 in the treatment and R = 0.94 and R = 0.89 in the control group. HVES improved the healing rate of recalcitrant Stage II and Stage III pressure ulcers. Research to compare the effectiveness of using cathodic and anodal stimulation combined or alone and to determine the optimal duration of these two types of electrical stimulation is warranted.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22391955

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ostomy Wound Manage        ISSN: 0889-5899            Impact factor:   2.629


  22 in total

1.  Pressure ulcers: treatment.

Authors:  Madhuri Reddy
Journal:  BMJ Clin Evid       Date:  2015-12-11

Review 2.  Dressings and topical agents for treating pressure ulcers.

Authors:  Maggie J Westby; Jo C Dumville; Marta O Soares; Nikki Stubbs; Gill Norman
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2017-06-22

Review 3.  Platelet-rich plasma and the elimination of neuropathic pain.

Authors:  Damien P Kuffler
Journal:  Mol Neurobiol       Date:  2013-07-07       Impact factor: 5.590

Review 4.  High-Voltage Pulsed Current Electrical Stimulation in Wound Treatment.

Authors:  Anna Polak; Andrzej Franek; Jakub Taradaj
Journal:  Adv Wound Care (New Rochelle)       Date:  2014-02-01       Impact factor: 4.730

5.  Modulation of cell function by electric field: a high-resolution analysis.

Authors:  T Taghian; D A Narmoneva; A B Kogan
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2015-06-06       Impact factor: 4.118

Review 6.  Electrical Stimulation Technologies for Wound Healing.

Authors:  Luther C Kloth
Journal:  Adv Wound Care (New Rochelle)       Date:  2014-02-01       Impact factor: 4.730

Review 7.  Electrostimulation: Current Status, Strength of Evidence Guidelines, and Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Gerard Koel; Pamela E Houghton
Journal:  Adv Wound Care (New Rochelle)       Date:  2014-02-01       Impact factor: 4.730

8.  The analgesic effect of electrostimulation (WoundEL®) in the treatment of leg ulcers.

Authors:  Pauline Leloup; Pascal Toussaint; Jean-Paul Lembelembe; Philippe Célérier; Hervé Maillard
Journal:  Int Wound J       Date:  2014-02-12       Impact factor: 3.315

9.  Electrical Stimulation for Pressure Injuries: A Health Technology Assessment.

Authors: 
Journal:  Ont Health Technol Assess Ser       Date:  2017-11-08

10.  Electrical stimulation for treating pressure ulcers.

Authors:  Mohit Arora; Lisa A Harvey; Joanne V Glinsky; Lianne Nier; Lucija Lavrencic; Annette Kifley; Ian D Cameron
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2020-01-22
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.