Literature DB >> 22391866

Comparison between continuous and discontinuous multiple vertebral compression fractures.

Shuji Kano1, Hirotaka Tanikawa, Yuji Mogami, Shun-ichi Shibata, Seiji Takanashi, Yoshihito Oji, Takashi Aoki, Hiroki Oba, Shota Ikegami, Jun Takahashi.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The majority of multiple vertebral fractures (MVFs) occur under high-energy conditions; however, some cases occurring under minor-energy conditions exist. Fractures in successive vertebrae (continuous type) and in skipped vertebrae (discontinuous type) can exist.
PURPOSE: The objective of this study was to compare and evaluate the cause, level of injury, and relationship to osteoporosis between continuous and discontinuous MVFs.
METHODS: We studied 77 subjects (173 vertebrae) who had presented with acute back pain between September 2007 and April 2010 and who received diagnoses of fresh MVFs through magnetic resonance imaging. Subjects with continuous and discontinuous fractures were evaluated based on age, sex, bone mineral density (BMD), level of affected vertebrae, and cause of injury.
RESULTS: Subjects with discontinuous MVFs were significantly older and comprised more female patients. Mean BMD, measured by dual-emission X-ray absorptiometry, was 0.70 and 0.58 g/cm(3) for the continuous and discontinuous MVFs, respectively, demonstrating a significant difference. Of 34 patients with discontinuous MVFs, 32 (94%) exhibited vertebral fractures in the thoracolumbar junction. In subjects with continuous MVFs, the MVFs of 19 (44%) subjects were caused by high-energy trauma, whereas mild trauma and unknown cause were identified in 14 (41%) and 13 (38%) subjects with discontinuous MVFs, respectively.
CONCLUSIONS: Discontinuous MVFs generally caused by mild outer force, and often occurred at the thoracolumbar junction. Continuous MVFs, frequently, were caused by high-energy trauma.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22391866      PMCID: PMC3459131          DOI: 10.1007/s00586-012-2210-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Spine J        ISSN: 0940-6719            Impact factor:   3.134


  10 in total

1.  Incidence of clinically diagnosed vertebral fractures: a population-based study in Rochester, Minnesota, 1985-1989.

Authors:  C Cooper; E J Atkinson; W M O'Fallon; L J Melton
Journal:  J Bone Miner Res       Date:  1992-02       Impact factor: 6.741

2.  Vertebral fracture prevalence among women screened for the Fracture Intervention Trial and a simple clinical tool to screen for undiagnosed vertebral fractures. Fracture Intervention Trial Research Group.

Authors:  T M Vogt; P D Ross; L Palermo; T Musliner; H K Genant; D Black; D E Thompson
Journal:  Mayo Clin Proc       Date:  2000-09       Impact factor: 7.616

3.  The natural history of vertebral osteoporosis. Is low bone mass an epiphenomenon?

Authors:  R P Heaney
Journal:  Bone       Date:  1992       Impact factor: 4.398

4.  The clinical consequences of vertebral compression fracture.

Authors:  S L Silverman
Journal:  Bone       Date:  1992       Impact factor: 4.398

5.  Vertebral fractures and mortality in older women: a prospective study. Study of Osteoporotic Fractures Research Group.

Authors:  D M Kado; W S Browner; L Palermo; M C Nevitt; H K Genant; S R Cummings
Journal:  Arch Intern Med       Date:  1999-06-14

6.  Randomised trial of effect of alendronate on risk of fracture in women with existing vertebral fractures. Fracture Intervention Trial Research Group.

Authors:  D M Black; S R Cummings; D B Karpf; J A Cauley; D E Thompson; M C Nevitt; D C Bauer; H K Genant; W L Haskell; R Marcus; S M Ott; J C Torner; S A Quandt; T F Reiss; K E Ensrud
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1996-12-07       Impact factor: 79.321

7.  Benign versus pathologic compression fractures of vertebral bodies: assessment with conventional spin-echo, chemical-shift, and STIR MR imaging.

Authors:  L L Baker; S B Goodman; I Perkash; B Lane; D R Enzmann
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1990-02       Impact factor: 11.105

8.  Relationship of lung function to severity of osteoporosis in women.

Authors:  J A Leech; C Dulberg; S Kellie; L Pattee; J Gay
Journal:  Am Rev Respir Dis       Date:  1990-01

9.  Quality of life issues in women with vertebral fractures due to osteoporosis.

Authors:  D J Cook; G H Guyatt; J D Adachi; J Clifton; L E Griffith; R S Epstein; E F Juniper
Journal:  Arthritis Rheum       Date:  1993-06

10.  Association of osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures with impaired functional status.

Authors:  K W Lyles; D T Gold; K M Shipp; C F Pieper; S Martinez; P L Mulhausen
Journal:  Am J Med       Date:  1993-06       Impact factor: 4.965

  10 in total
  3 in total

1.  Importance of spinal deformity index in risk evaluation of VCF (vertebral compression fractures) in obese subjects: prospective study.

Authors:  Carlo Ruosi; S Liccardo; M Rubino; D Rossi; G Colella; C Di Somma; A Colao
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2013-09-24       Impact factor: 3.134

2.  Concomitant and previous osteoporotic vertebral fractures.

Authors:  Markus Lenski; Natalie Büser; Michael Scherer
Journal:  Acta Orthop       Date:  2017-01-06       Impact factor: 3.717

3.  Clinical Features and Treatment Outcomes of Acute Multiple Thoracic and Lumbar Spinal Fractures : A Comparison of Continuous and Noncontinuous Fractures.

Authors:  Yongjae Cho; Young Goo Kim
Journal:  J Korean Neurosurg Soc       Date:  2019-10-30
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.