Literature DB >> 22391680

Osteoporotic vertebral compression fracture augmentation by injectable partly resorbable ceramic bone substitute (Cerament™|SPINESUPPORT): a prospective nonrandomized study.

Salvatore Masala1, Giovanni Nano, Stefano Marcia, Mario Muto, Francesco P M Fucci, Giovanni Simonetti.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: This study aimed to evaluate long-term stabilizing healing effectiveness and influence on adjacent intact vertebral bodies of a new injectable partly resorbable calcium sulfate (60 wt.%)/hydroxyapatite (40 wt.%) bone substitute employed in vertebral augmentation of osteoporotic collapses.
METHODS: From April 2009 to April 2011, 80 patients underwent vertebral augmentation. Patient enrolment criteria are as follows: age more than 20 years; symptomatic osteoporotic vertebral compression fracture from low energy trauma encompassing level T5 to L1 and classified as A1.1 to A1.2 according to the AO classification system; vertebral height compression within 0-75% compared to the posterior (dorsal) wall; client history confirming the age of the compression fracture to be within at least 4 weeks; and patients who are able to understand the procedure and participate in the study. Preoperative and postoperative imaging studies consisted of computed tomography, plain X-ray, dual X-ray absorptiometry scanning, and magnetic resonance. Pain intensity has been evaluated by an 11-point visual analog scale (VAS), and physical and quality of life compromise assessments have been evaluated by Oswestry Disability Questionnaire (ODI). All procedures have been performed fluoroscopically guided by left unilateral approach under local anesthesia and mild sedation.
RESULTS: VAS-based pain trend over 12-month follow-up has shown a statistical significant (p < 0.001) decrease, starting from 7.68 (SD 1.83) preoperatively with an immediate first day decrease at 3.51 (SD 2.16) and 0.96 (SD 0.93) at 12 months. The ODI score dropped significantly from 54.78% to 20.12% at 6 months. None device-related complication has been reported. In no case, a new incidental adjacent fracture has been reported.
CONCLUSION: Data show how this injectable partly resorbable ceramic cement could be a nontoxic and lower stiffness alternative to polymethylmethacrylate for immediate and long-term stabilization of osteoporotic collapsed vertebral bodies.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22391680     DOI: 10.1007/s00234-012-1016-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neuroradiology        ISSN: 0028-3940            Impact factor:   2.804


  49 in total

1.  Percutaneous vertebroplasty: complication avoidance and technique optimization.

Authors:  John M Mathis
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2003-09       Impact factor: 3.825

2.  Epidemiology of vertebral fractures in women.

Authors:  L J Melton; S H Kan; M A Frye; H W Wahner; W M O'Fallon; B L Riggs
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  1989-05       Impact factor: 4.897

3.  Percutaneous polymethylmethacrylate vertebroplasty in the treatment of osteoporotic vertebral body compression fractures: technical aspects.

Authors:  M E Jensen; A J Evans; J M Mathis; D F Kallmes; H J Cloft; J E Dion
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  1997 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 3.825

4.  Mechanical properties of blood-mixed polymethylmetacrylate in percutaneous vertebroplasty.

Authors:  Dong Ki Ahn; Song Lee; Dea Jung Choi; Soon Yeol Park; Dae Gon Woo; Chi Hoon Kim; Han Sung Kim
Journal:  Asian Spine J       Date:  2009-12-31

5.  Viscoelastic behaviour of acrylic bone cements.

Authors:  D N Yetkinler; A S Litsky
Journal:  Biomaterials       Date:  1998-09       Impact factor: 12.479

6.  Osteogenic response of rabbit tibia to hydroxyapatite particle-Plaster of Paris mixture.

Authors:  S Sato; T Koshino; T Saito
Journal:  Biomaterials       Date:  1998-10       Impact factor: 12.479

7.  Incidence of symptomatic vertebral fractures in patients after percutaneous vertebroplasty.

Authors:  Johannes Hierholzer; Heiko Fuchs; Kerstin Westphalen; Clemens Baumann; Christine Slotosch; Rudolf Schulz
Journal:  Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol       Date:  2008-07-01       Impact factor: 2.740

Review 8.  DXA scanning in clinical practice.

Authors:  A El Maghraoui; C Roux
Journal:  QJM       Date:  2008-03-10

9.  The effect of cement augmentation on the load transfer in an osteoporotic functional spinal unit: finite-element analysis.

Authors:  Anne Polikeit; Lutz Peter Nolte; Stephen J Ferguson
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2003-05-15       Impact factor: 3.468

10.  [Preliminary note on the treatment of vertebral angioma by percutaneous acrylic vertebroplasty].

Authors:  P Galibert; H Deramond; P Rosat; D Le Gars
Journal:  Neurochirurgie       Date:  1987       Impact factor: 1.553

View more
  15 in total

1.  Thoraco-lumbar traumatic vertebral fractures augmentation by osteo-conductive and osteo-inductive bone substitute containing strontium-hydroxyapatite: our experience.

Authors:  Salvatore Masala; Amedeo Taglieri; Antonio Chiaravalloti; Eros Calabria; Marco Morini; Riccardo Iundusi; Umberto Tarantino; Giovanni Simonetti
Journal:  Neuroradiology       Date:  2014-03-21       Impact factor: 2.804

Review 2.  Injectable foams for regenerative medicine.

Authors:  Edna M Prieto; Jonathan M Page; Andrew J Harmata; Scott A Guelcher
Journal:  Wiley Interdiscip Rev Nanomed Nanobiotechnol       Date:  2013-10-11

Review 3.  What's new in vertebral cementoplasty?

Authors:  Mario Muto; Gianluigi Guarnieri; Francesco Giurazza; Luigi Manfrè
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2016-01-05       Impact factor: 3.039

4.  Treatment of painful Modic type I changes by vertebral augmentation with bioactive resorbable bone cement.

Authors:  Salvatore Masala; Giovanni Carlo Anselmetti; Stefano Marcia; Giovanni Nano; Amedeo Taglieri; Eros Calabria; Marcello Chiocchi; Giovanni Simonetti
Journal:  Neuroradiology       Date:  2014-05-01       Impact factor: 2.804

Review 5.  Percutaneous treatment of symptomatic aneurysmal bone cyst of L5 by percutaneous injection of osteoconductive material (Cerament).

Authors:  Gianluigi Guarnieri; Pasquale Vassallo; Massimo Muto; Mario Muto
Journal:  BMJ Case Rep       Date:  2013-11-01

6.  The Photodynamic Bone Stabilization System: a minimally invasive, percutaneous intramedullary polymeric osteosynthesis for simple and complex long bone fractures.

Authors:  Paul Vegt; Jeffrey M Muir; Jon E Block
Journal:  Med Devices (Auckl)       Date:  2014-12-12

7.  Prophylactic vertebroplasty procedure applied with a resorbable bone cement can decrease the fracture risk of sandwich vertebrae: long-term evaluation of clinical outcomes.

Authors:  Pu Jia; Hai Tang; Hao Chen; Li Bao; Fei Feng; He Yang; Jinjun Li
Journal:  Regen Biomater       Date:  2016-12-30

Review 8.  The role of orthobiologics in foot and ankle surgery: Allogenic bone grafts and bone graft substitutes.

Authors:  James Wee; Gowreeson Thevendran
Journal:  EFORT Open Rev       Date:  2017-06-01

9.  Novel bioactive glass based injectable bone cement with improved osteoinductivity and its in vivo evaluation.

Authors:  Tengjiao Zhu; Huihui Ren; Ailing Li; Bingchuan Liu; Caiyun Cui; Yanmei Dong; Yun Tian; Dong Qiu
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-06-15       Impact factor: 4.379

10.  Complete twelve month bone remodeling with a bi-phasic injectable bone substitute in benign bone tumors: a prospective pilot study.

Authors:  Jacek Kaczmarczyk; Piotr Sowinski; Maciej Goch; Katarzyna Katulska
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2015-11-26       Impact factor: 2.362

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.